Countdown To Warhammer Iic Release!
#41
Posted 15 February 2019 - 04:29 AM
Nonetheless, I think the mobility is a tad low. But we'll see.
#42
Posted 15 February 2019 - 04:37 AM
#43
Posted 15 February 2019 - 05:32 AM
Also, what is the name of the holiday bonus hero?
#44
Posted 15 February 2019 - 08:17 AM
#45
Posted 15 February 2019 - 10:11 AM
#46
Posted 15 February 2019 - 10:43 AM
#47
Posted 15 February 2019 - 01:47 PM
#48
Posted 15 February 2019 - 03:26 PM
#49
Posted 15 February 2019 - 03:36 PM
#50
Posted 15 February 2019 - 04:00 PM
Jay Leon Hart, on 15 February 2019 - 03:36 PM, said:
They probably took the Cataphract picture and realized "dear god the 'phract is huge, if we post pics of any other 70 tonners it'll look like we can't even scale our mechs right"
Edited by Psykmoe, 15 February 2019 - 04:01 PM.
#51
Posted 15 February 2019 - 04:46 PM
give it torso twist quirks and armor quirks for the arms for flavor.
done.
#52
Posted 15 February 2019 - 05:06 PM
Jay Leon Hart, on 15 February 2019 - 03:36 PM, said:
It's because the way they do the size comparisons now is to walk the mech around in the testing grounds and stand next to the ones that exist in there, most likely because the current mech bay view perspective doesn't allow for accurate size comparisons
#53
Posted 15 February 2019 - 06:42 PM
How can a 80 tonner be this small? It's shorter and skinnier than the Cataphract, a 70 tonner. And it's like half the frontal profile of a fellow 80 tonner, Awesome.
Unless the side profile is super thick, like a Marauder??
#54
Posted 15 February 2019 - 07:23 PM
#55
Posted 15 February 2019 - 07:40 PM
ImperialKnight, on 15 February 2019 - 06:42 PM, said:
How can a 80 tonner be this small? It's shorter and skinnier than the Cataphract, a 70 tonner. And it's like half the frontal profile of a fellow 80 tonner, Awesome.
Unless the side profile is super thick, like a Marauder??
I think the Whalehammer IIC's many little greeble details might be artificially increasing the mech's volume rating without adding much surface area for you to shoot at. That's my guess at least.
#56
Posted 16 February 2019 - 01:39 AM
What the hell...
Edited by Juodas Varnas, 16 February 2019 - 01:40 AM.
#57
Posted 16 February 2019 - 07:10 AM
#58
Posted 16 February 2019 - 10:44 AM
Audacious Aubergine, on 15 February 2019 - 05:06 PM, said:
They have the raw mech files, which we see every time they stream them painting mechs on Twitch. I've even seen them stand mechs next to each other in those programs, so they should be using that to do the size comparisons.
#60
Posted 16 February 2019 - 11:05 AM
LT. HARDCASE, on 16 February 2019 - 10:44 AM, said:
They have the raw mech files, which we see every time they stream them painting mechs on Twitch. I've even seen them stand mechs next to each other in those programs, so they should be using that to do the size comparisons.
Personally, I don't see anything bad in the way they do the scale comparisons now.
And doing it in testing grounds takes a lot less time than comparing their models in other programs.
6 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 6 guests, 0 anonymous users