34 replies to this topic

[LordNothing]

LT. HARDCASE, on 19 July 2019 - 01:26 PM, said:

It's 2019, you can stop being one of the people who is still spewing this kind of uninformed information.

hes just confusing the "magic fps" that movies use for something that is relevant for computer games. it might trick your brain into filling in the gaps, which makes for some great cinematography. but for games it would also increase the delay between input and being able to observe the response.

[-Pilgrim-]

I'm reading the thread and i still do not see the reason why i should build a ryzen3000 cpu. I'm planning to upgrade my 3rd rig currently has 4690k with gtx1070. I get 70-90fps with medium settings and (particles,shadows,postprocessing=LOW) but dips 40-50s, I feel its the cpu 4 thread causing it. I want stable 75-90 fps at least even with just medium settings. My 1st rig 8600k rtx2080 can hold it. I feel intel is still the way to go. But im still curious how ryzen 3600x or better performs.

Edited by -Pilgrim-, 13 September 2019 - 02:08 PM.

[MrXanthios]

how are your fps with that combo? my ryzen is still suffering a lot despite an update to 3rd gen and ram bumped up to 3000. I have a gtx 970, which is not a lot, but it can get stable 100+ fps on professionally coded games like BF1 and 5 at low

[-Pilgrim-]

MrXanthios, on 14 September 2019 - 02:35 PM, said:

how are your fps with that combo? my ryzen is still suffering a lot despite an update to 3rd gen and ram bumped up to 3000. I have a gtx 970, which is not a lot, but it can get stable 100+ fps on professionally coded games like BF1 and 5 at low

hi. What FPS do you get for medium and (shadows,particles, post processing = low and AAoff). thanks. I'm really curious with the new ryzen

[Celtic Warrior]

I just put together a 2600x system with a 570 gpu, up from an 8350. Have to say the 2600x is a huge step up. Need to upgrade my monitor to 144hrz I'm capped at 60.

[MrXanthios]

-Pilgrim-, on 16 September 2019 - 12:15 PM, said:

hi. What FPS do you get for medium and (shadows,particles, post processing = low and AAoff). thanks. I'm really curious with the new ryzen

I have everything at low, except texture at high, that's the usual settings I use for online shooters. I get around 70 fps at drop and it dips down in the 30-40 at first engagement when there's a lot of mech around. That's pretty bad considered the 6 cores at 4ghz and the old but still very decent gtx 970. Ram at 3000mhz. With same hardware I get around 120 fps in bf1 and 5 with same graphics settings. It's definitely not the hardware's fault. My wife's computer has a dual core intel pentium g4560 and a gtx1050ti with ram at 2400 mhz, I tried mwo there and it gets around 100 fps. Unfortunately the AMD population has been totally neglected by PGI.

[Joryl 1980]

MrXanthios, on 14 September 2019 - 02:35 PM, said:

how are your fps with that combo? my ryzen is still suffering a lot despite an update to 3rd gen and ram bumped up to 3000. I have a gtx 970, which is not a lot, but it can get stable 100+ fps on professionally coded games like BF1 and 5 at low

MrXanthios, on 16 September 2019 - 09:03 PM, said:

I have everything at low, except texture at high, that's the usual settings I use for online shooters. I get around 70 fps at drop and it dips down in the 30-40 at first engagement when there's a lot of mech around. That's pretty bad considered the 6 cores at 4ghz and the old but still very decent gtx 970. Ram at 3000mhz. With same hardware I get around 120 fps in bf1 and 5 with same graphics settings. It's definitely not the hardware's fault. My wife's computer has a dual core intel pentium g4560 and a gtx1050ti with ram at 2400 mhz, I tried mwo there and it gets around 100 fps. Unfortunately the AMD population has been totally neglected by PGI.

What resolution are you playing at as 1440p and 4k can make a huge difference over 1080p?

your GPU will do most of the lifting while gaming and will most likely be your bottleneck no matter what unless you are playing @720p, hell I'm using a Vega56 and a 2600x at 1440p and I have no issues with MWO...

Your 3000 series has 13%ish higher IPC then my CPU and I have no problems I also have 32gigs of ddr4 3200 RAM on one hand.. But anywho unless you have faulty hardware I bet if you check your cpu usage while gaming you will see that it is not in fact your bottleneck that card is getting old and has the faulty ram I.E 3.5 of good ram and 500 megs of crap ram which is why NVIDEA was sued over that card maybe you are bumping over 3.5 gigs?

[Jackal Noble]

Celtic Warrior, on 16 September 2019 - 01:50 PM, said:

I just put together a 2600x system with a 570 gpu, up from an 8350. Have to say the 2600x is a huge step up. Need to upgrade my monitor to 144hrz I'm capped at 60.

Try turning off V-sync in the game settings. If that doesn't work, something else is not set right. I get ~120 fps in game with a 6600k and gtx1060 a 40 inch samung 4k set at 2560 for this game.

[Celtic Warrior]

My monitor is only 60hrz so I'm capped by that, my fps never goes below that. Been looking for a new one.

[MrXanthios]

Joryl 1980, on 17 September 2019 - 11:17 AM, said:

What resolution are you playing at as 1440p and 4k can make a huge difference over 1080p?

your GPU will do most of the lifting while gaming and will most likely be your bottleneck no matter what unless you are playing @720p, hell I'm using a Vega56 and a 2600x at 1440p and I have no issues with MWO...

Your 3000 series has 13%ish higher IPC then my CPU and I have no problems I also have 32gigs of ddr4 3200 RAM on one hand.. But anywho unless you have faulty hardware I bet if you check your cpu usage while gaming you will see that it is not in fact your bottleneck that card is getting old and has the faulty ram I.E 3.5 of good ram and 500 megs of crap ram which is why NVIDEA was sued over that card maybe you are bumping over 3.5 gigs?

Neither the gpu nor the cpu gets 100% usage. No bottleneck there. Again Battlefield, which has a way better, newer, more complex graphics than MWO gets around 120 fps with the same hardware at 1080p. The game simply has problems working with amd cpus and the resources of your system are not used in their totality.

[O L L O]

This game is CPU-limited. This is well known. Single thread performance is king here.

I have an Intel CPU with 4 cores/8 threads locked at 4.6 ghz. Usual average is 120+ fps but I still get drops to the 40s and sometimes lower (with sound glitching out).

[Joryl 1980]

MrXanthios, on 18 September 2019 - 07:31 PM, said:

Neither the gpu nor the cpu gets 100% usage. No bottleneck there. Again Battlefield, which has a way better, newer, more complex graphics than MWO gets around 120 fps with the same hardware at 1080p. The game simply has problems working with amd cpus and the resources of your system are not used in their totality.

I haven't experienced problems but still yeah if this title is poory optimized and windows scheduler still has a hard time with all the cores Ryzen has brought to the table, ( it is getting better though ) but its just odd that I am not having the same issues with frame rate?

Are you playing at 4k?

[MrXanthios]

Joryl 1980, on 19 September 2019 - 08:30 AM, said:

I haven't experienced problems but still yeah if this title is poory optimized and windows scheduler still has a hard time with all the cores Ryzen has brought to the table, ( it is getting better though ) but its just odd that I am not having the same issues with frame rate?

Are you playing at 4k?

no playing at 1080p, I honestly don't know what to do. What cpu and gpu do u have? what fps are u getting?

[Joryl 1980]

MrXanthios, on 20 September 2019 - 09:15 PM, said:

no playing at 1080p, I honestly don't know what to do. What cpu and gpu do u have? what fps are u getting?

I know I have mine locked at 75hz with freesync @ 1440p ( that's my monitors refresh rate ) with a Vega 56 undervolted with HBM Overclocked, runs great. however thinking about it usually when I first load a match it lags for about 2 seconds about 10 seconds into a match but then runs buttery smooth?

[Papaspud]

This game is mostly CPU bound, and higher single core is better. I went from an old i7 3770 oc 4.4ghz to an i5 9600k oc 5.0 ghz, the difference was night and day using a 1070ti- I upgraded to a 2080 and it didn't make any noticeable difference in frame rates, in this game. Running at 3440 x 1440 on a gsync monitor- it rarely goes below 60, looking at you solaris city, to around 100 most of the time.

That being said, I still have the same stuttering problems at the start of the game I have always had, and it happens sometimes in match too.