Jump to content

Improving The Thunderbolt

BattleMechs Balance Loadout

22 replies to this topic

#1 Wildstreak

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Civil Servant
  • Civil Servant
  • 5,154 posts

Posted 13 February 2021 - 01:20 PM

With both this snipped part of the roadmap

View PostInnerSphereNews, on 29 January 2021 - 06:29 PM, said:


QUARTER 3 - NEW CONTENT + CONTINUED IMPROVEMENTS

‘Mechs
  • Quirks / Set of 8's for Under Performers Pass 1



and the Timber Wolf topic, I tried asking for a section where we could discuss over the changes to some Mech quirks in the vain hope when Quirks pass comes, they might consider what we say.

From recently using 1 and talk about the Clan Timber, let's discuss a IS Heavy the Thunderbolt. I got 'em all even the Hero and loved them when they had their day. They still have tanking potential and LFE may even open up new builds but one thing is a problem. All 4 not counting Top Dog were given 1 or more quirks making one weapon stand above others to be boated. This was fine years ago but not today. Of course you can say ignore them and do what you want but still I think it is time to change some to meet better goals.

Goals of Thunderbolt requirking:
1 - Quirks must allow as much build variety as possible, players find it stale when weapon specific quirks seem to push you towards boating one thing above all others.
2 - Nothing here is intended to make any meta, just to make them worthwhile. Basically aim for middle of the Tier List like should be done when balancing any characters in games with Tier Lists. Based off Grimech's 5 tiers, that means B-Tier performer. Even Meta players prefer finding those builds, not being pushed. Never forget the famous Thunderbolt-9S Scandal.
3 - Bringing back a Mech known for decent performance and frontlining though it may be usable in a couple other roles.
4 - Actually making the Ballistic and Missile slots worth considering instead of being ignored as before, the 5S and 9S had nothing but that will be different now especially with new weapons and quirk types.

So I have come up with my own ideas to put each variant into a few roles player's can choose from and will give general descriptions of these.

TOP DOG - Hero, sometimes the Pay for Brawler
Currently the only one on Grim's with two builds but only one makes it in the Tiers at the A level, the 5ERLL is not Tiered. I look at quirks and remember I used it as a 8MPL brawler back in the day, you may say why since the 5SS was pushed for that but Top Dog allowed 1 additional MPL and those weapon quirks on the 5SS mean little compared to the Structure Quirks the Hero has. I actually kept track of both 5SS and TD MPL Brawl performance as I sued both extensively and they were equal, so much for quirk differences.
I think having so many more Structure Quirks, the generic Range quirks and 9 Energy slots cannot be improved upon but maybe I am wrong. For now I say leave it alone, remember it is bad to make a Pay for Mech so good, P2W is bad.

5SS - The Free Brawler whose Missile slot is ignored
Since this performed even with the Dog, in a Energy build it needs a way to stand out from that besides being the one you can get for free and having 2 less Energy slots. This might mean giving it 3 Torso and 2 Arm Structure quirks similar yet different than the Dogs Torso and Leg ones.
Now the problem, it is the only Thunderbolt with 1 Missile slot, part of this problem will be seen below. I do not know about other players but I see 1 Missile slot, one thing I think of is, "can I take the biggest ****ing Missile weapon possible and use it?" That means LRM20, MRM40, SRM6 and SSRM6 all seen almost never due to 2 things, Spread and Cooldown so either this variant needs generic quirks in those to make Big Missile launchers worth using or this could be a rare exception of making specific quirks for those 4 weapons, I prefer the first option for simplicity.
I am sure people can figure out different Energy builds easy so here is an example of a potential build using the Missile slot with even a AMS though you can replace that for those who do not run one. I used the Missile Launcher with the most tonnage so it can be modified for the other 4 big ones easy and still uses the largest LFE.

5SS Quirks Summary
Structure for 3 Torsos and 2 Arms.
Missile Spread and Cooldown.
Maybe 1 Energy quirk different than Range, Dog has that.

9SE - Jumpbolt
With my new view of the 9S not being so ERPPC focused and 3 Thunderbolts no longer pushing sniping only, I think the 9SE can allow focus on a variety of Long Range Energy builds though could also Brawl with Missiles + Energy and mobility.
The JJs are the big thing here they will be used in one of 3 ways.
A - Meta single JJ for improved turning and clearing low obstacles.
B - Max 4JJs losing 4 tons to gain as much height as possible and reach places other Thunderbotls cannot.
C - Those times you want JJs and have 2-3 tons to fill with nothing else.
Having the second fewest Energy hardpoints makes me want to use big ones (PPCs, LPLs, LLs) more so I could see generic PPC family quirks, maybe minor LPL + LL.
For the Missile side I do not see this as a LRMer due to hardpoint placement, best I could think of is this and I am not impressed so MRMs and SRMs only thus either 1 each generic Energy + Missile or 2 Missile quirks for Missile + Energy Brawling.
This is also the only Thunderbolt with no weapons in the Left Torso so should the Torso structure be kept or more RT focused?

9SE Quirks Summary
Possible change to RT Structure doubled, LT no benefit.
PPC / LPL / LL quirks of some kind TBD.
1 Energy + 1 Missile or 2 Missile quirks for Jump Brawlers.

Before the last 2 I should again mention these are the ones with Ballistics that are not quirked right now. Despite Right Arm placement, I believe they should have something to encourage consideration either for Right side corner poking or just mixed use. Looking at Ballistic weapons, I could see each variant focused on benefiting 1 Ballistic family type.
Machine Guns - I cannot see myself using them, seems they are preferred when 4+ slots are available so I am neutral on quirking MGs.
ACs - possible but with so many other Mechs using standard ACs, maybe use one of the 3 below.
LBX - Combine a Spread reduction with a Missile Crit quirk could make an interesting build using no Energy.
Gauss - No Heavy can fit. Could be quirked for GR or LGR, not a big Gauss user to know how.
UACs - I can see a small generic UAC Jam quirk of 5% for UAC10, UAC5 or even 2UAC2.
RACs - We need more RAC quirked Mechs besides the RFL-8D, question is if this is one of those to consider. Thunderbotls do not strike me as DPS Mechs except Pulse Brawlers.

5S - Jackbolt (Jack or All Trades)
Of the 4 bought for CB, I think this one is best suited to allow players the most build flexibility with all 3 weapon types spread all over and the Missiles in the Left Torso by themselves letting you easily go with MRM60 plus losing no weapon slots like other variants when using MRM60. Only needs generic quirks for all 3 weapon types plus a possible specific minor quirk for UAC / LBX / Gauss.
You can even do a mix of all 3 weapons like this build and swap out the SMR4s for MRM10s or a MRM20 and 1 less ML.

5S Quirks Summary
Keep LT + RT Structure.
Energy quirk.
Missile quirk.
Ballistic quirk.
UAC / LBX / Gauss.

9S - Anti-Missilebolt
No more PPC sniping, get rid of it. Similar to the 5S but with certain differences.
Pro A - 2 More Energy spots.
Pro B - Missile in RT and Ballistic in RA allows Ballistic + Missile only build as side poker if desired.
Pro C - Dual AMS at a time when more players are doing that.
Con A - Shares Missile + Energy in RT making it hard to mount large launchers there and not lose Energy weapons.
Con B - Using Dual AMS means losing 3-4 tons despite more hardpoints than 5S.
Overall it struggles in certain ways compared to a 5S but has its unique strengths that I believe balance out and it can get similar treatment as the 5S.
I would like to see the 5S get 1 specific Ballistic family quirk and the 9S get a different one.

9S Quirks Summary
Keep LT + RT Structure.
Energy quirk.
Missile quirk.
Ballistic quirk.
UAC / LBX / Gauss whichever the 5S did not get.

#2 FupDup

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 26,888 posts
  • LocationThe Keeper of Memes

Posted 13 February 2021 - 01:29 PM

I'd like a larger twist radius (some variants only twist 80 degrees), a bit more agility overall, and proliferation of the Top Dog's durability quirks to all variants (and make them armor instead of structure). Make it brawlier since it's a mech that was known for brawliness and because it's practically a walking brick in terms of geometry. Other mechs do ranged pokey poke better, give me a tank.

Maybe Flamer quirks for the variants that have them because Flamer quirks are so rare and it would help the chassis stand out (also compliments the brawler role).

Variant-specific:
TDR-5SS: Replace MPL range with STD laser range because the mech doesn't even carry MPLs in its base loadout
TDR-5S: Replace Large Laser cooldown with STD laser cooldown or just roll it into the generic energy cooldown, also add 50% MG RoF for flavor (oh no you have the equivalent of 3 MGs now, so OP so stronk)
TDR-9S: ERPPC quirks become PPC-all-type, also add 50% MG RoF for flavor like the 5S

None of them should get Gauss or AC quirks because none of them come equipped with them by default. If you want a Dakkabolt or Gaussbolt then ask for PGI to add the actual dakka variants like TDR-5D, TDR-5SD, TDR-7SE, and/or TDR-9NAIS.

Edited by FupDup, 13 February 2021 - 01:36 PM.


#3 PocketYoda

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Shredder
  • Shredder
  • 4,147 posts
  • LocationAustralia

Posted 13 February 2021 - 07:03 PM

Looks great, again a priority over the clan stuff e.g. Timber wolves.

Edited by Samial, 13 February 2021 - 07:03 PM.


#4 w0qj

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Hidden Wolf
  • Hidden Wolf
  • 3,783 posts
  • Google+: Link
  • Facebook: Link
  • LocationAt your 6 :)

Posted 14 February 2021 - 04:16 AM

Err...what is this famous Thunderbolt-9S Scandal?
(Sorry, new around here, missed all the drama...)

View PostWildstreak, on 13 February 2021 - 01:20 PM, said:

...the famous Thunderbolt-9S Scandal.


#5 N A S C A R

    Member

  • PipPip
  • 22 posts

Posted 14 February 2021 - 04:27 AM

View Postw0qj, on 14 February 2021 - 04:16 AM, said:

Err...what is this famous Thunderbolt-9S Scandal?
(Sorry, new around here, missed all the drama...)

Long time ago, Thunderbolt-9S kill everything and everyone with his 3 ERPPCs

#6 The6thMessenger

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Nova Captain
  • Nova Captain
  • 8,104 posts
  • LocationFrom a distance in an Urbie with a HAG, delivering righteous fury to heretics.

Posted 14 February 2021 - 04:52 AM

View PostN A S C A R, on 14 February 2021 - 04:27 AM, said:

Long time ago, Thunderbolt-9S kill everything and everyone with his 3 ERPPCs


Let it do it again.

#7 Wildstreak

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Civil Servant
  • Civil Servant
  • 5,154 posts

Posted 16 February 2021 - 05:38 PM

View Postw0qj, on 14 February 2021 - 04:16 AM, said:

Err...what is this famous Thunderbolt-9S Scandal?
(Sorry, new around here, missed all the drama...)

When first quirked for ERPPCs, they were so good comp teams were running them including 12 mans with 6+ 9Ss using ERPPCs and wasting things. Banhammer hit massively lowering the quirks, 9S disappeared from high level play.

That said, seems the Thunderbolt still has 1 value, kicking some Awesomes back down into junk tiers sadly.
Have had a pair of Awesomes (T and V) as MRM60 + 4ML for some time and done pretty good with them.
Then I took this TDR-5S for a spin, hotter than I expected but still put out the same damage as the Awesomes. Have since removed the 3ML for 2 more DHS and a TC1 because not much room for anything else. You could run the same MRM60 only on the 9S and 9SE and expect to do good if you are tired of all Energy Thunderbolts.

#8 PocketYoda

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Shredder
  • Shredder
  • 4,147 posts
  • LocationAustralia

Posted 18 February 2021 - 12:26 AM

View PostWildstreak, on 16 February 2021 - 05:38 PM, said:

When first quirked for ERPPCs, they were so good comp teams were running them including 12 mans with 6+ 9Ss using ERPPCs and wasting things. Banhammer hit massively lowering the quirks, 9S disappeared from high level play.

That said, seems the Thunderbolt still has 1 value, kicking some Awesomes back down into junk tiers sadly.
Have had a pair of Awesomes (T and V) as MRM60 + 4ML for some time and done pretty good with them.
Then I took this TDR-5S for a spin, hotter than I expected but still put out the same damage as the Awesomes. Have since removed the 3ML for 2 more DHS and a TC1 because not much room for anything else. You could run the same MRM60 only on the 9S and 9SE and expect to do good if you are tired of all Energy Thunderbolts.


Thats the issue here these banhammers always ruin the mechs, not tone them down.. always makes them borderline unplayable for years.

There is no middle ground.

#9 The pessimistic optimist

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 2,377 posts

Posted 18 February 2021 - 12:39 AM

Right now best think you can do with the Thunder Bolt is a single large MRM launcher and lasers thats really good but that really the only effective build right now. More variety would be welcomed

Edited by SirSmokes, 18 February 2021 - 12:41 AM.


#10 Natural Predator

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Shredder
  • Shredder
  • 690 posts

Posted 18 February 2021 - 07:44 AM

I still do work in the thunderbolt, not sure how much buffing it needs. Maybe a couple of the weaker variants I guess. But the thing can’t still bring it if you know how to build it

#11 Natural Predator

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Shredder
  • Shredder
  • 690 posts

Posted 18 February 2021 - 09:22 AM

View PostSirSmokes, on 18 February 2021 - 12:39 AM, said:

Right now best think you can do with the Thunder Bolt is a single large MRM launcher and lasers thats really good but that really the only effective build right now. More variety would be welcomed

Unless your talking a single specific variant that is not even remotely true.

TOP DOG Laser vomit hero

TDR-5SS Wub Bolt

Edited by Trashtier, 18 February 2021 - 09:32 AM.


#12 The pessimistic optimist

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 2,377 posts

Posted 18 February 2021 - 11:24 AM

View PostTrashtier, on 18 February 2021 - 09:22 AM, said:

Unless your talking a single specific variant that is not even remotely true.

TOP DOG Laser vomit hero

TDR-5SS Wub Bolt


I use to run builds like that but once I put a big MRM launcher on them those builds felt kind of weak. You can fill up on smaller lasers and the big MRM launcher and have more punch and a high mount weapon you can fire over cover. I still run one of them as a pulse boat but MRM versions do better Nothing wrong with those builds at all mind you. My 9S has a nice fat ghost heat free 70 alpha

Edited by SirSmokes, 18 February 2021 - 11:30 AM.


#13 w0qj

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Hidden Wolf
  • Hidden Wolf
  • 3,783 posts
  • Google+: Link
  • Facebook: Link
  • LocationAt your 6 :)

Posted 18 February 2021 - 07:28 PM

Yeah, MRM + Medium Lasers and you'll peek around corners (hint: your MRM is on only one shoulder).
With your fast speed + peek around corners, you can actually drive back your foes!

Skill-tree leveled up my Thunderbolt TDR-5S(S) entirely this way!
(and it was FUN!)

#14 Natural Predator

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Shredder
  • Shredder
  • 690 posts

Posted 19 February 2021 - 08:33 AM

View PostSirSmokes, on 18 February 2021 - 11:24 AM, said:


I use to run builds like that but once I put a big MRM launcher on them those builds felt kind of weak. You can fill up on smaller lasers and the big MRM launcher and have more punch and a high mount weapon you can fire over cover. I still run one of them as a pulse boat but MRM versions do better Nothing wrong with those builds at all mind you. My 9S has a nice fat ghost heat free 70 alpha

I will 1v1 you with the top dog anytime you want to prove why you are incorrect.

#15 The pessimistic optimist

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 2,377 posts

Posted 19 February 2021 - 08:35 AM

View PostTrashtier, on 19 February 2021 - 08:33 AM, said:

I will 1v1 you with the top dog anytime you want to prove why you are incorrect.


It's not built for one v ones silly. If yea want to build a mechs for duels that great but that not how I build mine and I am pretty sure I could hold my own with it even thought it's not

Edited by SirSmokes, 19 February 2021 - 08:36 AM.


#16 Natural Predator

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Shredder
  • Shredder
  • 690 posts

Posted 19 February 2021 - 09:51 AM

View PostSirSmokes, on 19 February 2021 - 08:35 AM, said:


It's not built for one v ones silly. If yea want to build a mechs for duels that great but that not how I build mine and I am pretty sure I could hold my own with it even thought it's not


Well any good build should be able to battle 1v1. I would maintain that the builds I provided are superior to mrm+ lasers. It’s not a contest or skill of pilots as much. As why what you propose is suboptimal use of the build. That’s not to say it’s “bad” but top dog laser vomit or TSS wubs given even skilled pilots should out class your build easily.

Edited by Trashtier, 19 February 2021 - 09:52 AM.


#17 The pessimistic optimist

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 2,377 posts

Posted 19 February 2021 - 10:15 AM

View PostTrashtier, on 19 February 2021 - 09:51 AM, said:

Well any good build should be able to battle 1v1. I would maintain that the builds I provided are superior to mrm+ lasers. It’s not a contest or skill of pilots as much. As why what you propose is suboptimal use of the build. That’s not to say it’s “bad” but top dog laser vomit or TSS wubs given even skilled pilots should out class your build easily.


Incorrect if its team play some build are not idea for 1v1 but will fill that role better then a mech build for 1v1. The high mount mrm is for hill humping to stay in cover to weak enemy armor as it comes in. Once the battle is engaged if I used it well the enemy is nice and soften up and ready for some nice fat 70 alphas Your lower mounts will not let you do that and the lower range of your lasers limits your engagement range. There is nothing wrong with that build but it not trying to do the same thing apples and oranges.

Edited by SirSmokes, 19 February 2021 - 10:19 AM.


#18 Natural Predator

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Shredder
  • Shredder
  • 690 posts

Posted 19 February 2021 - 11:44 AM

View PostSirSmokes, on 19 February 2021 - 10:15 AM, said:


Incorrect if its team play some build are not idea for 1v1 but will fill that role better then a mech build for 1v1. The high mount mrm is for hill humping to stay in cover to weak enemy armor as it comes in. Once the battle is engaged if I used it well the enemy is nice and soften up and ready for some nice fat 70 alphas Your lower mounts will not let you do that and the lower range of your lasers limits your engagement range. There is nothing wrong with that build but it not trying to do the same thing apples and oranges.

Well then for science I suggest we put it to the test. Since you feel 1v1 is an inappropriate venue to disprove your mech build. Might I suggest a 12 v 12 private lobby? I’m sure I can scrape together 12 players and 12 laser vomit top dogs.

#19 The pessimistic optimist

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 2,377 posts

Posted 19 February 2021 - 11:47 AM

View PostTrashtier, on 19 February 2021 - 11:44 AM, said:

Well then for science I suggest we put it to the test. Since you feel 1v1 is an inappropriate venue to disprove your mech build. Might I suggest a 12 v 12 private lobby? I’m sure I can scrape together 12 players and 12 laser vomit top dogs.


Don't have 11 teammates and if I were to do this test I would want team mates I play with regularly. Not in a unit right now. On top of normal team games wouldn't be 12 Thunder Bolts vs 12 Thunder Bolts I would want it to be normal team composition

Edited by SirSmokes, 19 February 2021 - 11:56 AM.


#20 Wolfos31

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Mercenary
  • The Mercenary
  • 271 posts

Posted 19 February 2021 - 12:14 PM

View PostTrashtier, on 19 February 2021 - 11:44 AM, said:

Well then for science I suggest we put it to the test. Since you feel 1v1 is an inappropriate venue to disprove your mech build. Might I suggest a 12 v 12 private lobby? I’m sure I can scrape together 12 players and 12 laser vomit top dogs.


I'd be down for this. In general it's fun to try silly matches like this you'd never see in QP.

I agree with SirSmokes though that it's not very accurate to actual QP matches though. Since you'd never see that mech composition.

Also in that 12v12 my money would be on the Top Dogs. They can strip the torso carrying the MRM 30 or 40 easier than the other way around and there goes a bunch of the firepower. MRMs are great weapons (MRM60 Quickdraw) but they're for softening up targets more than securing kills. Many a time I've opened up a mech for a team mate with PPFLD to get the kill.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users