Jump to content

Does Pgi Even Know Clans Dont Have Rotary Autocannons? If So Wtf Is Up With Cua5 Heat Increase?


2 replies to this topic

#1 l33tworks

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,296 posts
  • LocationSydney, Australia

Posted 17 October 2017 - 06:58 PM

"[color=#3073F3]have also decided to slightly raise the Heat on the UAC/5 weapons to keep standard and rotary AutoCannons more focused toward sustained DPS, "[/color]


Err What? Ok thats fine for IS. But clans DONT have them! So how can they use this as a justufucation for clans?

P.S nobodody sane uses regular clan ACs so they are a non factor.If they were single shell weapons yes..But as they are no.

So please leave cuac5 heat at 1.5. Dakka is already wayy to hot compared to lasers we dont need more overheating for clan dakka.

Edited by l33tworks, 17 October 2017 - 07:01 PM.


#2 Y E O N N E

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Nimble
  • The Nimble
  • 16,810 posts

Posted 17 October 2017 - 07:05 PM

Lol, as if rotaries and IS UACs weren't also ridiculously hot. Hotter even than the cUACs, since there usually aren't as many extra heatsinks involved.

The heat nerf was silly across the board. They should have just left UAC velocity lower.

#3 El Bandito

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Big Daddy
  • Big Daddy
  • 26,736 posts
  • LocationStill doing ungodly amount of damage, but with more accuracy.

Posted 17 October 2017 - 07:07 PM

Clans do have UACs. So there.

View Postl33tworks, on 17 October 2017 - 06:58 PM, said:

So please leave cuac5 heat at 1.5. Dakka is already wayy to hot compared to lasers we dont need more overheating for clan dakka.


As much as I think that dakka heat should go down (1.66 heat UAC5 is just dumb), dakka is not way too hot compared to lasers. Their DPH stats clearly reflect that. What's giving the lasers their edge is the peekaboo meta.

Edited by El Bandito, 17 October 2017 - 07:12 PM.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users