

What 'Mech do you hate, and why?
#1
Posted 10 December 2011 - 06:55 PM
What mech really got on my nerves, and why?
Simple answer? The Mother F**ng Thor. Really, I hated that thing. It all stemmed from MW3. For whatever reason, that mech gave me the most trouble! I think it had to do with how well balanced its fire power/rage + JJ’s was. So I really had a hard time working around it. Either way, till this day I still wont pilot the Thor..
Now the Loki on the other hand…
any way! what mechs did you hate, and why?
#2
Posted 10 December 2011 - 07:36 PM
#3
Posted 10 December 2011 - 07:42 PM
With me its not being able to make some work with my play style. if i have to pick one it'll be the Dasher for look reasons with its arms pointing up but the lower arm is bent facing you. looks silly in my opinion.
#4
Posted 10 December 2011 - 07:45 PM
-SS
#5
Posted 10 December 2011 - 07:47 PM
#7
Posted 10 December 2011 - 08:03 PM
#8
Posted 10 December 2011 - 08:03 PM
The_Birdeater, on 10 December 2011 - 07:52 PM, said:
Ha! I doubled a thred! how taboo of me. Ah well, here you guys can have this:
http://omigir.devian...Orion-273363616
Left to right
Thor: Loki, Ur small
Loki: Ur a D##K, Thor
Zeus: Both of you, Shut up!
Orion: Hey guys!
#9
#10
Posted 10 December 2011 - 08:14 PM
#11
Posted 10 December 2011 - 09:25 PM
not for the mech itself, its an excellent mech that looks great, but because of the people who pilot it.
you almost never see some newbie in a shadowcat. No. Its always some dude with unit tags/rank 8 characters or more long who's been driving that shadowcat variant longer than most people spend on their formal educations.
you never see a shadowcat coming at you and think, "aha, easy pickings," no matter if you are in an atlas or madcat or whatever. No, that shadowcat is almost always going to tear you a new one or at the minimum badly mangle you before going down.
damn those shadowcat pilots, i hate them so much.
part of it is their arm profiles are tiny when facing you in a circle of death, which makes de-arming them difficult, they are fast enough to dodge fire and stay out of twist range on certain mechs, heavy enough to carry fire power capable of worrying any mech class, and armored just enough to brawl. They are totally in the Goldilocks zone of efficiency.
Edited by VYCanis, 10 December 2011 - 09:30 PM.
#12
Posted 10 December 2011 - 10:12 PM
#14
Posted 10 December 2011 - 11:16 PM
#15
Posted 10 December 2011 - 11:45 PM
LS1Zig, on 10 December 2011 - 10:12 PM, said:
They have hosed every fan of the series... DX< i think they hit trouble with the Warhammer in the Mechwarrior V trailor too, didnt they?
#16
Posted 10 December 2011 - 11:54 PM
To pilot: I agree with Omigir on Fireflys. I like fast, agile 'mechs but the lack of torso twist combined with paper-thin armor and almost no ability to mount substantial weapons just made it a death trap.
#17
Posted 11 December 2011 - 12:13 AM
Iron Horse, on 10 December 2011 - 11:54 PM, said:
To pilot: I agree with Omigir on Fireflys. I like fast, agile 'mechs but the lack of torso twist combined with paper-thin armor and almost no ability to mount substantial weapons just made it a death trap.
Than final fight in MW3, i got knocked on my *** so many times by Annihilators.. so yup, add that to my list for sure!
#18
Posted 11 December 2011 - 12:32 AM
#19
Posted 11 December 2011 - 01:02 AM
#20
Posted 11 December 2011 - 08:05 AM
In the board game I just don't like the Hermes II with the exception of one prototype design far into the future. I just don't understand designs where the one big gun is the AC/5.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users