38 replies to this topic

[Moonlight Grimoire]

Shamelessly ripped from the front page, take a gander, looks good, love the helmet on the bugger.

Edit: Added new image PGI put up, thanks for putting up a second teaser image of it on the ground, it will help give an idea of how big it is. Too bad it wasn't standing next to a spider

Edited by Moonlight Grimoire, 04 May 2017 - 10:04 AM.

[Alex Morgaine]

Oooo birthday present for me :3

[Bishop Steiner]

Beat you to it!!! HAHA!

Eh. Anyhow. Yeah. Just as unimpressed as I was with the concept art. 0/10 glad I passed.

[Requiemking]

Bishop Steiner, on 03 May 2017 - 01:14 PM, said:

Beat you to it!!! HAHA!

Eh. Anyhow. Yeah. Just as unimpressed as I was with the concept art. 0/10 glad I passed.

Looks good to me. Proportions could use some work, but on the whole not bad. At least on the energy-based variants, you could run them as half-decent pokers.

[Magnus Santini]

Woo hoo! Makes me think of this.

[Moonlight Grimoire]

Bishop Steiner, on 03 May 2017 - 01:14 PM, said:

Beat you to it!!! HAHA!

Eh. Anyhow. Yeah. Just as unimpressed as I was with the concept art. 0/10 glad I passed.

Meh, doesn't matter too much to me who posted it first, matters that people see it one way or another. Just hope that people do like it. It should be half decent, another mech I want to pick up one of post civil war tech. Aka cbill version of, there are other mechs I am more interested in seeing come to MWO, like the Champion, Firefly, and Nightstar. Firefly being my latest flame, I want that sweet SLE variant, by the stars that would be a go to mech for me.

[C E Dwyer]

I want to see it in different camo and angles, but i'm not impressed so far.

Based soley on this picture it's looking like a refund request

[Jackal Noble]

Cathy, on 03 May 2017 - 01:35 PM, said:

I want to see it in different camo and angles, but i'm not impressed so far.

Based soley on this picture it's looking like a refund request

That's odd, as it's awfully close to the concept... just saying.

Edited by JackalBeast, 03 May 2017 - 01:41 PM.

[AnTi90d]

I'd like to see its scaling compared to a Firestarter and a Jenner.

It looks OK.. I'll probably pick a few up for Cbills if I'm still playing the game when it's opened up for purchase.

[Tordin]

Guess the good old firestarter will be a bit squatter/ lower in comparison.

[Moonlight Grimoire]

It should be spider sized, it is a 30 tonner, though it has a "deep" torso, so maybe it will be shorter? I am thinking spider size though.

[stealthraccoon]

I'm loving it!
Arms are disposable, in my opinion.

[Alex Morgaine]

Torso energy varients plus 240 or higher depending o.k. varient cap should be a good enough to build a runaroundmcbackstabby mech.

Missile ammo would be tight on the others though

[Requiemking]

Alex Morgaine, on 03 May 2017 - 03:14 PM, said:

Torso energy varients plus 240 or higher depending o.k. varient cap should be a good enough to build a runaroundmcbackstabby mech.

Missile ammo would be tight on the others though

Depends. I could see the 10N being armed with a couple MRM10s and maybe an RL or two depending on how much ammo per ton MRMs get.

[Bishop Steiner]

Requiemking, on 03 May 2017 - 01:16 PM, said:

Looks good to me. Proportions could use some work, but on the whole not bad. At least on the energy-based variants, you could run them as half-decent pokers.

that's what she said!

[Requiemking]

Bishop Steiner, on 03 May 2017 - 03:19 PM, said:

that's what she said!

-1000/10 bad pun.

[Bishop Steiner]

Requiemking, on 03 May 2017 - 03:21 PM, said:

-1000/10 bad pun.

bad puns are the best puns. Your punishment will continue.

[Requiemking]

Bishop Steiner, on 03 May 2017 - 03:22 PM, said:

bad puns are the best puns. Your punishment will continue.

My punishment is being treated like the boogyman every time I bring up any of the MK2's flaws.

Edited by Requiemking, 03 May 2017 - 03:24 PM.

[Bishop Steiner]

Requiemking, on 03 May 2017 - 03:24 PM, said:

My punishment is being treated like the boogyman every time I bring up any of the MK2's flaws.

maybe it's the way or frequency of your approach?

Maybe something a little more original would be at least entertaining. "Knockoff this? Knockoff that"? 0/10 critique or troll.

[Requiemking]

Bishop Steiner, on 03 May 2017 - 03:27 PM, said:

maybe it's the way or frequency of your approach?

Maybe something a little more original would be at least entertaining. "Knockoff this? Knockoff that"? 0/10 critique or troll.

I call that mech what it is. That's it.