Jun Watarase, on 21 November 2017 - 04:29 PM, said:
MAD-IIC
SNV-C
HBR
EBJ
The HBR/EBJ can do 4x ER LLs with a decent amount of DHS in high torso mounts. SNV-C can do 4 with a large tcomp and tons of DHS in high torso mounts. The MAD-IIC has three high torso mounts and two in the CT, although i cannot remember how high the CT mounts are, but the MAD-IIC has awful agility which is bad for trading, which is why the SNV-C is preferred these days.
You can do 5x ER LLs with 32 DHS on the SNV-C, but that obviously requires using the low slung weapon arms, which nobody wants to do since it means you get focused fired into oblivion while trying to get the arms clear of a hill to fire (and which is why most people dont use warhawks anymore since they cant ridge hump effectively). And most people would probably prefer 4x ER LLs with a tcomp 7 for the zoom/range bonuses anyway.
Its just sad that ER LLs are basically the go to weapon for long range since its basically the i-win button. Gauss cant match the range, ER PPCs are too hot and aren't hitscan, UAC 2s are a DPS weapon which doesnt work for long range. LRMs need no explanation for why they dont work.
There is basically no other viable choice available which is why long ranged maps in FP usually degenerate into ER LL poke fests at extreme ranges when its two decent teams facing off.
I use the SNV-1 with 6 cER LL. It works great.
Also, ER PPCs and UAC2s are great extreme range weapons. UAC2s won't be as popular in FP due to ammo dependence, but saying that ERLLs are the only extreme range weapons is false. UAC2s can out trade ER LL in certain cases... Did you miss that when somebody mentioned that already?