Jump to content

- - - - -

Is Lbx

Question

41 replies to this topic

#21 Alexander of Macedon

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 1,184 posts

Posted 16 April 2017 - 01:41 PM

Iraqi, your argument only makes sense when shooting against large numbers of small components (i.e. a ST full of medium lasers and jumpjets). If you're shooting, say, a CTF's RT with a MLas and AC/20 or DHS and AC/10, the vast majority of your pellets are going to hit the big weapon.

LBXes are more reliable for critting out high-priority internal targets. The only point where they draw even is something like shooting into an open and damaged rear CT with an AC/20 or a LB-20X, it's basically a guaranteed kill on hit either way (though the LBX is more likely to hit if it's a snapshot).

Furthermore, the higher crit chance and thus total damage of an LBX over an AC when firing into structure benefits damage transfer, which helps kill the structure faster.

Edited by Alexander of Macedon, 16 April 2017 - 01:42 PM.


#22 Koniving

    Welcoming Committee

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Guide
  • The Guide
  • 23,384 posts

Posted 16 April 2017 - 01:58 PM

View PostIraqiWalker, on 16 April 2017 - 12:07 PM, said:

You fire an LBX at the enemy ST. That's 10 pellets, let's say of those 8 hit the location (a near impossibility except at point blank range)

Near impossible situation...
Demonstrated as easily possible
Here's 20 pellets hitting one location.
...Repeatedly.


You just need to...
Posted Image

Edited by Koniving, 16 April 2017 - 01:59 PM.


#23 IraqiWalker

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • 9,682 posts
  • LocationCalifornia

Posted 19 April 2017 - 04:42 PM

View PostAlexander of Macedon, on 16 April 2017 - 01:41 PM, said:

Iraqi, your argument only makes sense when shooting against large numbers of small components (i.e. a ST full of medium lasers and jumpjets). If you're shooting, say, a CTF's RT with a MLas and AC/20 or DHS and AC/10, the vast majority of your pellets are going to hit the big weapon.

LBXes are more reliable for critting out high-priority internal targets. The only point where they draw even is something like shooting into an open and damaged rear CT with an AC/20 or a LB-20X, it's basically a guaranteed kill on hit either way (though the LBX is more likely to hit if it's a snapshot).

Furthermore, the higher crit chance and thus total damage of an LBX over an AC when firing into structure benefits damage transfer, which helps kill the structure faster.

Even then, you'd rather be using the Single shot weapons, since when they crit, they will kill the internal component. Period.

Because at the end of the day:
If the AC 10 crits, it insta kills the internal component.

Whereas with the LBX if it crits, it's not gauranteed to kill the component at all (will take you up to 3 shots to kill an LBX in that CTF-ST if not more).

So, 1-2 shots, or 3+. My math may be rusty, but the one that takes fewer shots to do the job is the better choice.

Consistently, the single shot weapons are more effective than the spread shot weapons at killing internals. Simply because when they crit, they guarantee a destruction.

View PostKoniving, on 16 April 2017 - 01:58 PM, said:

Near impossible situation...
Demonstrated as easily possible
Here's 20 pellets hitting one location.
...Repeatedly.


You just need to...
Posted Image


Kon, that was within <130 meters. That is practically point blank range.

Maybe I should have re-phrased it to "short range"?

Edited by IraqiWalker, 19 April 2017 - 04:44 PM.


#24 Athom83

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Death Wish
  • The Death Wish
  • 2,529 posts
  • LocationTFS Aurora, 1000km up.

Posted 20 April 2017 - 01:08 PM

Why use IS LB-10X? Because its the only heavy ballistic the IS has that can fit 2 in a single ST. *I count the UAC/5 as a medium ballistic*. Anything 55 tons and up with 2 ST B-slots in the same ST can fit 2 LB-10Xs fairly well (without XL engine), but will lose side armaments until 65-70 ton range. Until we get more mechs with spread out Ballistics slots (Bushwacker, Mauler, upcomming Annihilator are all good starts), its really the only way to fit the big dakka.

#25 S 0 L E N Y A

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 2,031 posts
  • LocationWest Side

Posted 20 April 2017 - 03:56 PM

crap weapon outside of certain builds that pair them with SRM4s for brawling.

Horribly useless weapon past 300 meters. The spread is terrible, even when within optimal range.

Best thing about the LBX is the way it sounds.

There is a good reason you do not see this weapon much at higher levels of play.

#26 the sixth tier

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • Little Helper
  • 50 posts

Posted 22 April 2017 - 12:26 AM

one thing i noticed is people tend to duck for cover pretty quick when you shoot them with it.

#27 IraqiWalker

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • 9,682 posts
  • LocationCalifornia

Posted 22 April 2017 - 09:26 AM

View Postthe sixth tier, on 22 April 2017 - 12:26 AM, said:

one thing i noticed is people tend to duck for cover pretty quick when you shoot them with it.

Generally, people will duck for cover when getting shot at. Especially with ballistics that cause cockpit shake.

#28 stealthraccoon

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Urban Commando
  • Urban Commando
  • 1,497 posts
  • Locationnestled in a burlap sack, down in the root cellar

Posted 02 May 2017 - 09:49 PM

View PostIraqiWalker, on 22 April 2017 - 09:26 AM, said:

Generally, people will duck for cover when getting shot at. Especially with ballistics that cause cockpit shake.

Yep, AC2's inspire much fear, even at max range.

#29 The Jerol

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • Survivor
  • 59 posts
  • LocationNorthern California (Inner Sphere)

Posted 02 May 2017 - 10:17 PM

View PostVlad Striker, on 10 April 2017 - 11:04 AM, said:

Try CN9-D for the next two weeks because after that it's getting nerfed into oblivion...



Fixed.

#30 The Basilisk

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Mercenary
  • The Mercenary
  • 3,270 posts
  • LocationFrankfurt a.M.

Posted 03 May 2017 - 12:18 AM

Why use an IS LB-X AC10:

-- you can mount two in one torso --> hardpointcount

-- cool weapon with good refire rate

-- normal AC10 has a slow muzzle velocity that will cause you to be even more inable to concentrate fire on single locations than with LBX..except on short ranges where the LBX is cooler, lighter and smaler than the AC10

-- AC10 does not mix well with other weapons --> projectile speed and convergence
LB-X is perfect with SRMs

-- extra dmg versus unarmored--> more money and fast finishing moves

-- kills lots of components --> more money

-- enemys with lots of ammo go FZZZzzzzzt BOooOM --> lotsmoney since the ammo explosion dmg goes on the account of the one who ignited said ammo.

-- effective against light...even the most distorted hitboxes do not help against spread

-- high projectile speed --> good for medranged suppressionfire

#31 godmonkey

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • The Butcher
  • The Butcher
  • 160 posts
  • LocationFinland/Sweden

Posted 03 May 2017 - 12:58 AM

well i use the LBX 10 both clan and IS in a number of builds. The IS LB is an excellent weapon that you can keep firing even if your heat is at 90+ without you shutting down or taking overheat damage if you play with override on. That said its a weapon best used in pairs.

As an example of a very strong LBX build for the IS is the warhammer 6R with 2XPPC and 2xLBX10 all fitted in the torso mounts leaving the arms free and it also has zero burn time so you can twist right after you fire. The non ER PPCs are suprisingly cool running compared to the ER versions making the mech a very strong mid range mech that gets very deadly right around the 150m mark. I run a lot of brawler builds so the 150m is nothing strange for me.

Another good one is a Jagermech 6A with 4 x SRM4 with artemis and 2 x lbx10. Its a cool running monster that can pump out DPS like no tomorrow.

The absolute best part with the LBX's is the fact that in the late game they really wreck face when everyone is opened up and you can always keep fighting where other builds cannot due to heat. Sure on range they aren't super good due to the spread but folks will still put their heads down when the pellets fly. They also get suprisingly much ammo so you rarely need more then 4 tons for 2 guns making it very nice on that regard.

And after the UAC jam nerf they have become a more viable weapon system then ever before.

Edited by godmonkey, 03 May 2017 - 12:59 AM.


#32 Napoleon_Blownapart

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Shredder
  • Shredder
  • 1,167 posts

Posted 03 May 2017 - 02:56 PM

oddly my ac10 grouped with an ac5 gets hotter than 4 lbx10s and 4 shotguns are just fun.during a recent event i killed the escort atlas with 1 alpha and only got an 81 match score i was like wtf?Posted Image

#33 Rogue Jedi

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Overlord
  • Overlord
  • 4,908 posts
  • LocationSuffolk, England

Posted 03 May 2017 - 03:22 PM

View PostGorantir, on 03 May 2017 - 02:56 PM, said:

oddly my ac10 grouped with an ac5 gets hotter than 4 lbx10s and 4 shotguns are just fun.during a recent event i killed the escort atlas with 1 alpha and only got an 81 match score i was like wtf?Posted Image

match score is based upon many things, but a significant part is 1 point of match score for every 2 points of damage, the VIP does not seem to count as damage done for match score, so you only got points for your other achevements in that match.
if killing the VIP Atlas, also I assume many others were shooting at the VIP as last I checked that Mech had about 400 hitpoints on the rear CT

#34 IraqiWalker

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • 9,682 posts
  • LocationCalifornia

Posted 04 May 2017 - 03:49 PM

View PostRogue Jedi, on 03 May 2017 - 03:22 PM, said:

last I checked that Mech had about 400 hitpoints on the rear CT

That's a LOT of HP. Then again, it does need it on account of having a brain dead A.I.

#35 TheFourthAlly

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Moon
  • The Moon
  • 209 posts
  • LocationMelbs, Oz

Posted 04 May 2017 - 08:59 PM

View Postgodmonkey, on 03 May 2017 - 12:58 AM, said:



As an example of a very strong LBX build for the IS is the warhammer 6R with 2XPPC and 2xLBX10 all fitted in the torso mounts leaving the arms free and it also has zero burn time so you can twist right after you fire. The non ER PPCs are suprisingly cool running compared to the ER versions making the mech a very strong mid range mech that gets very deadly right around the 150m mark. I run a lot of brawler builds so the 150m is nothing strange for me.

Do you have a smurfy link or more detailed build (engine?) on that? I have a WHM 6R and a love/hate relationship with PPCs (fun to hit with, do not seem to hurt the reds all that much at times, dunno) but combining them with these LBX seems something worth a try.

#36 IraqiWalker

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • 9,682 posts
  • LocationCalifornia

Posted 05 May 2017 - 03:22 PM

View PostTheFourthAlly, on 04 May 2017 - 08:59 PM, said:

Do you have a smurfy link or more detailed build (engine?) on that? I have a WHM 6R and a love/hate relationship with PPCs (fun to hit with, do not seem to hurt the reds all that much at times, dunno) but combining them with these LBX seems something worth a try.

I would imagine it's something like this, at least that's the most fragile, and slow I'd go for with a set up like that.

#37 TheFourthAlly

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Moon
  • The Moon
  • 209 posts
  • LocationMelbs, Oz

Posted 05 May 2017 - 10:54 PM

View PostIraqiWalker, on 05 May 2017 - 03:22 PM, said:

I would imagine it's something like this, at least that's the most fragile, and slow I'd go for with a set up like that.


Ta. On my phone atm, will have to see when I get a chance to muck about with the mechlab again.

Edited by TheFourthAlly, 05 May 2017 - 10:54 PM.


#38 godmonkey

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • The Butcher
  • The Butcher
  • 160 posts
  • LocationFinland/Sweden

Posted 07 May 2017 - 09:46 AM

almost. the build i run is like this
http://mwo.smurfy-ne...44b6d078dc2dc73

i didn't muck about with the rear armor but i run like 2 or 4 points

Edited by godmonkey, 07 May 2017 - 09:47 AM.


#39 TheFourthAlly

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Moon
  • The Moon
  • 209 posts
  • LocationMelbs, Oz

Posted 07 May 2017 - 05:28 PM

View Postgodmonkey, on 07 May 2017 - 09:46 AM, said:

almost. the build i run is like this
http://mwo.smurfy-ne...44b6d078dc2dc73

i didn't muck about with the rear armor but i run like 2 or 4 points

And cheers to you too. I'll give that a whirl sometime in future when the new place has internet.

#40 TooDumbToQuit

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Death Wish
  • 1,539 posts

Posted 11 May 2017 - 10:16 AM

I've been rethinking my LBX only policy. As I try to hit certain torsos better, I'm thinking maybe the ACs are better for that.

Even with the Clan I still use the normal AC's, they do not jam and they run cooler (and some have better range)





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users