#1
Posted 06 March 2019 - 06:31 AM
#2
Posted 06 March 2019 - 06:39 AM
#3
Posted 06 March 2019 - 09:00 AM
#4
Posted 06 March 2019 - 09:02 AM
#5
Posted 06 March 2019 - 10:52 AM
kamichiwa343, on 06 March 2019 - 06:31 AM, said:
The selling points of the 3D are JJs, 2 ballistics and the -20% UAC jam chance that comes with them. This sure invites dual UAC10, or a UAC20 builds. I used the 1X till now (and love it), but the 3D is on my shopping list.
#6
Posted 06 March 2019 - 11:13 AM
.
#7
Posted 06 March 2019 - 11:24 AM
#8
Posted 06 March 2019 - 01:08 PM
Aidan Crenshaw, on 06 March 2019 - 06:39 AM, said:
Not entirely true.
The quirk was left on HPPC for the AWS 8Q. Precedent was set from the very first itiration.
There is no reason HSL +1 therefore cannot be applied to other malingering mechs to make them fresh / fun and give some life into chassis.
#9
Posted 06 March 2019 - 01:59 PM
#10
Posted 06 March 2019 - 02:24 PM
justcallme A S H, on 06 March 2019 - 01:08 PM, said:
There is no reason HSL +1 therefore cannot be applied to other malingering mechs to make them fresh / fun and give some life into chassis.
I guess, but there's quite a difference between a PPC 'mech getting a PPC family quirk and, say, an
Having more HSL quirks being for a weapon "family" seems like the next step, but other than the mistake with the Awesome, aren't they all just based on stock loadouts?
Edited by Jay Leon Hart, 06 March 2019 - 03:12 PM.
#11
Posted 06 March 2019 - 03:11 PM
justcallme A S H, on 06 March 2019 - 01:08 PM, said:
Not entirely true.
The quirk was left on HPPC for the AWS 8Q. Precedent was set from the very first itiration.
There is no reason HSL +1 therefore cannot be applied to other malingering mechs to make them fresh / fun and give some life into chassis.
But Chris was pretty insistent that the +1 HSL regarding HPPCs on the Awsome was an error, and not working as intended, but was willing to let it stay for now while they monitor it , etc.
https://out.reddit.c...name=reddit.com
Point being, is that Chris wants to use the +1HSL quirks to support lore “flavor” not provide us with necessarily viable/useful/competitive builds. I mean, yes I would love it if he would in fact do this on a lot of mechs that could use it, but his own long standing and expressed view that quirks should not dictate a single optimal build totally goes against this.
#12
Posted 06 March 2019 - 04:15 PM
#14
Posted 06 March 2019 - 05:10 PM
A pair of PPC's and AC5's are still pretty good on it too.
#15
Posted 06 March 2019 - 05:36 PM
justcallme A S H, on 06 March 2019 - 01:08 PM, said:
Not entirely true.
The quirk was left on HPPC for the AWS 8Q. Precedent was set from the very first itiration.
There is no reason HSL +1 therefore cannot be applied to other malingering mechs to make them fresh / fun and give some life into chassis.
The awesome 8Q uses three PPCs stock config though. Heavy PPCs are at least in the same family of weapons as PPCs. So allowing other PPC weapons like HPPCs to give the awesome more options makes sense. I definitely would not call that setting a precedent.
While im all for buffing the Cataphract 3D, I feel it should be buffed for weapons it actually uses in its stock config. Namely autocannons and lasers. Not PPCs and gauss.
If you really want a Gauss/ERPPC Cataphract ask for PGI to add the Cataphract 4L variant to the game. That uses Gauss/ERPPC stock and gets ECM. I dont think it gets jumpjets though. But even then im not sure a HSL quirk would be justified since it doesnt use x1 Gauss/x2 ERPPC as its stock loadout. Although it would be way easier to justify an HSL quirk on that variant than the one that doesnt even use Gauss/ERPPC at all.
Edited by Khobai, 06 March 2019 - 05:47 PM.
#16
Posted 06 March 2019 - 06:49 PM
justcallme A S H, on 06 March 2019 - 01:08 PM, said:
Not entirely true.
The quirk was left on HPPC for the AWS 8Q. Precedent was set from the very first itiration.
There is no reason HSL +1 therefore cannot be applied to other malingering mechs to make them fresh / fun and give some life into chassis.
That was PGI's mistake on not understanding their own rules regarding quirks.
#17
Posted 06 March 2019 - 09:26 PM
#20
Posted 07 March 2019 - 12:23 AM
Stonefalcon, on 06 March 2019 - 06:49 PM, said:
Yeah I know. Said that in my post it was an error.
However the precedent as I said - has been set. There is no reason it can't be used as an almost stroke of genius to spark life into a LOT of malingering chassis.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users