Jump to content

Rotary Cannons Issue


8 replies to this topic

#1 Foxwalker

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Knight Errant
  • Knight Errant
  • 962 posts
  • LocationLost on Thunder Rift

Posted 04 August 2019 - 08:47 AM

Just curious, it seems like Rotary Cannons have a shorter duration recently (last week or so). Was there a code change I missed? Or am I just imagining it?

#2 Feral Clown

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 915 posts

Posted 04 August 2019 - 10:57 AM

I haven't heard anything about that change and the last patch notes didn't say anything about it or much else really.

The best way to resolve this issue however is to completely stop using rac's. Instead switch to AC's and UAC's.

#3 Flyby215

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Devoted
  • The Devoted
  • 901 posts
  • LocationThunder Bay

Posted 04 August 2019 - 12:04 PM

View PostFeral Clown, on 04 August 2019 - 10:57 AM, said:


The best way to resolve this issue however is to completely stop using rac's. Instead switch to AC's and UAC's.


BLASPHEMY!

#4 Feral Clown

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 915 posts

Posted 04 August 2019 - 12:16 PM

View PostFlyby215, on 04 August 2019 - 12:04 PM, said:


BLASPHEMY!


I tried?

#5 Foxwalker

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Knight Errant
  • Knight Errant
  • 962 posts
  • LocationLost on Thunder Rift

Posted 05 August 2019 - 12:13 PM

I would use UACs if they were not so unreliable. Often they jamb, even on a first click (and I am using mechs that have 20-30% jamb chance reduction. But back to RACs. I guess the shorter duration till jamb on them is subjective.

Thanks for replies.

#6 Gristle Missile

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Shredder
  • 275 posts

Posted 05 August 2019 - 12:22 PM

RAC2s have a far longer time to jam than RAC5s
I haven't noticed a difference but maybe you switched from 2 to 5? or unlucky with jams?

#7 Nightbird

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The God of Death
  • The God of Death
  • 7,518 posts

Posted 05 August 2019 - 01:01 PM

I love it when my victims are running RACs, no need to convince them to stop

#8 Kubernetes

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Blazing
  • The Blazing
  • 2,369 posts

Posted 05 August 2019 - 01:13 PM

View PostNightbird, on 05 August 2019 - 01:01 PM, said:

I love it when my victims are running RACs, no need to convince them to stop


True, but I have to admit that RACs are pretty fun to use. Sometimes you wanna feel like Rambo and just hold down the trigger as you hose down some poor dude out in the open. It's about the feelings!

#9 The6thMessenger

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Nova Captain
  • Nova Captain
  • 8,142 posts
  • LocationFrom a distance in an Urbie with a HAG, delivering righteous fury to heretics.

Posted 05 August 2019 - 04:29 PM

View PostFoxwalker, on 05 August 2019 - 12:13 PM, said:

I would use UACs if they were not so unreliable. Often they jamb, even on a first click (and I am using mechs that have 20-30% jamb chance reduction. But back to RACs. I guess the shorter duration till jamb on them is subjective.

Thanks for replies.


Well, RACs are good with hosing, but honestly you'd be better with landing most of your shots with a UAC battery than RACs to a moving target.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users