Tina Benoit, on 16 November 2016 - 01:21 PM, said:
Creative Dev Stream With 3D Mech Modeler Mark Nicholson On Thursday At 2Pm Pst
#21
Posted 16 November 2016 - 01:23 PM
#22
Posted 16 November 2016 - 01:40 PM
No worries. Fix your 'net. We'll be here.
#23
Posted 16 November 2016 - 04:09 PM
#24
Posted 16 November 2016 - 05:27 PM
The current plan is to do it at the same time tomorrow (2pm pst)
I'll update this in the morning to confirm or let you know if the plan has changed.
#25
Posted 16 November 2016 - 06:24 PM
#26
Posted 16 November 2016 - 06:29 PM
Mark Nicholson, on 16 November 2016 - 05:27 PM, said:
The current plan is to do it at the same time tomorrow (2pm pst)
I'll update this in the morning to confirm or let you know if the plan has changed.
Oh, hi Mark!
So the stream has changed to Thursday, November 17, 2016 @ 14:00 PST?
Thanks!
#27
Posted 17 November 2016 - 11:21 AM
#29
Posted 17 November 2016 - 11:38 AM
*Edit: The Dev matches where Tina streams.
Edited by BWS2K, 17 November 2016 - 11:39 AM.
#30
Posted 17 November 2016 - 01:18 PM
I can remember ... but you did this right? http://mwomercs.com/...-mech-3d-model/
if you did, can you let is 'accidentally' slip into a patch?
#31
Posted 17 November 2016 - 01:31 PM
My personal opinion on its inclusion in the game remains the same as then; that it isn't different enough from the locust to bother, and there are plenty of other light mechs that I think would be more interesting.
#32
Posted 17 November 2016 - 01:35 PM
Mark Nicholson, on 17 November 2016 - 01:31 PM, said:
My personal opinion on its inclusion in the game remains the same as then; that it isn't different enough from the locust to bother, and there are plenty of other light mechs that I think would be more interesting.
Well, it's still more different from the Locust, than the IIC mechs are from the IS originals
#33
Posted 17 November 2016 - 02:16 PM
Want more of such streams in the future
Mark Nicholson, on 17 November 2016 - 01:31 PM, said:
My personal opinion on its inclusion in the game remains the same as then; that it isn't different enough from the locust to bother, and there are plenty of other light mechs that I think would be more interesting.
Aww. I so want it Maybe make some signature changes or something to make it more different.
Also the Flea can have possible more weapons, many wants it, it have higher mounts and shorter side profile aaaand somewhat slower than the Locust, even the hero with MASC cant possible break the game engine as I see it.
Edited by Tordin, 17 November 2016 - 02:24 PM.
#34
Posted 18 November 2016 - 08:46 AM
#35
Posted 18 November 2016 - 10:06 AM
#36
Posted 18 November 2016 - 11:38 AM
#37
Posted 21 November 2016 - 03:02 PM
Mark Nicholson, on 17 November 2016 - 01:31 PM, said:
My personal opinion on its inclusion in the game remains the same as then; that it isn't different enough from the locust to bother, and there are plenty of other light mechs that I think would be more interesting.
You did a terrific job with your Flea, but I agree there are many other lights that should come first (Wasp, Javelin, Raptor...)
Edited by Odanan, 21 November 2016 - 03:20 PM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users