Jump to content

Oceanic Server Connection Discussion - Perth Edition


116 replies to this topic

#101 CUTE PUPPY LUV

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • Giant Helper
  • Giant Helper
  • 54 posts

Posted 01 April 2019 - 02:06 AM

Oceanic still looks very red from the rest of the world. And maybe not many people is aware of the improvement yet.

#102 arcana75

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Shredder
  • Shredder
  • 1,161 posts

Posted 01 April 2019 - 04:23 AM

View PostCUTE PUPPY LUV, on 01 April 2019 - 02:06 AM, said:

Oceanic still looks very red from the rest of the world. And maybe not many people is aware of the improvement yet.

Well alot of EU/NA players on principle don't enable Oceanic. I see it on all the NA/EU streamers. NA streamers in particular enable only NA.

#103 arcana75

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Shredder
  • Shredder
  • 1,161 posts

Posted 24 May 2019 - 07:34 PM

There are problems with the Oceanic server... alot of us are being kicked from the gameserver and dumped back to the mechbay and have our mechs locked but no way to return to the match (says "mech is locked and cannot be taken into a game"). Mechbay says it's ingame but there's NO GAME to rejoin.

#104 jjm1

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Hell Fork
  • Hell Fork
  • 1,350 posts

Posted 31 May 2019 - 09:29 PM

Perth to Perth traffic is going through Sydney.

A lot of pings across the board on Oceanic also seem to be a lot higher than usual.

Someone might want to check up on how its being configured.


|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| WinMTR statistics |
| Host - % | Sent | Recv | Best | Avrg | Wrst | Last |
|------------------------------------------------|------|------|------|------|------|------|
| x - 0 | 34 | 34 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 |
| x - 0 | 34 | 34 | 6 | 7 | 26 | 7 |
| No response from host - 100 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 180.150.0.147 - 0 | 34 | 34 | 5 | 6 | 26 | 6 |
| be10-3999.core1.vdc01.per.aussiebb.net - 0 | 34 | 34 | 6 | 7 | 27 | 7 |
|HundredGigE0-0-0-16.core1.ia-dcb.portmel.aussiebb.net - 0 | 34 | 34 | 53 | 54 | 74 | 53 |
| be2.core1.vdc03.mel.aussiebb.net - 0 | 34 | 34 | 53 | 54 | 73 | 53 |
|HundredGigE0-0-0-16.core1.vdc01.syd.aussiebb.net - 0 | 34 | 34 | 53 | 54 | 73 | 54 |
| 218.100.53.28 - 0 | 34 | 34 | 53 | 54 | 75 | 53 |
| 198.32.212.137 - 0 | 34 | 34 | 53 | 53 | 73 | 53 |
| 172.31.255.14 - 0 | 34 | 34 | 53 | 53 | 74 | 53 |
| 45.121.208.130 - 0 | 34 | 34 | 53 | 53 | 74 | 54 |
|________________________________________________|______|______|______|______|______|______|

#105 Mont

    Rookie

  • The Tip of the Spear
  • The Tip of the Spear
  • 8 posts

Posted 01 June 2019 - 01:05 AM

View Postjjm1, on 31 May 2019 - 09:29 PM, said:

Perth to Perth traffic is going through Sydney.

Does your ISP have a PoP in Perth?
Mine goes through Melbourne and back because my ISP doesn't have a PoP in Perth.

#106 jjm1

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Hell Fork
  • Hell Fork
  • 1,350 posts

Posted 01 June 2019 - 01:34 AM

View PostMont, on 01 June 2019 - 01:05 AM, said:

Does your ISP have a PoP in Perth?
Mine goes through Melbourne and back because my ISP doesn't have a PoP in Perth.


Yeah I used to get under 10ms. Something has changed.

#107 Cold Soul

    Member

  • PipPip
  • The Solitary
  • The Solitary
  • 26 posts
  • Google+: Link
  • LocationAustralia [East coast]

Posted 14 July 2019 - 05:18 AM

Guys loving the Perth server, its a dream come truePosted Image

#108 Haven17

    Rookie

  • Bad Company
  • 1 posts

Posted 14 August 2019 - 08:33 AM

came back after a year... with a kickass machine... to find 300+ ping for Oceania from Singapore.... same for NA & EU
yes I came to read... so now... hmnnn… mixed feelings... should I sleep on it for another year?

#109 jjm1

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Hell Fork
  • Hell Fork
  • 1,350 posts

Posted 14 August 2019 - 10:16 PM

View PostHaven17, on 14 August 2019 - 08:33 AM, said:

came back after a year... with a kickass machine... to find 300+ ping for Oceania from Singapore.... same for NA & EU
yes I came to read... so now... hmnnn… mixed feelings... should I sleep on it for another year?


I can ping 60ms to Singapore from Perth. Check with your service provider.

#110 arcana75

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Shredder
  • Shredder
  • 1,161 posts

Posted 15 August 2019 - 03:55 AM

View Postjjm1, on 14 August 2019 - 10:16 PM, said:


I can ping 60ms to Singapore from Perth. Check with your service provider.

What are you pinging? Is it a resi IP or some random server in a Singapore data-centre?

View PostHaven17, on 14 August 2019 - 08:33 AM, said:

came back after a year... with a kickass machine... to find 300+ ping for Oceania from Singapore.... same for NA & EU
yes I came to read... so now... hmnnn… mixed feelings... should I sleep on it for another year?

Haven17 which ISP are you on? I'm not surprised by your Oceanic ping, but for NA you shouldn't be getting 300+.

Edited by arcana75, 15 August 2019 - 03:55 AM.


#111 jjm1

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Hell Fork
  • Hell Fork
  • 1,350 posts

Posted 15 August 2019 - 06:39 AM

View Postarcana75, on 15 August 2019 - 03:55 AM, said:

What are you pinging? Is it a resi IP or some random server in a Singapore data-centre?


AWS. But that eliminates the cables being down.

#112 arcana75

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Shredder
  • Shredder
  • 1,161 posts

Posted 15 August 2019 - 10:43 PM

View Postjjm1, on 15 August 2019 - 06:39 AM, said:


AWS. But that eliminates the cables being down.

Pinging AWS in SG is kinda meaningless from a player perspective. You can ping/traceroute all the major CDN servers in SG and get great pings from elsewhere in the region, but it doesn't reflect at all the situation with residentials.

#113 Jun Watarase

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 3,471 posts

Posted 04 September 2019 - 10:39 AM

Pinging from Singapore here, the ping to the oceanic server in perth is higher than the NA one. 300 ms to oceanic, 230 to NA. That cant be right.

Tracing route to 45.121.208.130 over a maximum of 30 hops

1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms LINKSYS02408 [192.168.1.1]
2 5 ms 6 ms 4 ms 182.55.231.2
3 4 ms 4 ms 5 ms 182.19.151.18
4 4 ms 4 ms 3 ms 183.90.44.229
5 4 ms 4 ms 3 ms 203.117.36.53
6 4 ms 7 ms 4 ms 203.117.36.42
7 4 ms 3 ms 3 ms snge-b2-link.telia.net [62.115.147.112]
8 6 ms 4 ms 4 ms snge-b1-link.telia.net [62.115.135.204]
9 166 ms 166 ms 166 ms sjo-b21-link.telia.net [62.115.114.40]
10 167 ms 168 ms 168 ms palo-b22-link.telia.net [62.115.115.216]
11 168 ms 168 ms 167 ms cogent-ic-344188-palo-b22.c.telia.net [62.115.174.65]
12 172 ms 172 ms 172 ms be2016.ccr22.sfo01.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.0.177]
13 187 ms 186 ms 186 ms be3694.ccr21.pdx01.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.84.30]
14 320 ms 320 ms 320 ms be3703.ccr51.syd01.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.87.125]
15 250 ms 250 ms 250 ms te1.bdr1.syd4.gslnetworks.com.au [103.137.13.130]
16 207 ms 207 ms 207 ms 103.52.119.9
17 * * * Request timed out.
18 297 ms 297 ms 297 ms 45.121.208.130

Any ideas on what can be done about this? How do you find out where the problematic hop is? I mean, it just says requet timed out with no info.

MWO tech support basically just said they cant do anything about bad hops or routing issues.

#114 arcana75

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Shredder
  • Shredder
  • 1,161 posts

Posted 10 September 2019 - 01:33 AM

View PostJun Watarase, on 04 September 2019 - 10:39 AM, said:

Pinging from Singapore here, the ping to the oceanic server in perth is higher than the NA one. 300 ms to oceanic, 230 to NA. That cant be right.

Tracing route to 45.121.208.130 over a maximum of 30 hops

1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms LINKSYS02408 [192.168.1.1]
2 5 ms 6 ms 4 ms 182.55.231.2
3 4 ms 4 ms 5 ms 182.19.151.18
4 4 ms 4 ms 3 ms 183.90.44.229
5 4 ms 4 ms 3 ms 203.117.36.53
6 4 ms 7 ms 4 ms 203.117.36.42
7 4 ms 3 ms 3 ms snge-b2-link.telia.net [62.115.147.112]
8 6 ms 4 ms 4 ms snge-b1-link.telia.net [62.115.135.204]
9 166 ms 166 ms 166 ms sjo-b21-link.telia.net [62.115.114.40]
10 167 ms 168 ms 168 ms palo-b22-link.telia.net [62.115.115.216]
11 168 ms 168 ms 167 ms cogent-ic-344188-palo-b22.c.telia.net [62.115.174.65]
12 172 ms 172 ms 172 ms be2016.ccr22.sfo01.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.0.177]
13 187 ms 186 ms 186 ms be3694.ccr21.pdx01.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.84.30]
14 320 ms 320 ms 320 ms be3703.ccr51.syd01.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.87.125]
15 250 ms 250 ms 250 ms te1.bdr1.syd4.gslnetworks.com.au [103.137.13.130]
16 207 ms 207 ms 207 ms 103.52.119.9
17 * * * Request timed out.
18 297 ms 297 ms 297 ms 45.121.208.130

Any ideas on what can be done about this? How do you find out where the problematic hop is? I mean, it just says requet timed out with no info.

MWO tech support basically just said they cant do anything about bad hops or routing issues.

You went from Singapore to USA (San Jose, Palo Alto, San Fran, Portland) then to Sydney, then to Perth where the Oceanic Server is. Half-way around the world. Is it Starhub Fibre?

Edited by arcana75, 10 September 2019 - 01:38 AM.


#115 MOBAjobg

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The People's Hero
  • 303 posts

Posted 19 November 2019 - 03:31 PM

Ping was in excess of 350ms in the past and has made a remarkable improvement to 80ms recently.

#116 Jackal Noble

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Bludgeon
  • The Bludgeon
  • 4,858 posts
  • LocationTerra

Posted 26 February 2020 - 02:09 PM

View PostMOBAjobg, on 19 November 2019 - 03:31 PM, said:

Ping was in excess of 350ms in the past and has made a remarkable improvement to 80ms recently.

That made for some amazing oceanic invincible hitboxes

#117 OZHomerOZ

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • 3,022 posts

Posted 26 June 2020 - 04:49 AM

Thats normal on NA when your high pinged
NA invincible hotboxes from where I stand
Alpha and the paper doll dont even change colour even after the 3rd hit at times. Minimally viable product same ole

Edited by OZHomerOZ, 26 June 2020 - 04:49 AM.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users