Jump to content

Nice P2W Mech You Released There Pgi


44 replies to this topic

#1 KAPPE8

    Member

  • PipPip
  • 41 posts
  • Locationnorth-east Italy

Posted 19 April 2017 - 12:03 AM

>+30 between structure and armor in the CT: CHECK
>broken hitboxes that dont register half the hits: CHECK
>high mounted hardpoints: CHECK
>shield arms: CHECK

nice p2w mech you released.
gotta please the golden whales before they cancel their preorders, right?
because who gives a shite about this game being balanced, the important thing is just to sell MechPacks™, right?

#2 Battlemaster56

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Pack Leader
  • Pack Leader
  • 2,907 posts
  • LocationOn the not so distant moon on Endor

Posted 19 April 2017 - 12:12 AM

Once I'm out of work I'll have a gif for this thread.

#3 BLOOD WOLF

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Jaws
  • The Jaws
  • 6,368 posts
  • Locationnowhere

Posted 19 April 2017 - 12:13 AM

maybe you should have thought this thread through.

don't worry, there is a even worse thread on the faction play forum(recently made) that's just a whine thread.

Edited by BLOOD WOLF, 19 April 2017 - 12:14 AM.


#4 The6thMessenger

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Nova Captain
  • Nova Captain
  • 8,104 posts
  • LocationFrom a distance in an Urbie with a HAG, delivering righteous fury to heretics.

Posted 19 April 2017 - 12:16 AM

View PostKAPPE8, on 19 April 2017 - 12:03 AM, said:

>+30 between structure and armor in the CT: CHECK
>broken hitboxes that dont register half the hits: CHECK
>high mounted hardpoints: CHECK
>shield arms: CHECK

nice p2w mech you released.
gotta please the golden whales before they cancel their preorders, right?
because who gives a shite about this game being balanced, the important thing is just to sell MechPacks™, right?


Are you sure, that's not just bad connection, or bad programming? I gotta admit, it does seem to be a glorified shadowhawk without the JJs, but still.


Calm down, it's only been out for about a single day. It's best to look at it from a broad perspective, and see how it does with the god-*******-damn stats.

#5 PyckenZot

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Mercenary Rank 7
  • Mercenary Rank 7
  • 870 posts
  • Google+: Link
  • Facebook: Link
  • Twitter: Link
  • LocationAnderlecht, Belgium

Posted 19 April 2017 - 12:21 AM

View PostKAPPE8, on 19 April 2017 - 12:03 AM, said:

>+30 between structure and armor in the CT: CHECK
>broken hitboxes that dont register half the hits: CHECK
>high mounted hardpoints: CHECK
>shield arms: CHECK

nice p2w mech you released.
gotta please the golden whales before they cancel their preorders, right?
because who gives a shite about this game being balanced, the important thing is just to sell MechPacks™, right?


Still outperformed by clan heavies.

#6 Carl Vickers

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Covert
  • The Covert
  • 2,649 posts
  • LocationPerth

Posted 19 April 2017 - 12:38 AM

View PostKAPPE8, on 19 April 2017 - 12:03 AM, said:

>+30 between structure and armor in the CT: CHECK
>broken hitboxes that dont register half the hits: CHECK
>high mounted hardpoints: CHECK
>shield arms: CHECK

nice p2w mech you released.
gotta please the golden whales before they cancel their preorders, right?
because who gives a shite about this game being balanced, the important thing is just to sell MechPacks™, right?


Posted Image

#7 Bishop Steiner

    ForumWarrior

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Hammer
  • The Hammer
  • 47,187 posts
  • Locationclimbing Mt Tryhard, one smoldering Meta-Mech corpse at a time

Posted 19 April 2017 - 12:46 AM

Lol......no

Cry harder?

#8 Lupis Volk

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Mercenary
  • Mercenary
  • 2,126 posts
  • LocationIn the cockpit of the nearest Light Battlemech.

Posted 19 April 2017 - 01:02 AM

I knew someone was gonna do this. Why not add that it's not "considered canon" by a select few with extremist views.

#9 Anjian

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 2
  • FP Veteran - Beta 2
  • 3,735 posts

Posted 19 April 2017 - 01:25 AM

View PostKAPPE8, on 19 April 2017 - 12:03 AM, said:

>+30 between structure and armor in the CT: CHECK
>broken hitboxes that dont register half the hits: CHECK
>high mounted hardpoints: CHECK
>shield arms: CHECK

nice p2w mech you released.
gotta please the golden whales before they cancel their preorders, right?
because who gives a shite about this game being balanced, the important thing is just to sell MechPacks™, right?



I am not sure why designing a mech right should be considered pay to win.

#10 Karl Marlow

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 2,277 posts

Posted 19 April 2017 - 01:31 AM

Excuse me good sure. I seem to be lost. Is this the traditional Roughneck is DOA thread?

#11 Dark Wooki33 IIC

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Demon
  • The Demon
  • 379 posts
  • LocationBlessed Saxony

Posted 19 April 2017 - 01:37 AM

View PostLupis Volk, on 19 April 2017 - 01:02 AM, said:

it's not "considered canon"

True.
But still not as bad as in WoT.

Roughneck is somewhat sturdy, maybe too sturdy.
Most of the good weapon quirks are only for the weapons with few hardpoint on the respective chassis ... so not really gamebreaking.

#12 Reverend Herring

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Philanthropist
  • Philanthropist
  • 124 posts
  • LocationFinland

Posted 19 April 2017 - 01:52 AM

Did I miss something? Is the Roughneck not going to be available for cBills in a couple months? If it will be though, then aren't all the 'mechs (apart from trials) technicaly Pay-to-Win?

#13 Pr8Dator2

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Trinary Star Captain
  • Trinary Star Captain
  • 250 posts
  • LocationCareer Clanner

Posted 19 April 2017 - 02:04 AM

Seriously, I didn't see any roughnecks winning so far... whining, yes, alot as I cut them down one after another helplessly... too big and heavy for a heavy, too lightly armed for one... how is that P2W?

#14 Reza Malin

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Overlord
  • Overlord
  • 617 posts
  • LocationUK

Posted 19 April 2017 - 02:16 AM

View PostKAPPE8, on 19 April 2017 - 12:03 AM, said:

>+30 between structure and armor in the CT: CHECK
>broken hitboxes that dont register half the hits: CHECK
>high mounted hardpoints: CHECK
>shield arms: CHECK

nice p2w mech you released.
gotta please the golden whales before they cancel their preorders, right?
because who gives a shite about this game being balanced, the important thing is just to sell MechPacks™, right?


Ok champ.....

#15 MechWarrior414712

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • CS 2024 Gold Champ
  • 449 posts

Posted 19 April 2017 - 02:17 AM

Don't worry el gato grande, best they can do is something like 4lpl or twin ac10 while your clan robots double that with no IS xl

But your point is right, if one is to run a 65t IS heavy then right now it should always be a Roughneck

#16 El Bandito

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Big Daddy
  • Big Daddy
  • 26,736 posts
  • LocationStill doing ungodly amount of damage, but with more accuracy.

Posted 19 April 2017 - 03:20 AM

Ok. I haven't played today but I do think 10 armor and 20 structure on CT of 65 ton mech is too much as durability quirks. I'd understand it if the Roughneck has bad hitboxes, but it has decent hitboxes. Offensive quirks are sub par, in return.

Guess this is PGI's way of making it feel like a tough industrial mech?

Edited by El Bandito, 19 April 2017 - 03:25 AM.


#17 Felix von Buelow

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 117 posts

Posted 19 April 2017 - 03:25 AM

It's neither pay nor win. Some people...

1st: It will be available for C-Bills in the summer
2nd: There are heavy mechs which are better in the same weight bracket (HBR, EBJ) and higher (WHM, GHR, TBR, etc)

#18 Elizander

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 7,540 posts
  • LocationPhilippines

Posted 19 April 2017 - 03:44 AM

Yeah, I was piloting my Kodiak 3/Marauder IIC and I felt really bad when I came across a Roughneck (I didn't). Posted Image

#19 Willard Phule

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The 1 Percent
  • The 1 Percent
  • 3,920 posts
  • LocationThe Omega Company compound on Outreach

Posted 19 April 2017 - 03:47 AM

Member since February 2017. He OBVIOUSLY hasn't been around long enough to see how the "pay for 2 months advantage" thing operates.

Won't he be shocked when he finds out the entire design gets beaten with the nerf bat prior to being released for cbills.....

#20 Chiasson Brinker

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Ace
  • The Ace
  • 260 posts
  • LocationWayside V

Posted 19 April 2017 - 03:55 AM

I played pretty extensively after patching last night and for one, I didn't see nearly as many Roughnecks as I was expecting (maybe 1 or 2 per match). Second, it's a fusion powered industrial mech, so what do you expect as far as durability is concerned for something designed to withstand having up to and including a small asteroid landing on it.

If the center torso quirks bug you so much, leg it and out turn it to go for the rear armour. I don't like venturing into "git gud" territory and maybe I'm jaded by having played the game for 5 years, but it sounds more like the OP has no clue what they're doing.

Edited by Aidan Kell, 19 April 2017 - 03:56 AM.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users