Marlowe Lecter, on 23 July 2018 - 06:58 AM, said:
Never said that balance wasn't important.
No not directly, and probably not intentionally, but your argument would mean exactly that, which was my point. So if you do feel balance is important, you shouldn't like your argument either.
Marlowe Lecter, on 23 July 2018 - 06:58 AM, said:
You may have inferred that, but that's on you.
No, you made the argument, it's your job to explain it properly, so it's on you.
Marlowe Lecter, on 23 July 2018 - 06:58 AM, said:
I said that the difference in the number of AMS a clan mech can carry vs. what an IS mech can carry is not imbalanced. Its a total non-issue. As a matter of fact I said that the very thing that was being complained about is balanced in Faction Play. Quite the opposite of saying balance isn't important.
I also noted that the OP and the other person I quoted appeared to have an RP reason not to run Clan mechs in QP and gave them an option that, quite frankly, empowers them in a way that crying for PGI to change something that doesn't need changing will never do.
That was a previous argument you made and not the one I am arguing. To me if I summed all your arguments up it would be like this: "I don't think they are imbalanced, but it doesn't matter because you can just take the OP option, so balance doesn't matter." At least that is what you said. I doubted that is what you meant so I wanted to highlight the error in the last of the arguments.