Jump to content

Which Warhawk Variant?


32 replies to this topic

#1 Mad Dog Morgan

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Raider
  • The Raider
  • 489 posts
  • LocationOutlaw On The Run, Faster than a Stolen Gun

Posted 05 March 2018 - 04:15 PM

Hey, saw that the Warhawks dipped in price. Are they still worth picking up? If so, which variant?

#2 Exard3k

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The God of Death
  • The God of Death
  • 1,010 posts
  • LocationEast Frisia in Germany

Posted 05 March 2018 - 04:42 PM

Prime or -C, Hero is great as well.

#3 FearNotDeath

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Big Daddy
  • Big Daddy
  • 305 posts
  • LocationNew York

Posted 06 March 2018 - 03:16 PM

F, oh wait...

#4 sardakarx

    Rookie

  • The Jaws
  • The Jaws
  • 6 posts

Posted 06 March 2018 - 03:21 PM

B variant can be a blast too with kind of a splat variant and pulse lasers

#5 Brethren

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 94 posts

Posted 08 March 2018 - 01:37 AM

I'd go for-Prime. It's still one of the best PPC carriers out there, primarily due to quirks on omnipods as well as the set-of-8 and the shipload of heat sinks every WHK comes with.
Big plus: You do not need to spend a lot of cbills on equipment. Simply drop the missiles, maybe pick a different TC and add heat sinks. Finished!


-B and -C net you additional hardpoints but their builds do not stand out among other assaults as much as the -Prime does.

Edited by Brethren, 08 March 2018 - 01:42 AM.


#6 Audacious Aubergine

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Death Wish
  • The Death Wish
  • 1,030 posts

Posted 08 March 2018 - 03:24 AM

Most people will tell you that anything the Warhawk does, the Marauder IIC will do better. Personally, I have a soft spot for the Warhawk and seem to do better overall in it than in the Marauder (possibly because I might not get focused as hard, who knows)
In no particular order, the Prime is still a good PPC mech. I favour the -C - I run it with 2x ER PPC, 2x LPL and an ERSL as a heat neutral backup poker. If you can spare the cash, the hero can also be pretty brutal. I run mine with 3x HML, 2x UAC10 and an LRM15 for the first few minutes to annoy people.

#7 DerHuhnTeufel

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 195 posts

Posted 09 March 2018 - 07:22 AM

I picked up the C on sale and fitted 2 ER PPCs and 3 MPL. First match I did almost 1100 damage. Thinking it could use some torso speed but it's a very solid mech.

#8 justcallme A S H

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • CS 2020 Referee
  • CS 2020 Referee
  • 8,987 posts
  • LocationMelbourne, AU

Posted 09 March 2018 - 02:01 PM

View PostAudacious Aubergine, on 08 March 2018 - 03:24 AM, said:

Most people will tell you that anything the Warhawk does, the Marauder IIC will do better.


Who says that?

WHK is far better @ cERPPC and cERL boating and has higher mounts.

#9 Koniving

    Welcoming Committee

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Guide
  • The Guide
  • 23,384 posts

Posted 09 March 2018 - 02:26 PM

I'm flabbergasted.
All the Marauder IIC being superior hubjub (which some is true, some not so much) is usually from many of those meta-mechs worshiping enthusiasts (and numerous other youtubers.)

But yes, there are a number of things that each does fairly well. For example, the Warhawk is not great (actually its absolutely terrible) for ballistic-based builds (though it appears that if you have the right arm from the Hero, a decent ballistic build might be possible).
It does energy builds very well and it does pretty good at builds with missile launchers, too. The Warhawk B, due to its additional CT missile launcher, is the best for missile-based builds that rely on multiple launchers.
The Prime would be your goto for cERPPCs for obvious reasons (Quiiiiirks!)

Until last year, the Warhawks Prime and B were among my biggest money makers. I haven't used them since the new skill tree, however, as they're among 280+ mechs that I gotta go through, do the skill tree for, etc.. and that very quickly becomes a chore even if you're given all the historical skill points needed to unlock 91 nodes immediately as there's still the 'game' of clicking everything...

Edited by Koniving, 09 March 2018 - 02:27 PM.


#10 DarkFhoenix

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Terror
  • The Terror
  • 401 posts

Posted 09 March 2018 - 02:45 PM

I picked up a Warhawk B and it seems to be doing a better job than my Prime at kicking butt

#11 justcallme A S H

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • CS 2020 Referee
  • CS 2020 Referee
  • 8,987 posts
  • LocationMelbourne, AU

Posted 09 March 2018 - 03:13 PM

They only difference with the B is the missile CT... Which is only good for SRM or, dare I say it, LRMs.

The other variants and set-of-8 quirks are far more useful/attractive.

#12 Audacious Aubergine

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Death Wish
  • The Death Wish
  • 1,030 posts

Posted 09 March 2018 - 04:30 PM

View Postjustcallme A S H, on 09 March 2018 - 02:01 PM, said:


Who says that?

WHK is far better @ cERPPC and cERL boating and has higher mounts.

Not me. Personally I still prefer the Warhawk

#13 Spare Parts Bin

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Wild Dog
  • Wild Dog
  • 1,743 posts
  • LocationSearching alternate universes via temporal wormhole generator.

Posted 11 March 2018 - 03:54 AM

I picked up the C. I use 1 UAC-5 in the Rt. Arm, 2 SRM-6 in the Rt. Torso,an ERLL in the CT, twin Heavy ML in the Lft. Arm and either a third SRM-6 or an ATM6 or 9 or LRM-15. This is a good build for me.

Edited by Spare Parts Bin, 11 March 2018 - 12:47 PM.


#14 Damnedtroll

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 676 posts
  • LocationFrog land of Quebec

Posted 11 March 2018 - 05:36 AM

Using the C with 4 lpulses cutting things up. Warhawk is just not the mech to tank damage, you need to clearly engage the enemy with others teammate. Marauder can forgive you more on a rambo heresy than the Warhawk.

#15 The Basilisk

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Mercenary
  • The Mercenary
  • 3,270 posts
  • LocationFrankfurt a.M.

Posted 11 March 2018 - 06:02 AM

View PostMad Dog Morgan, on 05 March 2018 - 04:15 PM, said:

Hey, saw that the Warhawks dipped in price. Are they still worth picking up? If so, which variant?


Most Things have been mentioned already:
- Averange speed,
- bad/averange hitboxes,
- most weapons in his arms when you go for energy boat
- good at energy boating,
- good at missile boating,
- reactor not changable due to omnimech
- lots of fixed equipment
- dead left torso/ no hardpoints

To me it is a fun but overexpensive, averange assault mech that can do a very narrow band of things on specific ocassions quite good but will perform averange or fail spectacularely in a much larger number of cases.
Reason why ppl prefere the MADIIC is the potential to optimize it more and customize other things than hardpoints and loadout as well as having a wider range of ballistic and energy options.
Also the Hitboxes of MAD IIC are much better than those of Warhawk.

Edited by The Basilisk, 11 March 2018 - 06:04 AM.


#16 Zergling

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Angel
  • The Angel
  • 2,439 posts

Posted 12 March 2018 - 11:41 PM

View PostSpare Parts Bin, on 11 March 2018 - 03:54 AM, said:

I picked up the C. I use 1 UAC-5 in the Rt. Arm, 2 SRM-6 in the Rt. Torso,an ERLL in the CT, twin Heavy ML in the Lft. Arm and either a third SRM-6 or an ATM6 or 9 or LRM-15. This is a good build for me.


No offence meant, but that build makes no sense at all to me.

#17 Spare Parts Bin

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Wild Dog
  • Wild Dog
  • 1,743 posts
  • LocationSearching alternate universes via temporal wormhole generator.

Posted 13 March 2018 - 02:39 PM

View PostZergling, on 12 March 2018 - 11:41 PM, said:


No offence meant, but that build makes no sense at all to me.


The ERLL allows you to poke or harass as you advance as would an LRM-15. However I usually end up with 3 SRM-6, 2 Heavy MLs,and a UAC-5. The Heavy MLs and the SRMs have about the same range. The UAC-5 and ERLL allow me to reach out and pound someone.

#18 sardakarx

    Rookie

  • The Jaws
  • The Jaws
  • 6 posts

Posted 13 March 2018 - 02:40 PM

https://mwo.smurfy-n...dd2f3d5880ba3a8

Super fun WHK-B build

*very cool too

Edited by sardakarx, 13 March 2018 - 02:41 PM.


#19 Spare Parts Bin

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Wild Dog
  • Wild Dog
  • 1,743 posts
  • LocationSearching alternate universes via temporal wormhole generator.

Posted 13 March 2018 - 02:53 PM

View Postsardakarx, on 13 March 2018 - 02:40 PM, said:

https://mwo.smurfy-n...dd2f3d5880ba3a8

Super fun WHK-B build

*very cool too


I like the weapons but it doesn't have a stitch of armour.

#20 sardakarx

    Rookie

  • The Jaws
  • The Jaws
  • 6 posts

Posted 13 March 2018 - 03:13 PM

View PostSpare Parts Bin, on 13 March 2018 - 02:53 PM, said:

I like the weapons but it doesn't have a stitch of armour.

figured people would be smart enough to do what they would armor wise... clearly you proved me wrong





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users