Jump to content

Man, I Would Really, Really Like To See This "statistical Data" That Balancing Is Based On.


  • You cannot reply to this topic
21 replies to this topic

#21 cazidin

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 2
  • FP Veteran - Beta 2
  • 4,259 posts

Posted 22 January 2017 - 08:10 AM

View Postbluesmith, on 22 January 2017 - 06:37 AM, said:

I suspect the data is withheld because it will highlight the p2w aspects of the game. Even if it's not intended, and even if there are many examples to the contrary, it only really takes one instance of a cash shop or MC-only mech with a high win/loss or k/d ratio to ruin the game's reputation. That's what they're afraid of happening.


And I suspect the data is withheld for one of two reasons. Either there actually isn't much of it, or the system used is flawed, not in a P2W sense, but in an imperical, this is a bad idea, what are you doing PGI? sense.

#22 jonfett

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 355 posts
  • LocationSitting on a NaCl mountain in a place called Puglandia

Posted 22 January 2017 - 11:31 AM

View Postcazidin, on 22 January 2017 - 08:10 AM, said:


And I suspect the data is withheld for one of two reasons. Either there actually isn't much of it, or the system used is flawed, not in a P2W sense, but in an imperical, this is a bad idea, what are you doing PGI? sense.


Lol...they are probably using some old punchcard based mainframe that they bought for a bag of cheetos.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users