Jump to content

What If? Um-R68 And Lurms...


22 replies to this topic

#21 WrathOfDeadguy

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Pest
  • The Pest
  • 1,951 posts

Posted 11 October 2017 - 08:08 PM

View Poststealthraccoon, on 11 October 2017 - 03:32 PM, said:

Well we could request that it only have 1 missile tube, that would drag out an LRM20 to an amusing duration...


The UM-R68 comes stock with an MRM30. If it doesn't have at least that many tubes on at least one of the two M hardpoints PGI is giving it, then they're doing it wrong.

#22 Fox With A Shotgun

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bridesmaid
  • 1,646 posts

Posted 11 October 2017 - 08:13 PM

View PostCatten Hart, on 11 October 2017 - 04:51 PM, said:

I feel the MRM-40 would be even more funny.


And if you would put the launcher on its crotch :D

#23 MadRover

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 568 posts

Posted 11 October 2017 - 09:05 PM

View PostMole, on 11 October 2017 - 03:59 PM, said:

I can't remember the exact build but I figured out a decent looking MRM build for it using all the math I could muster to theorycraft it. And don't tell me that MRMs suck. My Catapult has been a much better 'mech since I dropped its SRM6s for MRM30s.


Let me go ahead and say that MRMs suck. When a Cyclops can’t blow a mech out of the water because it’s using MRMs and not SRMs tells me everything I need to know about MRMs. Oh and this is a mech that only weighs 65tons and is standing still not bothering to twist because the MRMs spread alone does that part for me. It’s just atrociously bad. At least give it a decent enough spread or not let it fire in the silly stream pattern of cLRMs and fire in clusters of 5 or something.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users