So They Want To Change/balance Lasers?
#1
Posted 13 May 2018 - 05:03 PM
So here is my simple idea...
I say limit it to 6 total lasers total between Med's & Larges for both sides (maybe IS can get 7). With this make it so you cannot also add any Gauss Rifles, AC5/10/20's, LBX5/10/20's, UAC 5/10/20's, SRM 4/6's, LRM10/15/20's , MRM's, ATM's, & PPC's to the laser alpha (really most players do not anyway case is tracking with lasers and leading target). The current rules still apply though of Ghost Heat to the large and med class by themselves for each side.
Just a thought?
#2
Posted 13 May 2018 - 05:24 PM
PS: I only play clan mechs now
#3
Posted 13 May 2018 - 05:38 PM
#4
Posted 13 May 2018 - 06:04 PM
- IS ML/MPL up to 7 without GH.
- Light PPCs up to 4 without GH (20 damage, on par with 2 regular PPCs while being 2 total tons less with slightly more heat).
- Lower GH buildup when using a combination of RACs that breaks current GH ruleset (Example: Two RAC2s and one RAC5).
- Allow up to 3 Light Gauss rifles to be charged at a time instead of just 2. (24 damage in comparison to two regular gauss rifles at 30 damage, maybe nerf cooldown to 3.10s to balance out the charge limit)
- Missiles are in an okay place (Note to Forum LRMers: in an OKAY place, not saying it's perfect and doesn't need minor tweaks, just not a priority in terms of overall balance). As much as i would like MRM70 without GH, i feel like that might be a little too much. Although, GH can go when you try to stick a 40 with a 10 or 20.
#5
Posted 13 May 2018 - 06:05 PM
LordBraxton, on 13 May 2018 - 05:24 PM, said:
PS: I only play clan mechs now
... That breaks far more than it helps. You do realise that IS can boat heatsinks and lasers just fine, too? Return of the Swayback, anyone?
#6
Posted 13 May 2018 - 08:06 PM
N0ni, on 13 May 2018 - 06:04 PM, said:
- IS ML/MPL up to 7 without GH.
- Light PPCs up to 4 without GH (20 damage, on par with 2 regular PPCs while being 2 total tons less with slightly more heat).
- Lower GH buildup when using a combination of RACs that breaks current GH ruleset (Example: Two RAC2s and one RAC5).
- Allow up to 3 Light Gauss rifles to be charged at a time instead of just 2. (24 damage in comparison to two regular gauss rifles at 30 damage, maybe nerf cooldown to 3.10s to balance out the charge limit)
- Missiles are in an okay place (Note to Forum LRMers: in an OKAY place, not saying it's perfect and doesn't need minor tweaks, just not a priority in terms of overall balance). As much as i would like MRM70 without GH, i feel like that might be a little too much. Although, GH can go when you try to stick a 40 with a 10 or 20.
I feel like trying to balance LGauss around 3 is a bad idea because more chassis can mount two than can mount three, and I'd rather tune the weapon for the majority.
And while we're at it: SN-PPC to 3x, pls...it's just not enough punch for the range at only two. Not worried about combos with ballistics because that's hot as balls.
#7
Posted 13 May 2018 - 08:24 PM
LGauss just needs something more to make it worth taking, maybe keep it as is while removing charge-up as suggested many times before.
#8
Posted 13 May 2018 - 08:26 PM
#9
Posted 13 May 2018 - 08:28 PM
N0ni, on 13 May 2018 - 08:24 PM, said:
LGauss just needs something more to make it worth taking, maybe keep it as is while removing charge-up as suggested many times before.
I really don't think charge-up is the problem. Running a pair instead of twin AC/10 on something with 6x ERML is not a half-bad build as-is because they run heat-negative and the velocity goes well with the beams at those ranges; adding a single point of damage might push it into "actually good" territory.
#10
Posted 13 May 2018 - 09:03 PM
And on the IS in particular, hell no! IS Mechs don't build the sort of alpha that needs addressing, I think. There's some fun builds with ballistics and lasers out there which shouldn't be nerfed at all.
#11
Posted 13 May 2018 - 09:40 PM
#13
Posted 14 May 2018 - 07:44 AM
#14
Posted 14 May 2018 - 07:50 AM
Hazeclaw, on 14 May 2018 - 07:44 AM, said:
Eh, it isn't just the DS and nerf that they will nerf all MK II's....just like the Kodiak and Marauder IIC....RIP Spirit Bear .....
So no, stop nerfing Clan assaults or in general all assaults into barely mobile bunkers, not even a turrets bunker...
Edited by CK16, 14 May 2018 - 07:51 AM.
#17
Posted 14 May 2018 - 08:00 AM
You'll still have some builds that exceed a reasonable pinpoint alpha, but those are few and far between, and can be dealt with in less surprising ways, e.g. the hard no-penalty multiple Gauss charge limit.
For instance, with a 30 heat cap, you could go back to Gauss + 2 PPC, using 1 heat Gauss and 10 heat PPC. Maybe running those three linked items reduces your heat cap by 10, reflected on your HUD so you see that you can only fire the Gauss and 1 PPC simultaneously. Clans would be affected more, since their individual weapons produce more heat, blunting the huge payloads they can field.
Ghost heat may achieve similar results, but it's absolutely terrible at communicating the penalties to the player. Fire 1/10 of a second too fast? Boom, +15 heat.
#18
Posted 14 May 2018 - 08:01 AM
process, on 14 May 2018 - 08:00 AM, said:
Then builds that aren't using as many lasers are punished for something they didn't do. WTF.
#19
Posted 14 May 2018 - 08:19 AM
Snowbluff, on 14 May 2018 - 08:01 AM, said:
The intent is to normalize lasers without injecting arbitrary rules, like ghost heat limits and linked weapons. I don't agree with this is 'punishing' in any way, rather bringing lasers in-line with the other weapon categories.
Edited by process, 14 May 2018 - 08:19 AM.
#20
Posted 14 May 2018 - 08:37 AM
Snowbluff, on 14 May 2018 - 07:57 AM, said:
30 damage limit is for PPFLD weapons. I think PGI's intended limit for laser weapons is around 55 damage.
5 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 5 guests, 0 anonymous users