64 replies to this topic

[HauptmanT]

Ok here's the thing.

I spent more time playing MW4 than any other Battletech product... even the original Tabletop.
So... MW4 is more lore to me than anything else in existence. Because that game is still fun to play. I'm sure there are others that feel the same... since it was the last MW game for like a 10 year period of dry.

So Hellhound (clan name)/ Box-on-stool (IS name). And all problems resolved, since Hellhound was the IS name for the Conjurer, and we all already know IS Freebirths are dumb, and we shouldnt use their names anymore.

Then later, you can add your Conjurer, or Wolvie IIC, or whateve ya wanna call it.

But my vote is 100% for MW4 Hellhound. It's a great looking design.


Edit; and god no it better not be a std engine @ 90kph omni mech. That's just horrible. The 90kph is bearable, but not the std engine. I'd like to see fastah though, if no ECM.

Edited by HauptmanT, 17 December 2016 - 10:32 PM.

[Tordin]

Agreed. HauptmanT
Could solve it all and everbody happy.

[Juodas Varnas]

Requiemking, on 17 December 2016 - 09:58 PM, said:

The only derpy quads here are the Scorpion, the Sirocco, and the Goliath. Oh, wait, can't forget the Xanthos.

You're being sarcastic right?
Cause those ones are the BEST (along with the Tarantula)

IS THIS SOME SORT OF CLAN AGENDA?!

[Appogee]

razenWing, on 18 September 2016 - 04:34 AM, said:

Even with the imminent release of the Huntsman, there's still no Clan mech that can be said to be the true opposite of Griffins.

Just like there's no true opposite of the ACH.

Ie. the "need for true opposite" argument doesn't hold up when there are so many disparities.

I'd be more sympathetic to the need for a 20t Clan Mech.

Edited by Appogee, 18 December 2016 - 01:36 PM.

[ice trey]

razenWing, on 18 September 2016 - 04:40 AM, said:

More tourists like the MW4 design anyhow.

ftfy
It was a dumb Microsoft mistake caused by not actually looking up whether or not a mech existed already.