Jump to content

Please Consider Laser Duration Boosts For Targeting Computers


27 replies to this topic

#21 Shifty McSwift

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,889 posts

Posted 09 July 2017 - 02:54 PM

View PostAndi Nagasia, on 09 July 2017 - 09:53 AM, said:

I support this idea,


no trading Targeting Computers are already losing their Laser Range Bonus Next Patch Supposedly,

also assuming that TCs get the Same duration-reduction as Velocity Bonus,
that would mean (-35%C-Laser-Duration)(-38%IS-Laser-Duration)
remember this comes with a 7-8Ton & 7-8Crit Cost, its not Free,


Uhm so my cMPLs would have a burn time of about .5 seconds? CERLL would burn for about .75?

I mean I would love it but look at the results, they would likely have to increase burn rates just to compensate the potential.

#22 Ghogiel

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • CS 2021 Gold Champ
  • CS 2021 Gold Champ
  • 6,852 posts

Posted 09 July 2017 - 03:02 PM

View PostShifty McSwift, on 09 July 2017 - 02:54 PM, said:


Uhm so my cMPLs would have a burn time of about .5 seconds? CERLL would burn for about .75?

You'd still have to pay for that with a TC8 but 35% would still be pretty much OP territory imo

#23 Shifty McSwift

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,889 posts

Posted 09 July 2017 - 03:07 PM

View PostGhogiel, on 09 July 2017 - 03:02 PM, said:

You'd still have to pay for that with a TC8 but 35% would still be pretty much OP territory imo


Which I pretty happily would, and which every laser boat in his right mind definitely would.

It would work to increase the overall weight value of laser vomit by forcing people to use TC to get good burn times, which could be a good/great thing for the game in suppressing some of the stronger, lighter laser vomit boats from dominating that arena, so I am definitely not saying I hate the idea, just presenting the results at that rate, which would be huge.

Edited by Shifty McSwift, 09 July 2017 - 03:08 PM.


#24 Shifty McSwift

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,889 posts

Posted 09 July 2017 - 03:11 PM

Like, would everyone who supports the idea also not mind baser laser burn durations increasing by 15-20% to compensate?

Personally I wouldn't mind that massively, but I feel like it would make some people spit their chips.

#25 Ghogiel

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • CS 2021 Gold Champ
  • CS 2021 Gold Champ
  • 6,852 posts

Posted 09 July 2017 - 03:14 PM

View PostShifty McSwift, on 09 July 2017 - 03:07 PM, said:


Which I pretty happily would, and which every laser boat in his right mind definitely would.

It would work to increase the overall weight value of laser vomit by forcing people to use TC to get good burn times, which could be a good/great thing for the game in suppressing some of the stronger, lighter laser vomit boats from dominating that arena, so I am definitely not saying I hate the idea, just presenting the results at that rate, which would be huge.

It would probably be badly balanced especially when TCs are probably getting nerfed and thus removed from many builds as it stands. Anyway we've had 0.6sec lpl burn metas in the past so we can gage how it would probably work out base on that. **** was whack imo.

Edited by Ghogiel, 09 July 2017 - 03:15 PM.


#26 Y E O N N E

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Nimble
  • The Nimble
  • 16,810 posts

Posted 09 July 2017 - 03:16 PM

View PostGhogiel, on 09 July 2017 - 03:14 PM, said:

It would probably be badly balanced especially when TCs are probably getting nerfed and thus removed from many builds as it stands. Anyway we've had 0.6sec lpl burn metas in the past so we can gage how it would probably would work out base on that. **** was whack imo.


I mean, the isLPL burn is still only 0.67 seconds. I'm more concerned about 0.85 second ER LL burn metas. That's even more whack.

#27 VonBruinwald

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Undisputed
  • The Undisputed
  • 3,460 posts
  • LocationRandis IV

Posted 09 July 2017 - 03:35 PM

If we're gonna bump the TC for lasers can we fix it for LBX's first. Most forumites slate the LBX's as "inaccurate" and "poor for crits", applying the TC to LBX's will tackle this issue head-on (at the cost of tonnage).

HMN-PRIME don't hate, fear...

#28 ForceUser

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 894 posts

Posted 09 July 2017 - 03:47 PM

View PostAndi Nagasia, on 09 July 2017 - 09:53 AM, said:

I support this idea,


no trading Targeting Computers are already losing their Laser Range Bonus Next Patch Supposedly,

also assuming that TCs get the Same duration-reduction as Velocity Bonus,
that would mean (-35%C-Laser-Duration)(-38%IS-Laser-Duration)
remember this comes with a 7-8Ton & 7-8Crit Cost, its not Free,

I know what sounds like a good idea, less than .3sec duration LPLs.

Why only settle for hitscan, lets get some pinpoint alpha along with the hitscan.

Posted Image

(this is a very, very bad idea)

Edited by ForceUser, 09 July 2017 - 03:48 PM.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users