Dedicated Youtubers For Mwo
#1
Posted 10 January 2017 - 04:17 AM
#3
Posted 10 January 2017 - 09:10 AM
#4
Posted 10 January 2017 - 09:23 AM
MacClearly, on 10 January 2017 - 09:10 AM, said:
SideStrafe still does the occasional video for MWO, but he has expressed his... Displeasure... On more than one occasion.
Hell he just did one a few weeks ago talking about MW5:M.
#5
Posted 10 January 2017 - 09:56 AM
MW2-3-4 and LL are so far superior to MWO. That is without counting the false promises, feature that never came and upcoming stuff that offers less than what MWO already offers. As a player and a fan of the BT franchise, never I`d stream this farce.
Like TotalBiscuit said on you tube, MWO has ``Problems``
he is a fan of the franchise but doesn't play the game...
Edited by TheLuc, 10 January 2017 - 09:57 AM.
#6
Posted 10 January 2017 - 06:18 PM
TheLuc, on 10 January 2017 - 09:56 AM, said:
MW2-3-4 and LL are so far superior to MWO. That is without counting the false promises, feature that never came and upcoming stuff that offers less than what MWO already offers. As a player and a fan of the BT franchise, never I`d stream this farce.
Like TotalBiscuit said on you tube, MWO has ``Problems``
he is a fan of the franchise but doesn't play the game...
I don't stream but I post videos. I often make fun of the game for being watered down MechWarrior while I play the game how I want to. I get some negative comments and "why didn't you"s but my main answer is because I'm having fun and I don't consider this game quite up there with MW3 and MW4.
What I have found surprising is many of my MW3 uploads will receive more views than MWO. That shows issues for MWO when a game that lost server support in 2008 can draw more attention.
#7
Posted 10 January 2017 - 06:27 PM
TheLuc, on 10 January 2017 - 09:56 AM, said:
MW2-3-4 and LL are so far superior to MWO. That is without counting the false promises, feature that never came and upcoming stuff that offers less than what MWO already offers. As a player and a fan of the BT franchise, never I`d stream this farce.
Like TotalBiscuit said on you tube, MWO has ``Problems``
he is a fan of the franchise but doesn't play the game...
I am having a blast running with the (MS) crew. I might actually start streaming... when my wife stops her Netflix addiction.
#8
Posted 10 January 2017 - 09:12 PM
TheLuc, on 10 January 2017 - 09:56 AM, said:
MW2-3-4 and LL are so far superior to MWO. That is without counting the false promises, feature that never came and upcoming stuff that offers less than what MWO already offers. As a player and a fan of the BT franchise, never I`d stream this farce.
Like TotalBiscuit said on you tube, MWO has ``Problems``
he is a fan of the franchise but doesn't play the game...
See, I disagree. I think MWO is a "good" game. It is even a good MechWarrior game. It is just not a great game and that is what people expected based on the hype and the pre-release information. PGI just set unrealistic goals for themselves and set the bar for peoples expectations way too high thus the cynicism-angst-disappointment-frustration-anger and salt from some of those that expected so much more.
#10
Posted 11 January 2017 - 04:13 AM
Rampage, on 10 January 2017 - 09:12 PM, said:
See, I disagree. I think MWO is a "good" game. It is even a good MechWarrior game. It is just not a great game and that is what people expected based on the hype and the pre-release information. PGI just set unrealistic goals for themselves and set the bar for peoples expectations way too high thus the cynicism-angst-disappointment-frustration-anger and salt from some of those that expected so much more.
so Mech Assault tier.
#12
Posted 11 January 2017 - 06:29 PM
Alan Davion, on 10 January 2017 - 09:23 AM, said:
SideStrafe still does the occasional video for MWO, but he has expressed his... Displeasure... On more than one occasion.
Hell he just did one a few weeks ago talking about MW5:M.
Just a paid advertisement for PGI...
Comments like his Good friend Bombadil, his fully paid trip by PGI etc, paid shill?
Then the contradictions (lies), he states he met the MWO sound guy who is also working on MW5 chatted about the diff engines..
then the comment, ohh dont worry about MWO not being further developed TWO different teams working on it.. wait..i say what? he states two i say TWO different teams working on it but the sound engineer is working on both??
Clearly not Two different teams, did he miss this or clearly misleading?.
PGI at it again telling you things like Two different teams working on the two games when clearly they are not,, whats the word for that??
#13
Posted 11 January 2017 - 06:34 PM
N0MAD, on 11 January 2017 - 06:29 PM, said:
Comments like his Good friend Bombadil, his fully paid trip by PGI etc, paid shill?
Then the contradictions (lies), he states he met the MWO sound guy who is also working on MW5 chatted about the diff engines..
then the comment, ohh dont worry about MWO not being further developed TWO different teams working on it.. wait..i say what? he states two i say TWO different teams working on it but the sound engineer is working on both??
Clearly not Two different teams, did he miss this or clearly misleading?.
PGI at it again telling you things like Two different teams working on the two games when clearly they are not,, whats the word for that??
I wasn't commenting on the content of SideStrafe's video, merely commenting to another poster that SideStrafe hasn't abandoned making MWO videos, just that they've become fewer and farther between than they used to be.
#14
Posted 13 January 2017 - 02:30 AM
Rampage, on 10 January 2017 - 09:12 PM, said:
See, I disagree. I think MWO is a "good" game. It is even a good MechWarrior game. It is just not a great game and that is what people expected based on the hype and the pre-release information. PGI just set unrealistic goals for themselves and set the bar for peoples expectations way too high thus the cynicism-angst-disappointment-frustration-anger and salt from some of those that expected so much more.
It doesn't need to be a good game. It just needs to be a good YouTube game. For a game to succeed in YouTube it needs a big core audience, which MWO doesn't have, but it also needs to be viewable --- similar requirements eSports and for Twitch.
There are things that distract MWO from being a good YouTube game.
Sometimes maps are too cloudy and too dark, with poor visibility. Videos are meant to be seen, so things inside it need to be seen.
Games cannot be too short, which can happen often in the case of MWO. If you can find a good even pug vs. pug event in FW, maybe you can find material there.
Without good YouTubers --- which is a free advertising on itself --- you would also have difficulty attracting new players. I am introduced to new games by YouTube.
You need the ability to record replays and send them in a file. So you can send your best games to YouTubers who can comment and post your play into YouTube. This has a collateral effect that you can send replays of suspected cheaters to company support for determination and action.
Presentation is important. Aesthetics is important. A game that looks good, will look good in YouTube. If you got crap graphics, crap textures, crap map design, its not going to look good.
#16
Posted 17 June 2023 - 04:01 AM
#17
Posted 17 June 2023 - 07:50 AM
You should include a link to your channel - people are lazy and won't use the YT search engine (that is bad btw, so they might not even find you if they do).
#18
Posted 17 June 2023 - 08:42 AM
#19
Posted 17 June 2023 - 12:48 PM
I'm by no means a youtuber as I rarely upload videos,never promote,don't use or look for sponsors or any of the other things a successful yt channel does. I just upload when I feel like it what ever catches my fancy and make it public so if others see it and like it good for them.
#20
Posted 17 June 2023 - 07:36 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users