Jump to content

Lawlz About Iic Hero Complaints


  • You cannot reply to this topic
23 replies to this topic

#21 razenWing

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Fearless
  • The Fearless
  • 1,694 posts

Posted 19 May 2017 - 09:04 PM

View PostEl Bandito, on 19 May 2017 - 08:58 PM, said:


You are using misguided argument, and then get upset when others correct you. I mean, you are as rabid as Gyrok when it comes to arguing, but I thought you at least had a brain, compared to him...

Bottom line is, yes, Hero mechs should be attractive enough to buy, but not to become blatant powercreep among its variants. However, omnimech and battlemchs are fundamentally different enough so that the argument about Hero mechs should not lump them together.


So it's okay to complain about IIC Heroes for underpowered. That's fair game.

Nope, still don't see the logic. Either they are all ok, are none of them are ok.

(oh and believe me, I am not upset one bit. if only I can type sarcasm, you will know how my face is more Posted Image than Posted Image )

(why does smilies not enlarge? and where is the condenscending smilie?)

Edited by razenWing, 19 May 2017 - 09:06 PM.


#22 JadePanther

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Liquid Metal
  • Liquid Metal
  • 967 posts

Posted 19 May 2017 - 09:17 PM

View Postsycocys, on 19 May 2017 - 08:43 PM, said:

Other than the Jenner, they just appear to be the standard fare hero mechs to me after I look them over.

Doubt the Jenner will amount to much, but 3 machine guns is still somewhat fun. Past that you get a c-bill bonus and a mech that has a somewhat different play concept than the c-bill counterparts. Pretty much the same in all the heroes after the Yen-Lo.

No they won't be uber meta, but the heroes shouldn't be anyhow they should just be mechs designed for the role the fictitious pilot that ran them had them set up to do. As long as they fall somewhere the middle of the mech battle value scale they are where they need to be.

Who knows, maybe someone at PGI actually considered some sort of balance when creating a mech for a change? Crazy, but possible.


ummm 3 MG?? try 6 HMG instead.. with how fast you can crit out someone now using 3-4 mg, that thing will be a troll monster i think..

#23 WrathOfDeadguy

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Pest
  • The Pest
  • 1,951 posts

Posted 19 May 2017 - 10:19 PM

Jenner that can run high-mounted UAC20... or I guess run HMGs and an LPL, if you're boring. I will not be boring. I will rocka that dakka all night long.

Hunchback that can run shoulder-level large energy with shoulder-level large ballistic, which is a Hunchback first (I will totally be running UAC20 plus Heavy Large on it- let's see any other Hunch even try that), and I'm totally claiming credit for the name.

Orion that's got MASC, and is therefore the fastest Orion.

Highlander that can... hover around and weep, I guess? Is that what Highlanders do these days?

#24 Jay Leon Hart

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Spear
  • The Spear
  • 4,669 posts

Posted 20 May 2017 - 03:14 AM

View PostrazenWing, on 19 May 2017 - 06:54 PM, said:

Made them too good, like Invasion I and II, and people whine about it being p2w.

Make them too bad, and people b7tch about it about not worth the money,

There's no win for PGI, is there?

See PGI, this is why you should ALWAYS ignore those ******* that say you are p2w, cause at least the people will buy your mechs. Cause now, no one will buy the new heroes. If you are going to be b7tched at no matter what, just take the win then.

PS: Personal Message to Whiners: It's time to prove your dedication like you guys have ALWAYS claimed during the p2w fake scandal that you guys came up with. Go buy those crappy crappy IIC heroes. Show your support!

Well.....
I called out the P2W of some Clan Heroes
I called out the P2W of some Resistance Heroes
I called out the P2W of some Clan Heroes II
I'm buying the JR7-IIC-FY and probably the HBK-IIC-DW, so... quit yer bitchin' ?





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users