Psr Update And Hold On Patch.
#201
Posted 09 June 2020 - 11:07 AM
#202
Posted 09 June 2020 - 11:29 AM
Matches are unbalanced.
Causes of Problem -
PSR is basically an XP bar. Low population MM is pulling from all tiers.
Proposed Solution -
Change the way the tiers are decided.
Outcome -
All matches will still be unbalanced due to Low population MM pulling from all tiers. Change the tiers all you want it will still be the same as the MM uses all of the tiers to create a match. The valves are wide open and will remain wide open.
Alternate Solution -
Others have posted a better solution that is to change the MM to create teams for the matches in an A-B-A-B... manner. Highest tier player gets added to team A, next highest tier player gets added to team B, and so on until you have two equally matched teams.
This will create two evenly matched teams of people from all of the tiers. Each of the teams will contain the same number of players from each of the tiers.
*edited for spelling
Edited by Eatit, 09 June 2020 - 11:46 AM.
#203
Posted 09 June 2020 - 11:40 AM
This allows the better players (the ones who contribute the most to the team) to gain ranking and provides and incentive against suicide runs and rage quits.
#204
Posted 09 June 2020 - 12:03 PM
The proposed resolution is to better sort the player base into appropriate Tiers. Unfortunately due to the way the Match Maker creates matches it won't help. The MM grabs the first 24 people that are in the Tiers allowed and sorts based on mech size. Currently Tiers 4-1 are allowed to be matched together due to low population. The sort doesn't take PSR or Tier into account. It only takes mech size into account.
The Match Maker needs to make a second determination based on PSR. This becomes quite complicated as it has to sort by 2 variables now, Mech Size and Player Skill. The MM needs to put an equal number of players from each tier on each team. This will require quite a bit of programming skill to pull off. If it's even possible within the constraints of the current code.
Getting everyone in the appropriate Tier is a good start but you will also have to make changes to the MM to create evenly matched teams during low population. This is not a single solution problem. This is a combination problem.
I made this post to clarify my earlier post. I hope that someone with the ability to fix this issue sees this post and acts accordingly.
#205
Posted 09 June 2020 - 12:39 PM
I hope it gets implemented...it's much better than what we have now.
#206
Posted 09 June 2020 - 12:41 PM
#207
Posted 09 June 2020 - 01:08 PM
Lockheed_, on 09 June 2020 - 12:30 PM, said:
I agree with you it will be difficult to create more even matches, however I am still excited the way this is headed, here's why:
If they are willing to rework the matchmaker for about 1.500 players and for a game that does no longer get more content in terms of maps and mechs, then there's a good chance that the rework of the matchmaking system will be done with MWO 2.0 in mind. The matchmaking system was one of major talking points over the years, so if they now create a sytem together with the community and use it for MWO 2.0 this creates and excellent sales argument.
I agree that working with the community is a good thing. It may very well be an excellent sales argument IF they do it right. Right now they don't seem to understand the full breadth of the issue. They are only working on fixing one segment of the multi-segment issue.
#208
Posted 09 June 2020 - 01:14 PM
Reduce the score for damage by LRM outside 500 meters and this might have a chance. As it stands, nope.
Edited by Zulu211, 09 June 2020 - 01:14 PM.
#209
Posted 09 June 2020 - 01:31 PM
Zerex, on 09 June 2020 - 03:36 AM, said:
This Graph?
That leads to players gaining PSR over other players that lost PSR even thou performing better in the match.
I think it will even out over time, the better players will increase until they are playing with similar skill players and then hover - that should be the point, right?
#210
Posted 09 June 2020 - 01:43 PM
Zulu211, on 09 June 2020 - 01:14 PM, said:
Reduce the score for damage by LRM outside 500 meters and this might have a chance. As it stands, nope.
you will see this I am sure.... you will also see an increase in triple and quad ams mechs, basically making those lrmboats lunch for any light mech pilot
#211
Posted 09 June 2020 - 01:48 PM
Paul Inouye, on 08 June 2020 - 02:52 PM, said:
win - Base value for winning. loss - Base value for losing. teamkills - Loss for team killing. spottingassist - Gain for spotting an enemy and that enemy takes damage. (Press R) componentdestroyed - Gain for destroying a component on an enemy. death - Loss for dying. capturewin - Bonus gain for winning by capture. captureassist - Gain for helping others capture a capture point by being in the capture radius. suicide - Loss for suiciding. saviorkill - Gain for helping a teammate under fire and you get the kill shot on his highest damaging opponent. defensivekill - Gain for helping a teammate under fire and you get the kill shot on an opponent damaging them. uavkill - Gain for any kills happening under a UAV you deployed. uavlockeddmg - Gain for any damage done to a target that is under your UAV. uavdetection - Gain for any new enemy detected by your UAV. counterECM - Gain for countering enemy ECM. counterECMLockedDmg - Gain for damage done to enemies under your counter ECM. turretkill - Gain for killing a turret. killblow - Gain for getting the killing blow on your enemy. killassist - Gain for damage done to enemies upon kill but you didn't explicitly get the kill shot. teamdmg - Loss for team damage done. damagedone - Gain for damage done to enemies. killmostdmg - Gain for getting the kill shot and you did the most damage to your enemy. solokill - Gain for killing an enemy without the assistance of your teammates. scouting - Gain for targeting enemies without damage being done. flanking - Gain for being out of LoS to your enemy and behind enemy line. capture - Gain for capturing a capture zone. capturepulse - Gain for time you are capturing in a capture zone. firstcapture - Gain for capturing the first capture zone in a match. brawling - Gain for being in combat agaist multiple opponents. tagdmg - Gain for any damage done to an enemy you have tagged. tagkill - Gain for any kill done to an enemy you have tagged. narckill - Gain for any kill done to an enemy you have narced. hitandrun - Gain for attacking an enemy and escaping their LoS for an amount of time. tagstealth - Gain for tagging an enemy behind enemies and not being targeted by them. lanceformation - Gain for time spent near lancemates. protectmedium - Gain for killing an enemy who is attacking a medium class teammate. protectlight - Gain for killing an enemy who is attacking a light class teammate. protectproximity - Gain for killing an enemy who is near any teammate. powercell_pickup - Gain for picking up a power cell. powercell_dropoff - Gain for dropping off a power cell. incrusion_destruction - Gain for destroying objective objects in Incursion. kill_powercell_carrier - Gain for killing a power cell carrier. ams_missile_destroyed - Gain for missiles destroyed by your AMS system. matchscore_scale - A multiplier used to reduce the sum of all match score activity to keep numbers reasonable.
So this will be implemented when yall make MWO using Unreal Engine? *wink wink* *nudge nudge*
#212
Posted 09 June 2020 - 02:02 PM
#213
Posted 09 June 2020 - 02:10 PM
The match maker does not separate the two team based on psr or tier. It sorts the team based on mech size.
In the current and proposed system one team can have all tier 1 and the other team all tier 4. The unbalanced teams will continue because balance is based on luck of the draw not on player skill/tier.
They need to fix both problems to fix the problem. If they only get people in the correct tier it won't change anything.
#214
Posted 09 June 2020 - 02:13 PM
SirHavan, on 09 June 2020 - 01:31 PM, said:
It could... if this happens in 1% of matches, if this is happening in 15-20% of matches, no it will never balance out right. As i have said its not the worst system and i do think it would by and large work correctly, but there are better systems that are just as easy to implement.
#215
Posted 09 June 2020 - 02:18 PM
#216
Posted 09 June 2020 - 02:20 PM
Saint OZ, on 09 June 2020 - 02:02 PM, said:
#217
Posted 09 June 2020 - 02:21 PM
SirHavan, on 09 June 2020 - 01:31 PM, said:
No it won't even out. All the tiers play together right now. It won't matter what tier you are in you will still be playing with everyone else. Players will still be put into teams based on mech size not on tier. The teams will still be unbalanced. If the population was large enough that the MM could make matches pulled from a single tier or two then sure it may balance out. But it can't because there aren't enough players.
The better players will still be playing with everyone else. As long as population remains low they will never only play each other.
#218
Posted 09 June 2020 - 03:35 PM
#219
Posted 09 June 2020 - 03:44 PM
If you plan on doing a PSR that has a "no change" section based on that match's MS, then you may want to consider resetting everyone's PSR to Tier 3. That way those that consistently net a negative PSR in matches will go down, those that net a positive PSR will go up, and the no changers will stay at Tier 3. Otherwise, if you start everyone out at Tier 5, those who score well enough that end up in the "no change" range will be stuck with the net negative PSR players since the net negative players will have no ground to lose.
#220
Posted 09 June 2020 - 03:48 PM
I could elaborate more but I'm tired.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users