KursedVixen, on 02 January 2019 - 03:03 AM, said:
On what grounds Can Crytek sue for people changing engines? that seems a little illegal if you ask me.
CryTek and CIG made a Game License Agrement, a contract about money, copy rights and support.
CryTek sued CIG in California for breaking parts of that contract.
CryTek claimed that GIG has only the right to make one Game (Star Citizen) with their Engine, and selling Squadron 42 without Star Citizen on it's own is using the License for two games.
CryTek also claimed that CIG promised to deliver all Bugs they found and Engine improvements to them, but didn't
CryTek claimed a lot of other stuff (as usual in such lawsuites).
CIG told the Judge to dismiss the lawsuite, but only a part of the claims haven been dismissed.
CIG added the Game License Agrement to their motion to dismiss, so it became public.
CryTek also told in their lawsuite that they created the Kickstarter Promo Video for Star Citizen and gave CIG the CryEngine License for a reduced price, so they are probably enraged that CIG switched the engine without terminating the license (that would CIG force to remove all CryEngine code from Star Citizen & Squadron 42) or fullfilling the promise to deliver engine improvments.
Chris Roberts Partner and CoFounder of CIG is also a former Lawyer of CryTek...
IMHO the whole thing is more a personal problem than a grab for money (CryTek gave Amazon a License for the CryEngine for a lot of money).
CryTek is a German Company founded by the sons of turkish imigrants, and if you do business with Germans or Turks that kind of action (getting the license for a reduced price and a lot of support, than breaking the contract) is an insult.
I doubt that PGI got the kind of support / license terms from CryTek that CIG have got. And I doubt that PGI didn't have fullfilled their obligations to CryTek.