Edited by Groutknoll, 05 February 2020 - 01:50 AM.
Nascar
#321
Posted 05 February 2020 - 01:49 AM
#322
Posted 05 February 2020 - 03:31 AM
#323
Posted 05 February 2020 - 08:29 AM
Hazeclaw, on 04 February 2020 - 06:51 PM, said:
Its like dogs chasing the (slowest) rabbid,
no tactics, communication or thinking involved,
just pure instinct.
Edited by Kroete, 05 February 2020 - 08:45 AM.
#325
Posted 05 February 2020 - 10:50 AM
It takes two teams to nascar, one team will lose, nascar fails every time.
#328
Posted 05 February 2020 - 01:17 PM
#329
Posted 05 February 2020 - 01:26 PM
#330
Posted 05 February 2020 - 05:00 PM
RickySpanish, on 04 February 2020 - 10:42 AM, said:
That's not accurate.
At that point you're not identifying a tactic or a strategy but a state. Like saying you're falling. You can't say falling works 100% of the time because to work it must also not-work. The moment you say "100% of the time" you're using terms already defined by statistics, which makes the whole statement false because percentages and calling something a success means it must be testable, testable means it can fail.
The re-definition of nascar as being the state when both teams are rotating the same way at the same time can't be tested. It can't not-work because, by the redefining of the concept that's using, the results are irrelevant and if it's not exactly that thing then you're saying it's not nascar anymore.
So no. Either you define nascar as a tactic/strategy (which is more honest given that both teams can rotate but one can nascar, stringing out, while the other stays coordinated, one team can turn, etc) in which case it can be tested and measured to say it works or not and in what percentage it is successful, or you can say it's a term to describe the state of a match where both teams are rotating the same time in the same direction, which can not be tested in the way you're defining it. As it can't be tested it can't 'work' or 'not-work'. It's a state, not a result.
#331
Posted 05 February 2020 - 05:04 PM
#333
Posted 05 February 2020 - 05:41 PM
Nascar isn't a strategy. Nascar is specifically the result of two teams attempting to rotate into the back of one another.
Edited by Prototelis, 05 February 2020 - 05:44 PM.
#334
Posted 06 February 2020 - 04:21 AM
I'd certainly be wiling to start spending my money at the tracks again, lol.
#335
Posted 06 February 2020 - 06:11 AM
Gen Lee, on 06 February 2020 - 04:21 AM, said:
I'd certainly be wiling to start spending my money at the tracks again, lol.
Yeah we could even give the cars legs instead of wheels for uneven terrain, and separate them into four classes based on weight...
#336
Posted 06 February 2020 - 07:04 AM
Prototelis, on 05 February 2020 - 05:41 PM, said:
Nascar isn't a strategy. Nascar is specifically the result of two teams attempting to rotate into the back of one another.
Nope. As stated before, either nascar is a strategy as Hazeclaw described (which is true because a team can nascar while the other team does not. You can see this happen when your team is strung out like a string of pearls while the other team is grouped up, just as one example. Nobody is screaming "God damn it stop attempting to flank without regard for teammate positioning and group up or we're gonna get rekt!" They're saying "God damn it stop nascaring or we're gonna get rekt!")
Beyond which, as already stated, even if we take your inaccurate attempt to redefine nascar as a state the match can be in as opposed to the tactic/strategy it's generally used to refer to, that means it doesn't 'work'. It doesn't work or not work because it's not an action and can not be tested. Ergo it doesn't work every time nor can it be measured as a percentage because you're defining it as a state of being the match can be in. That's like saying 'early' works every time or 'hungry' works every time.
#338
Posted 06 February 2020 - 07:39 AM
Edited by Teenage Mutant Ninja Urbie, 06 February 2020 - 07:42 AM.
#340
Posted 06 February 2020 - 02:38 PM
4 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users