59 replies to this topic

[Hunka Junk]

What have you asked about that got the #MechCon response?

I know that the devs would never just use #MechCon with no actual intent of actually answering certain questions, but these are busy people who might forget a question or two or three that were supposed to be answered at #MechCon.

I, for one, would like to see the whole list of questions that got #MechConned, have them all in one place, and be able to confirm that all they all actually got answered.

Edited by Hunka Junk, 01 December 2016 - 02:49 PM.

[Mcgral18]

A quick search of his history

Skill tree (Modules)
https://twitter.com/...389481928892416

"Save as much info for MechCon"
https://twitter.com/...126344922861568

"Lots of interesting Mechwarrior news"
https://twitter.com/...439508633821184

"Balance Items"
https://twitter.com/...444143918583808

"Are we gonna see dramatic improvements?"
"MechCon"
https://twitter.com/...233445992267776

"What's in the works?"
"mechcon"
https://twitter.com/...721383339016192

[BLOOD WOLF]

my god, these threads never stop.

[BlueFlames]

BLOOD WOLF, on 01 December 2016 - 03:07 PM, said:

my god, these threads never stop.

It's what happens when you burn the goodwill of your audience/community.

[Mcgral18]

BLOOD WOLF, on 01 December 2016 - 03:07 PM, said:

my god, these threads never stop.

This is a good one

It means only rightfully identified items will be held against him, not that 50 new maps aren't being worked on (or whichever hope)

[Akillius]

BLOOD WOLF, on 01 December 2016 - 03:07 PM, said:

my god, these threads never stop.

I'm sure Bloodwolf will confirm that the two of us are often at loggerheads on pretty much all subjects and no matter what game forum...
So it comes as a great surprise to me (and probably him) that I agree with his comment whole heartedly.

[Hunka Junk]

Yes, there's nothing wrong with accountability. It should be win/win.

[TheBlackMegadeus]

try as you might DisappointmentCon is going to be a huge gaping disappointment.

[SoloidSnake]

BLOOD WOLF, on 01 December 2016 - 03:07 PM, said:

my god, these threads never stop.

Is someone pointing a gun at your head forcing you to read all these #Mechcon threads? Or are you just being a masochist?

[Carl Vickers]

SoloidSnake, on 01 December 2016 - 04:38 PM, said:

Is someone pointing a gun at your head forcing you to read all these #Mechcon threads? Or are you just being a masochist?

[REDACTED]

Add to that, he just wants some attention.

More adds, wont be able to see his reply as he is on ignore, yay!

Edited by Ibrandul Mike, 02 December 2016 - 05:24 PM.
Insult redacted.

[Davers]

Hunka Junk, on 01 December 2016 - 02:41 PM, said:

What have you asked about that got the #MechCon response?

I know that the devs would never just use #MechCon with no actual intent of actually answering certain questions, but these are busy people who might forget a question or two or three that were supposed to be answered at #MechCon.

I, for one, would like to see the whole list of questions that got #MechConned, have them all in one place, and be able to confirm that all they all actually got answered.

How many questions fall under the presentation though?

[Johnny Z]

Are the rumours of Aerotech true?

[BLOOD WOLF]

Johnny Z, on 01 December 2016 - 07:37 PM, said:

Are the rumours of Aerotech true?

knowing these forums......................no

[Dino Might]

Aerotech would bring me back to the game, even if it sucked. I'd much rather fly an aerospace fighter and have insignificant impact in the game.

But there is no way they are implementing user-controlled fighters/bombers. First-off, the maps would need to be much, much bigger than even the largest CW map. Also, it wouldn't be a good use of resources unless they were to go with my idea for the massive persistent environment battles for CW.

[Bombast]

Johnny Z, on 01 December 2016 - 07:37 PM, said:

Are the rumours of Aerotech true?

'Rumor' is a fairly grandiose term for the deluded ramblings of a single poster who, delightful as he may be, came up with the notion of MWO Aerotech during an alcohol fueled dream.

[LordNothing]

it will either be something terrible, or something so great that pgi will be unable to pull it off.

[Scandinavian Jawbreaker]

SoloidSnake, on 01 December 2016 - 04:38 PM, said:

Is someone pointing a gun at your head forcing you to read all these #Mechcon threads? Or are you just being a masochist?

I identify as masochist just by logging in to these forums. Brown sea never disappoints

[Chuck Jager]

TheBlackMegadeus, on 01 December 2016 - 03:22 PM, said:

try as you might DisappointmentCon is going to be a huge gaping disappointment.

You met my ex, but forgot a few other more descriptive words for the gape.

[Mister Blastman]

Should I even care about any of this?

[Peter2k]

Dino Might, on 01 December 2016 - 07:45 PM, said:

Aerotech would bring me back to the game, even if it sucked. I'd much rather fly an aerospace fighter and have insignificant impact in the game.

But there is no way they are implementing user-controlled fighters/bombers. First-off, the maps would need to be much, much bigger than even the largest CW map. Also, it wouldn't be a good use of resources unless they were to go with my idea for the massive persistent environment battles for CW.

BLOOD WOLF, on 01 December 2016 - 07:40 PM, said:

knowing these forums......................no

Johnny Z, on 01 December 2016 - 07:37 PM, said:

Are the rumours of Aerotech true?

You're BS'ing, right?

Just because Novokaine started his rumblings about a dream, like a month or 2 ago and has been persistent about his trolling sarcasm, doesn't mean it's any kind of rumor

BLOOD WOLF, on 01 December 2016 - 03:07 PM, said:

my god, these threads never stop.

It's not like you have to comment on every one of those threads or even click on it
Like you didn't know what's it's going to be about ;-)

Also giving a blanket statement "wait for MechCon" leaves very little positive to talk about

Edited by Peter2k, 02 December 2016 - 01:03 AM.