Faction Play And The Complainers
#1
Posted 29 May 2017 - 03:02 PM
PD:Even with solo queue on FP, good players will dominate matches and get 5K scores Ez due to the amount of potatoes ( and recent armor increase overall) and dont forget about sync drop
#2
Posted 29 May 2017 - 03:04 PM
#3
Posted 29 May 2017 - 03:11 PM
#4
Posted 29 May 2017 - 03:13 PM
Vxheous Kerensky, on 29 May 2017 - 03:04 PM, said:
hey last night i send you a message in game and even went to the TS, your guy launch too fast
BTW i dance dat **** all the time bruuuuhhh SABOR LATINO [color=#000000]
ƪ(˘⌣˘)┐ ƪ(˘⌣˘)ʃ ┌(˘⌣˘)ʃ
[/color]#5
Posted 29 May 2017 - 03:13 PM
#8
Posted 29 May 2017 - 07:36 PM
Vxheous Kerensky, on 29 May 2017 - 03:04 PM, said:
haha I can see Sexy rockin' out in his chair to that right now doing the singalong and all.
Leggin Ho, on 29 May 2017 - 03:13 PM, said:
I got reported for "harrasment" over the weekend & I can only think of two games where there was any "abuse" flung given the amount of teams we played and all the good games against good people mostly.
I guess that is what you get for playing well these days. People just wanna bait you, abuse you for "hacking" and then report you for defending yourself by bringing you down for being better than them
#9
Posted 29 May 2017 - 07:43 PM
#10
Posted 29 May 2017 - 07:45 PM
I'll have to record all my matches now if this whats going to happen
#11
Posted 29 May 2017 - 07:49 PM
#12
Posted 03 June 2017 - 02:12 AM
#13
Posted 03 June 2017 - 07:09 AM
This sounds like another gitgud CW is fine propaganda post
Good luck populating a mode where only the top players can win.
#14
Posted 03 June 2017 - 07:23 AM
Hence the frustration with people who refuse to do so. All of us did.
#15
Posted 03 June 2017 - 07:42 AM
Monkey Lover, on 03 June 2017 - 07:09 AM, said:
This sounds like another gitgud CW is fine propaganda post
Good luck populating a mode where only the top players can win.
Lol did I say I was tier 1 when I started to try CW?
#16
Posted 03 June 2017 - 07:53 AM
WayTooSexy, on 03 June 2017 - 07:42 AM, said:
You still got to tier 1 lots of people can't get there they will never be at this level and there is nothing wrong with this. A unit doesn't turn people into winning machines.
People just say this so it makes it ok to farm lower skilled teams.
This mode needs a basic match maker and there is 100% no reason it shouldn't.
#17
Posted 03 June 2017 - 08:37 AM
Monkey Lover, on 03 June 2017 - 07:53 AM, said:
People just say this so it makes it ok to farm lower skilled teams.
This mode needs a basic match maker and there is 100% no reason it shouldn't.
That is just flat out wrong, in every single comment you made. I am not a very good solo player and when I drop in CW and decide to go off on my own and see how I can fair in some random 1v1 duels, I often get beat. Yet when I stick with my team and we work together, we win almost all the time. Your statement that a unit doesn't turn people into winning machines is just flat out wrong and our unit as well as many others proves it. Granted, just because you put 12 people together with the same tags doesn't mean you will win all the time, you actually have to put in a little work of moving together and supporting each other but it's not different than if you did this with 12 randoms. If 12 randoms got together and worked as a team, they would be a winning machine. The problem isn't the individual players on a team are bad, it's that they are selfish, unwilling to work with the team and are too focused on their own personal performance. They would rather do 2K plus damage than share their armor or move up with the team and support a push etc etc.
It is ok to farm lower skilled teams if those teams sign up to play in a mode that was designed to not have a matchmaker and pit you against whoever shows up at your doorstep. What are we supposed to do, charge the enemy backwards? eject our first wave? (we have done that before btw and were praised by some for doing it and called elitist jerks by others). No, you drop in CW, you take the risk of playing against some very good, well coordinated teams.
There are lots of reasons for not putting a matchmaker in CW, you just chose to ignore all of those reasons. Too low of population, difficult to code (possibly, I have no idea really, just heard it said around a few times), lack of resources from PGI and pitting people against whoever you come up against is part of the excitement for me. I love fighting good teams and honestly, if there was a MM in CW, it's possible that I would never get to fight them because they may be in a higher tier than I am. You are free to argue any of these points you like but saying that "there is 100% no reason it shouldn't" is demonstrably wrong.
#18
Posted 03 June 2017 - 08:39 AM
Monkey Lover, on 03 June 2017 - 07:53 AM, said:
People just say this so it makes it ok to farm lower skilled teams.
This mode needs a basic match maker and there is 100% no reason it shouldn't.
Can you explain how the matchmaker will function?
Because I don't see it changing much of anything. Let's say there are 9 top flight FW teams. Let's also say that 3 are NA time zone, 3 are EU, and 3 are oceanic. We'll call them tier 1 teams. These 9 teams will crush anyone outside of their tier 1 bracket. So It is NA prime time and the 3 NA teams are dropping. The match maker keeps pairing 2 of the 3 teams. Leaving the 3rd team to either wait in queue for 30 minutes(now you are back to stupid long wait times) for another top team to queue up or get paired with seals and club away.
A long time ago groups used to be limited to 4 or 12. 4 man groups could drop into the public QP queue with solos. 12 mans dropped into the 12 man queue. The 12 man queue was very sparsely populated(So much so that you could reliable sync drop for marik civil war etc.), You fought whoever was there. FW functions much the same way. You fight whoever is queued up.
The only way a matchmaker works is if you make the entire game mode solo only, which completely defeats the purpose of FW.
#19
Posted 03 June 2017 - 08:42 AM
Pat Kell, on 03 June 2017 - 08:37 AM, said:
It is ok to farm lower skilled teams if those teams sign up to play in a mode that was designed to not have a matchmaker and pit you against whoever shows up at your doorstep. What are we supposed to do, charge the enemy backwards? eject our first wave? (we have done that before btw and were praised by some for doing it and called elitist jerks by others). No, you drop in CW, you take the risk of playing against some very good, well coordinated teams.
There are lots of reasons for not putting a matchmaker in CW, you just chose to ignore all of those reasons. Too low of population, difficult to code (possibly, I have no idea really, just heard it said around a few times), lack of resources from PGI and pitting people against whoever you come up against is part of the excitement for me. I love fighting good teams and honestly, if there was a MM in CW, it's possible that I would never get to fight them because they may be in a higher tier than I am. You are free to argue any of these points you like but saying that "there is 100% no reason it shouldn't" is demonstrably wrong.
Great example of the mindset leading to Faction Play to the place where it is today. No more comment needed.
#20
Posted 03 June 2017 - 08:53 AM
PFC Carsten, on 03 June 2017 - 08:42 AM, said:
That's the second time you have said this and refused to give any back up statements. Neither myself nor any other person or unit is responsible for or led to the low population numbers we allegedly see in CW currently. People deciding to quit is what led to the low participation rate. Saying anything else is merely anecdotal or completely lacking of any evidence whatsoever. So you are correct, no more comment is needed because nothing you can say would be capable of proving that myself or any other player or unit is responsible for what is happening in CW. It would just be full of anecdotal evidence and gut feelings. Which are necessarily wrong by default, but certainly aren't capable of proving what you are asserting, which is that my mindset is what has caused our current situation.
4 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users