202 replies to this topic

[Gas Guzzler]

Matt Newman, on 14 October 2017 - 02:43 PM, said:

Quirks are up! Also this...

I'll try and find out if it's the angle and the length on Monday.

Okay... recommend just making them more or less normal to the torso. I don't know if the length is an issue.

Jay Leon Hart, on 14 October 2017 - 02:50 PM, said:

That LT hardpoint placement is really irksome...

Spoiler

Spoiler

OMG....


Quirks aren't very exciting either. Nova Cat 8/8 quirks are better.

Edited by Gas Guzzler, 14 October 2017 - 03:02 PM.

[shameless]

those poor mechs, quirk starved for no real reason. so glad I didn't spend money on them.. I mean that poor osiris better pray its hitboxes are like the locust. if they're like the jenner, it's screwed... and the arcticwolf, I wanted it to be good, so so so much, but probably not...

[CK16]

Never chase the quriks -.-

[Gas Guzzler]

CK16, on 14 October 2017 - 03:15 PM, said:

Never chase the quriks -.-

That's easy for you to say. Mad Cat Mk. II is the best assault in the game with 0 quirks. Multiple Clan mechs have been the best of their class without quirks.

[Y E O N N E]

Matt Newman, on 14 October 2017 - 02:43 PM, said:

Quirks are up! Also this...

I'll try and find out if it's the angle and the length on Monday.

It wouldn't hurt anything to be both perpendicular to the torso and slightly shorter.

Also, those left torso hardpoints on the 9P and 9S should be in the same place relative to the right torso. Doesn't make sense to drop them like that.

Edited by Yeonne Greene, 14 October 2017 - 03:32 PM.

[Gas Guzzler]

Also interesting, then -9FC gets 10.79 kph/s accel like the Mauler/MAD-IIC/MCII, the rest get 9.65 kph/s accel.

[Y E O N N E]

Gas Guzzler, on 14 October 2017 - 03:34 PM, said:

Also interesting, then -9FC gets 10.79 kph/s accel like the Mauler/MAD-IIC/MCII, the rest get 9.65 kph/s accel.

You're right. They should all be 10.79 kph/s because they are going to need it a lot.

[Tordin]

Yeonne Greene, on 14 October 2017 - 03:31 PM, said:

It wouldn't hurt anything to be both perpendicular to the torso and slightly shorter.

Also, those left torso hardpoints on the 9P and 9S should be in the same place relative to the right torso. Doesn't make sense to drop them like that.

Sometimes I get this itchy feeling game developers despise anything left sided so to annoy and know they dont need to listen to those preferring lefty things in games models. Novas left arm and shoulder for example, and the mad dogs left missile tube model not mirrored? I will not believe PGI will be annoying and or cruel like that but still, its irksome to no end.

Nightstars should get both arms straight and up the left side torso mounts aswell. Then maybe get some rest to try to enjoy the mechs we paid for. Looks arent everything but its a deciding factor buying them for example, not only gameplay wise

[Y E O N N E]

Tordin, on 14 October 2017 - 03:42 PM, said:

Nightstars should get both arms straight and up the left side torso mounts aswell. Then maybe get some rest to try to enjoy the mechs we paid for. Looks arent everything but its a deciding factor buying them for example, not only gameplay wise

Yeah, I only play 'Mechs I find aesthetically pleasing. That's why I have a bazillion drops in Locusts, Blackjacks, Marauders, Riflemen, Jagers, Battlemasters, Shadow Cats, Mist Lynxes over my almost four years of playing despite them not always being the best. I own way more than just those, and some I thought I would enjoy I just haven't even played once because I find them repulsive to look at (e.g. HBJ-IIC, BSW, WHM)

[Jaspbo1]

Yeah, whilst the arms look better like this, aesthetically. It's not practical in game. I'm not one to kick and scream, but the concept art is a fair bit higher, good on PGI recognising this and fixing it. Other than that, the model is a knock out.

The others are dynamite. Makes a man wish he was rich, I was sceptical about how they'd translate in game, but the 3D art team have done a bang up job!

[Peter Overheater]

[Odanan]

Jay Leon Hart, on 14 October 2017 - 02:50 PM, said:

That LT hardpoint placement is really irksome...

Spoiler

Spoiler

Yeah, I would like some symmetry there...

[CK16]

I blame the Spheriod techs, they are so against symmetry O.o

[TheArisen]

Matt Newman, on 14 October 2017 - 02:43 PM, said:

Quirks are up! Also this...

I'll try and find out if it's the angle and the length on Monday.

Plz see if they will look into improving the weapon sym. and also shrink the side torsos. #plz

[TheArisen]

Peter Overheater, on 14 October 2017 - 04:56 PM, said:

I hope by some miracle those big vent things can be shrunk or just removed.

[WarmasterRaptor]

Honestly, I just want the arms fixed.

The rest I don’t care

[Gas Guzzler]

TheArisen, on 14 October 2017 - 06:19 PM, said:

I hope by some miracle those big vent things can be shrunk or just removed.

Lol... pretty sure those are here to stay. We kinda knew this was coming with the side torsos...

Would be shocked if they fixed that LT hardpoint.

[Mark Nicholson]

Tordin, on 14 October 2017 - 03:42 PM, said:

Sometimes I get this itchy feeling game developers despise anything left sided so to annoy and know they dont need to listen to those preferring lefty things in games models.

Except several mech modellers are lefties. This lefty in particular is advocating for you, because I like my nice left side when I play.

[StealthdragonB]

Am I the only one here who likes the asymmetrical look

[Y E O N N E]

StealthdragonB, on 14 October 2017 - 10:14 PM, said:

Am I the only one here who likes the asymmetrical look

If this were just about looks, there wouldn't be anywhere near as much pushback on it.