16 replies to this topic

[El Bandito]

If not, I'll be picking the one that sells for the most amount of C-Bills.

[Daggett]

They don't have the (L) appendix or anything else that would hint to a cbill-bonus, so i don't expect them to have it.

Edited by Daggett, 22 December 2017 - 03:56 AM.

[Zh0u]

Nope, its just normal mechs.

[Juodas Varnas]

Eh, i'll probably do the same and take the most expensive one to sell.
Even though, i've no real need or want for more Cbills, got almost 900mil at the moment.

Edited by Juodas Varnas, 22 December 2017 - 04:50 AM.

[The Lobsters]

The Summoner-M will give the best resale value. Or go for the Cataphract if you really want an XL280.

[Bombast]

Confirming the Summoner-M is the one you want for selling. 14 million.

[The Lobsters]

Bombast, on 22 December 2017 - 07:01 AM, said:

Confirming the Summoner-M is the one you want for selling. 14 million.

I've gone full blown Bushwacker with the mech sale, so that xl 280 is compelling.

[Bombast]

The Lobsters, on 22 December 2017 - 07:04 AM, said:

I've gone full blown Bushwacker with the mech sale, so that xl 280 is compelling.

Can't say I've ever put a 280XL in a Bushwacker.

[Armored Yokai]

I wish we got hero mechs instead...

[Juodas Varnas]

Armored Yokai, on 22 December 2017 - 07:27 AM, said:

I wish we got hero mechs instead...

I wish we got Quad mechs instead.

Sadly, we can't always get what we wish..

[panzer1b]

Im actually quite happy they are normal mechs, i currently have enuff mechbays and thus i could care less about the lootbag event (if anythging the bags themselves are best since they MAY contain MC if the stars allign and PGI's RNG software doesnt hate me). I just treat it like anything else, nice if i happen to play enough to get it, but defenetely not worth playing when im not actually in the mood to play MWO just to obtain...

[LT. HARDCASE]

The Lobsters, on 22 December 2017 - 07:04 AM, said:

I've gone full blown Bushwacker with the mech sale, so that xl 280 is compelling.

The Bushwackers all come with XL275s. There's literally no benefit in undertaking such a huge grind to gain a single XL280.

[The Lighthouse]

I mean, you don't put XL on bushwacker in the first place unless if you really, really want to carry big ballistic, like triple AC5 or dual UAC10.

...though, for the unique to the Bushwacker, you'd rather want to keep light engine and put dual RAC5 instead. Bushwacker is probably only mech that RAC works really well.

[Blue Vermin]

The Lighthouse, on 22 December 2017 - 04:12 PM, said:

I mean, you don't put XL on bushwacker in the first place unless if you really, really want to carry big ballistic, like triple AC5 or dual UAC10.

...

The BSW is one of the few IS mechs that can carry an xl engine in relative safety. It's tanky and good at spreading damage.

[Jingseng]

Blue Vermin, on 22 December 2017 - 06:13 PM, said:

The BSW is one of the few IS mechs that can carry an xl engine in relative safety. It's tanky and good at spreading damage.

and ideally you are shooting the legs and not the torso anyway

[Exard3k]

Good hint with that XL 280. Can't ever get enough of that rating...

[Revis Volek]

Blue Vermin, on 22 December 2017 - 06:13 PM, said:

The BSW is one of the few IS mechs that can carry an xl engine in relative safety. It's tanky and good at spreading damage.

Always depended on what you wanted to do with it, Brawl mechs should never have XL's or ammo in the legs. Range mechs on the other hand can get away with things like that.

Edited by Revis Volek, 23 December 2017 - 09:32 AM.