Jump to content

Press F For Clans


68 replies to this topic

#61 Y E O N N E

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Nimble
  • The Nimble
  • 16,810 posts

Posted 12 May 2018 - 06:39 AM

View PostBTGbullseye, on 12 May 2018 - 05:23 AM, said:

All of which were balanced for combat by the significantly increased armor of the IS mechs, significantly higher heat generation by Clan weapons, and reduced variety of both weapons selection and mech selection.


I take some slight issue with this statement. Weapons were not balanced for the increased armor on IS 'Mechs, IS 'Mechs were balanced for the increased damage on Clan weapons. It's a distinction that matters because the Clan weapons have historically always been very high damage while IS 'Mechs used to be just as squishy as Clan 'Mechs.

#62 oldradagast

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Philanthropist
  • 4,833 posts

Posted 12 May 2018 - 08:10 AM

View PostEnsaine, on 12 May 2018 - 04:56 AM, said:


And here we are again, not knowing what's going on, but wanting to sound like you do.....


Exactly. I find it amusing that the people defending this idiotic change with "use weapon groups and stagger your fire" are the SAME types of people who bash noobs all the time for playing with weapons that take forever to deal their damage!

Turning Clan lasers into "laser RACS" that require long burn time to cycle through weapon groups doesn't make them "skill" - it makes them not viable, just like RAC's and MRM's in most cases.

#63 Bulletsponge0

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Vicious
  • The Vicious
  • 2,947 posts

Posted 12 May 2018 - 08:35 AM

good news is....


micro class lasers still have ghost heat too!!!!

#64 Revis Volek

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The 1 Percent
  • The 1 Percent
  • 7,247 posts
  • Google+: Link
  • Facebook: Link
  • LocationBack in the Pilots chair

Posted 12 May 2018 - 09:18 AM

F for all Laser Omnipods or over half the clan mech lineup.

#65 BTGbullseye

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Solitary
  • The Solitary
  • 1,540 posts
  • LocationI'm still pissed about ATMs having a minimum range.

Posted 12 May 2018 - 10:24 PM

View PostYeonne Greene, on 12 May 2018 - 06:39 AM, said:


I take some slight issue with this statement. Weapons were not balanced for the increased armor on IS 'Mechs, IS 'Mechs were balanced for the increased damage on Clan weapons. It's a distinction that matters because the Clan weapons have historically always been very high damage while IS 'Mechs used to be just as squishy as Clan 'Mechs.

You have a reading comprehension fail.

The "by" is where you should've broken the sentence structure, not the "for". It is because of the current IS state that there is balance, and irregardless of what happened to cause it, nerfing UNbalances it.

#66 Y E O N N E

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Nimble
  • The Nimble
  • 16,810 posts

Posted 12 May 2018 - 10:32 PM

View PostBTGbullseye, on 12 May 2018 - 10:24 PM, said:

You have a reading comprehension fail.

The "by" is where you should've broken the sentence structure, not the "for". It is because of the current IS state that there is balance, and irregardless of what happened to cause it, nerfing UNbalances it.


So I have a reading comprehension fail because you constructed your sentence backwards?

Neato.

#67 Variant1

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,148 posts

Posted 13 May 2018 - 05:55 AM

good riddance i say, time to crack down on all lazer vomit! long live dakka!
they shoulda nerfed clans harder imo

#68 Mortalcoil

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The God
  • The God
  • 299 posts

Posted 13 May 2018 - 08:44 PM

lol, this post aged poorly. Now it's just a snapshot of the power of crying.

#69 A Really Old Clan Dude

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Jaws
  • The Jaws
  • 302 posts

Posted 13 May 2018 - 09:06 PM

Poor nova prime.

no more 6 shooters on each side.





38 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 38 guests, 0 anonymous users