Countdown To Civil War Mech Release July 18Th
#81
Posted 12 July 2017 - 02:18 PM
YEEEAAAH!!!
#83
Posted 12 July 2017 - 02:37 PM
PGI STOP MAKING HUGE HUNKING HULKING PICES OF JUNK OUT OF MECHS THAT SHOULD BE SLENDER CURVED AND HARD TO HIT ON IS SIDE.
No...and i mean absolutely no official source of the Annihilator depicts the mech with huge hulking easy to hit components.
The mech is super slow and basicly a semi self powered turred emplacement and therefor equiped with curved armor and a slender hard to hit figure.
AND NOT ...NEVER....A BLOCKY EASY TO HIT SUPER TALL PILE OF JUNK.
The Clan Assault on the other hand has practicaly according to cannon bad easy to hit components and you made a flat hard to hit silhuette out of it....
THE F...WHYYYYY????
Why are you hating my money so much ?
Now I have to cancel my preorder.
Realy loocked forward to that ....well I guess time to do something else till the kinks and crancs of the new tech are settled and the we can see how badly you effed up the Night Star.
Edited by The Basilisk, 12 July 2017 - 02:43 PM.
#85
Posted 12 July 2017 - 02:42 PM
The Basilisk, on 12 July 2017 - 02:37 PM, said:
PGI STOP MAKING HUGE HUNKING HULKING PICES OF JUNK OUT OF MECHS THAT SHOULD BE SLENDER CURVED AND HARD TO HIT ON IS SIDE.
No...and i mean absolutely no official source of the Annihilator depicts the mech with huge hulking easy to hit components.
The mech is super slow and basicly a semi self powered turred emplacement and therefor equiped with curved armor and a slender hard to hit figure.
AND NOT ...NEVER....A BLOCKY EASY TO HIT SUPER TALL PILE OF JUNK.
I rest my case...
This is the best looking Annihilator we've ever gotten. (The above is the original BT design from Sarna, then MW4 Mercs, then MW3)
The annihilator is basically an area denial mech. It stands still, and keeps other mechs from being where it is. It's one of the tallest mechs period. Taller than an Atlas, taller than a Dire Wolf, the only thing I think is taller than it is an Executioner....
Edited by Twilight Fenrir, 12 July 2017 - 02:45 PM.
#86
Posted 12 July 2017 - 02:44 PM
Twilight Fenrir, on 12 July 2017 - 02:26 PM, said:
Sorry, not possible... the 2A has no energy slots in its head...
http://www.nooooooooooooooo.com/
#87
Posted 12 July 2017 - 02:50 PM
InnerSphereNews, on 11 July 2017 - 02:57 PM, said:
The Annihilator is repulsive.
I love it.
If the source art didn't exist, I would have assumed that Alex took some REALLY bad acid and designed a mech based on fear, well meaning intentions and visual impairment, with 8 hyper children yelling at him about what they thought a cool mech should look like.
Throat laser FTW.
#88
Posted 12 July 2017 - 02:59 PM
Kiiyor, on 12 July 2017 - 02:50 PM, said:
The Annihilator is repulsive.
I love it.
If the source art didn't exist, I would have assumed that Alex took some REALLY bad acid and designed a mech based on fear, well meaning intentions and visual impairment, with 8 hyper children yelling at him about what they thought a cool mech should look like.
Throat laser FTW.
I think the regular variants will look a bit better, without all those missile pods... but, it certainly looks intimidating...
#89
Posted 12 July 2017 - 03:02 PM
#90
Posted 12 July 2017 - 03:03 PM
The Basilisk, on 12 July 2017 - 02:37 PM, said:
PGI STOP MAKING HUGE HUNKING HULKING PICES OF JUNK OUT OF MECHS THAT SHOULD BE SLENDER CURVED AND HARD TO HIT ON IS SIDE.
No...and i mean absolutely no official source of the Annihilator depicts the mech with huge hulking easy to hit components.
The mech is super slow and basicly a semi self powered turred emplacement and therefor equiped with curved armor and a slender hard to hit figure.
AND NOT ...NEVER....A BLOCKY EASY TO HIT SUPER TALL PILE OF JUNK.
The Clan Assault on the other hand has practicaly according to cannon bad easy to hit components and you made a flat hard to hit silhuette out of it....
THE F...WHYYYYY????
Why are you hating my money so much ?
Now I have to cancel my preorder.
Realy loocked forward to that ....well I guess time to do something else till the kinks and crancs of the new tech are settled and the we can see how badly you effed up the Night Star.
I'm not sure what you're smoking, as every Annihlator in existence is similar to this one.
If you were looking for any lame excuse to cancel the order, you chose a really bad one about which to make a dramatic show in public.
How about you show me an Annihilator that doesn't at all look similar to the one Alex drew up?
#92
Posted 12 July 2017 - 03:12 PM
#93
Posted 12 July 2017 - 03:14 PM
LT. HARDCASE, on 12 July 2017 - 03:03 PM, said:
If you were looking for any lame excuse to cancel the order, you chose a really bad one about which to make a dramatic show in public.
How about you show me an Annihilator that doesn't at all look similar to the one Alex drew up?
Hey, better he cancel now than to get all his content and then ask for it to be removed from his account. Saves Customer Service some time on the follow-up emails where he yells about the Cbills that support took out of his account (since they'd have to redact the early adoptor rewards, too).
#95
Posted 12 July 2017 - 03:35 PM
Gas Guzzler, on 12 July 2017 - 03:09 PM, said:
Still no Jade Falcon designed assaults...
I would suggest the Jupiter or the Wakazashi. Those look pretty fun. Wouldn't mind seeing another 100 ton mech for the clan side since IS already has 3 (that would be including the Annihilator).
#96
Posted 12 July 2017 - 03:39 PM
corpse256, on 12 July 2017 - 03:35 PM, said:
I just think we should do the Turkina.
#97
Posted 12 July 2017 - 03:39 PM
Edited by draiocht, 13 July 2017 - 09:08 AM.
unconstructive, replies removed
#100
Posted 12 July 2017 - 03:48 PM
Matt Newman, on 12 July 2017 - 01:28 PM, said:
Sure I can do that for you. What flavor do you want them in? AlphaStrike? Mid-Run?
Staring off into the distance silently contemplating the new meta?
How about profile pics of the MKII standing in the open so we can see its stance and the size of its arms? No weapons firing because that blocks the visuals on the geometry. I am looking forward to the size comparisons on the Uziel also.
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users