Jump to content

The Future Of Mwo With Road Map

Gameplay Store Balance

37 replies to this topic

#1 Buster Machine 0

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • CS 2021 Bronze Champ
  • CS 2021 Bronze Champ
  • 224 posts
  • LocationRepping TharHes Industries on a laptop

Posted 21 October 2020 - 04:17 PM

o7 Fellow Mechwarriors, With MWO at a crossroads and the franchise at stake it is now a key moment for the all the community's voices to be heard. These are my following suggestions and a plan on what I believe would bring long term success to MWO.

A quick background on myself, I work in the airsoft industry as a Senior Technician and airsoft weapon and accessory developer for a small company. (Airsoft weapons development is basically a meme without any balancing oversight whatsoever) I’m also consistently a top .2% player according to Jarls in MWO as a casual playing on a laptop and have been playing Mechwarrior since Mechwarrior 2. Though I am a Starsieger at heart and a MWO whale by wallet.

I will be breaking my suggested improvements into rough timeline based on what I understand would be the most beneficial and easiest to implement.

1. Urgent (Changes that needs to be done ASAP to get MWO on its feet and profitable without being too time consuming to implement.)
2. Soon (improvements that the game needs to be made in the near future)
3. Long Term (Features that will grow the game and cannot be implemented immediately)

I will further be adding these tags with relationship to these categories

(Sustainability)
(Player Retention)
(Balance)
(Gameplay)
(Competitive)

Urgent


1. Offer rewards between MWO and MW5 A reward that you can redeem in MWO for beating the MW5 campaign will increase interest in both franchises and bring pilots to MWO as the Mechwarrior franchise’s defacto "endgame". Perhaps a MW5 unique chassis variant or the ability to select any MW5 mech you own and have it imported into MWO with an (L) modifier and c-bill bonus. (Limit one per copy of MW5 of course) And on the flip side, a skin that you unlock in MW5 simply by having a MWO account. (Sustainability) (Player Retention)

2. More tiers of starter packs on both the steam and epic store The Solaris starter pack is great; however, it might be too much of an investment for individuals looking to get into a free to play game. Lower priced options with a non-overlapping hero mech offerings would be more palatable for interested players. (Sustainability)

3. Platform Diversification Many games are sold on both the Epic store as well as Steam. People tend to be separated by the social and gaming platforms they use. By offering both MW5 and MWO on both platforms, it will eliminate the possibility of players being unaware of the existence of the other game. Additionally, a mobile mechlab app with 3d models, build exporting, and mech emote/pose options would really turn this game into an obsession. (Sustainability) (Player Retention)

4. Conspicuous presence of MWO’s anti-cheat From what I have heard MWO has an anti-cheat function, however it seems that the majority of the community is not aware of it. The lack of a conspicuous visible presence of an MWO anti-cheat is causing some players to believe others are less than legitimate and is leading to MWO ragequits with rampant hackusations and /uninstall. By simply adding a conspicuous .png of an anti-cheat function such as Pirahna Byte Anti-Cheat™ to the corner of the launch screen, a feature that 99% of all successful arena shooters have is long overdue and will go very far in instilling player confidence in the legitimacy of the product, playerbase, and a very important part of increasing player retention rates. (Competitive) (Player Retention) (Sustainability)

5. Opt in AFK and DC light or medium backfill mechanic One of the biggest issues affecting the matchmaker are players going AFK or DC’ing at the start of the match. A light/medium backfill options checkbox which is enabled by default will not only speed up the queue but reduce the number of stomps caused by a dc or afk player. A rough functionality of this mechanic would be after a mech has been inactive for 15-20 seconds after dropping (Needs to be determined through testing and metrics) the inactive mech will eject with a queue timer as punishment and a light or medium pilot will be brought in from the queue and dropped at the same drop point or near the mech closest to the drop zone. (Balance) (Gameplay) (Player Retention)

6. More useful mechs and mechpacks Add more mechs with unique and or “meta” playstyles similar to the Dragon-5N, Urbanmech, Viper, Spirit Bear, etc. Who wouldn't love piloting an Urbanmech IIC? Masc Atlas? High Mount King Crab? Dasher/fire moth? Quickdraw with insane arm articulation? Maybe a PGI Caanon Earthsiege/Starsiege mech? Just be careful not to create another Kodipocalypse. (Sustainability) (Player Retention) (Balance) (Competetive) (Gameplay)

7. Rezone/fix the default aiming sensitivity This should have been addressed years ago... new players are leaving after getting stomped continuously simply because they cannot aim properly with the sky high default sensitivity. (Gameplay) (Player Retention) (Sustainability) (Competetive)

8. The ability to browse the Mechlab/store/skill tree/etc. while in queue As it is right now waiting in the queue is a dead zone in the game with no content other than a spinny thing to experience. This is wasted time which is causing players to fall asleep or go afk while waiting. By changing the queue so that players can access the store, mechlab, skill tree, or to drop into a (enabled by default)free for all warm up and testing map (The MW4 Solaris arena). The player will be notified of an upcoming match with a 5 second timer and an audible warning that they are about to drop into a match before they are removed from the warm up arena. This will increase MWO's profitability as a share of time that was once spent doing nothing in the queue is spent in the store instead. (Sustainability) (Gameplay) (Player Retention)

Soon


1. Add previously promised features To many this game was supposed to be an improvement and straight upgrade from Mechwarrior 4, however you could imagine their surprise when they found that MWO was lacking most of the features that Mechwarrior 3 and Mechwarrior 4 had? I was one of the players that kept playing MW4 Mektek long after MWO was released because MWO felt like it was a downgrade that’s lacking features from the previous titles. (Gameplay) (Sustainability) (Player Retention)

• Inverse Kinematics, introduced in MW3 and was promised for MWO long ago.
• Rear View Camera (A quickdraw hero that can shoot backwards anyone?!) Introduced in MW2.
• Flood Lights a MW3 feature, will have a gameplay mechanic of blinding mechs that are using night vision and are facing you in close proximity.
• Adjustable radar ranges as well as radar modes, introduced in MW2
• More functional cockpit monitors. In the early designs for MWO the paper doll as well as the map were displayed on the cockpit monitors, though that seems to have fallen by the wayside.
• Crouching, moving forwards, backwards, jumping, or turning will break the crouch, introduced in MW3, can also be used as a counter for DFA.
• Targeting Allies, this will let you know their armor condition and if you should in the front of them or behind them. Has been in all non PGI Mechwarrior games since MW1
• Add more features, Mechwarrior is supposed to be a simulator and a sequel.
• [color=#CCCCCC]A tactical, 'Mech-based online shooter set in the rich BattleTech Universe.[/color]
• The complex(Tactical) nature of this FPS is what gives it its appeal so make it even more complicated(Tactical) to increase the depth of MWO's content and to make it even more appealing.

2. Unified Solaris 7 queue including a classic Solaris free for all mode (inb4 stealth armor hiding). Having too many queues is spreading the playerbase far too thin. Solaris 7 should instead be limited to a single queue with weekly divisions and Solaris match types with weekly leaderboards. Grudge Match options should also be added. (Gameplay) (Player Retention)

3. Model accurate barriers / fix the Invisible Walls in my opinion this is what hurts the competitive side of MWO the most. It literally requires players to memorize map glitches at the highest tiers of play to see which terrain you can see and or shoot through (in my experience). This issue most realistically can only be solved during the unreal engine port. (Gameplay) (Competitive) (Balance)

4. Fixing bad Spawns Bad spawns on many existing maps are causing stomps in solo QP and need to be redone. (Balance) (Gameplay)

5. Blind Drop / Procedurally Generated Map option Having an option for a procedurally generated map during voting will literally create an infinite amount of content for this game. If this is implemented correctly by utilizing MW5’s procedural map creation engine, then there will never be a feeling of stagnation as players have the opportunity to play on a completely new and unique maps via the map voting process. Most likely this feature will not happen until MWO is ported to the unreal engine. (Player Retention) (Gameplay) (Sustainability)

6. Moba game mode for Faction Play Does a Moba Incursion mode with ai vehicles, repair bays, and respawns tickle your fantasy? It almost feels like Incursion was meant to be played this way but was released half-way before it was finished. This mode will work, bases(3,600 Ton Union Dropships) will need to be armed and a lot more tanky and need at least 2 waves to take down. (Gameplay) (Sustainability)

Long Term


1. Fix all the bugs Dropships returning to drop off non existent mechs, clan hud, dropping outside of the map... and then warping back to the drop zone, falling endlessly and taking severe leg damage, game freezing for a sec right as you pull the trigger, invisible walls, ghost heat, missing mech panels, animation collisions and glitches, etc. (Gameplay) (Player Retention)

2. Engine Unreal Port As much as everyone wants to see this happen, the port will take a while to happen, and by that time MWO might be truly dead. But when it does, this is also the best opportunity to fix all the glaring issues with MWO such as the shading and invisible walls. (Player Retention) (Sustainability) (Gameplay) (Competitive) (Balance)

3. VR Support The track-IR head tracking code which is already present in MWO shouldn't be too far off from VR. If the TrackIR code is adapted to support VR headsets, MWO can compete with VOX Machinae, another Mechwarrior clone VR game that is leeching players from the Mechwarrior franchise. (Player Retention) (Sustainability) (Gameplay)

4. Death from Above Mechanic This feature has been talked to death, but I have new proposed solution. Simply put, if a heavier mech lands on top of you, you would suffer significant damage spread from the section that is hit as well as leg damage and a knockdown. Arm weapons can still be aimed accurately during the getup phase if the mech has the arm articulation for it. Not only would this make jump jets in heavies and assaults more viable as a competitive option, it’d also add another layer of strategy and importance on holding the high ground and understanding your mech and your opponent's mech. If crouching is implemented it can be used as a way to balance and counter to DFA by allowing mechs that fully crouch in time to resist or ignore the knockdown effect. (Gameplay) (Balance)

5. Cross Platform MWO on consoles sharing the same server as PC players would dramatically increase the playerbase and reduce the significant hardware pay wall of being a PC game. It would also seed the tiers and allow the matchmaker to work as intended. For consoles 3rd person view must feel arcadey/Mech Assault-like and be fully playable without convergence issues with a working map display. Additionally a mobile mechlab app "Mechwarrior Mobile" with integration and build exporting into MWO and some lightweight solaris 1v1 dueling minigame with leaderboard based on comparing mech stats with rng or something. There can be rewards between both games for accomplishing tasks in both games. (Sustainability) (Player Retention) (How Mechwarrior makes it to the next generation)

6. Command interface RTS Battletech / MWO integration What if the command interface doubled as a lightweight version of battletech? What if you could issue commands to individual mechs and the pilots could see pathing and indicators on the hud for the command you issued to them? What if unique mech icons were shown on the map instead of the little diamonds? MWO has a lot of potential in this regard. What if game plans could be drawn on the map before drops? (Gameplay) (Competetive)

7. Additional pilot animations and models, This game is a mech piloting simulator and needs to emphasize its immersion, if the pilot presses buttons to turn on the mechs, he should also be pushing additional buttons for the other functions such as the override, jump jets, masc, weapon bay doors, etc. (Player Retention)

8. More Ambient NPC units The majority of MWO's maps feel far too sterile. It’s almost as if nothing else happens in the game other than mechs duking it out. Where are the people, the vehicles, and the NPCs? Being able to see civilian or noncombatant vehicles fleeing the battlefield to a despawn point during the start of a drop would really breathe life into the game and hammer in how terrifying of a mobile war machine you are piloting. The Viridian Bog Lobsterpede does very well in this regard. (Player Retention)

9. Balancing I for one support ghost heat as well as the majority of current mech scaling and believe PGI has done a passable job with balancing; however if you balance a game based on metrics alone you must continually to do so otherwise weapons that were overbalanced such as the IS Large Pulse Laser are no longer competitive or useful. Instead it should be up to the players to find the meta for the game, not to capitulate to the requested meta as defined by the most vocal players. This is especially important because power creep is an important part of profitability. Just be sure that the skill to return ratio makes sense otherwise we will experience another lurmageddon. (Balance)

10. Cash shop HUD and audio customization options PGI could make a killing by selling customized hud options. How hasn’t this been capitalized on? Not only would this appeal to Mechwarrior players of all generations with retro HUD options, MWO could also appeal to other mech game players as well. (Gameplay) (Sustainability) (Player Retention)

PGI, please make this happen. Pushing out MWO2 with a hard reset will be the final blow that kills your golden goose.

Edited for clarity.

Edited by Buster Machine 0, 03 November 2020 - 05:20 AM.


#2 The pessimistic optimist

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 2,377 posts

Posted 21 October 2020 - 04:24 PM

Just want stuff to be useful and not be redundant am I an ******* for wanting stuff to be good and work?

Edited by SirSmokes, 21 October 2020 - 04:24 PM.


#3 The6thMessenger

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Nova Captain
  • Nova Captain
  • 8,104 posts
  • LocationFrom a distance in an Urbie with a HAG, delivering righteous fury to heretics.

Posted 21 October 2020 - 05:14 PM

Moba?

You want MWO to play like DOTA?

It could be done, but really? Really?

EDIT:

Also cross-platform might not work considering that playing mouse-keyboard is superior to controllers, and these people like their precision and accuracy. The only way to level that is autoaim, and trust me, they didn't like that -- I tried.

Edited by The6thMessenger, 21 October 2020 - 05:31 PM.


#4 Nightbird

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The God of Death
  • The God of Death
  • 7,518 posts

Posted 21 October 2020 - 05:20 PM

Yikes...

I don't know where to start...

#5 John Bronco

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Fighter
  • The Fighter
  • 966 posts

Posted 21 October 2020 - 05:29 PM

These are great suggestions!

lol

#6 Buster Machine 0

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • CS 2021 Bronze Champ
  • CS 2021 Bronze Champ
  • 224 posts
  • LocationRepping TharHes Industries on a laptop

Posted 21 October 2020 - 05:32 PM

View PostSirSmokes, on 21 October 2020 - 04:24 PM, said:

Just want stuff to be useful and not be redundant am I an ******* for wanting stuff to be good and work?


No, you just want to get what you paid for.

View PostThe6thMessenger, on 21 October 2020 - 05:14 PM, said:

Moba?

You want MWO to play like DOTA?

It can be done, but really? Really?

EDIT:
Also cross-platform might not work considering that playing mouse-keyboard is superior to controllers, and these people like their precision and accuracy. The only way to level that is autoaim, and trust me, they didn't like

View PostSirSmokes, on 21 October 2020 - 04:24 PM, said:

Just want stuff to be useful and not be redundant am I an ******* for wanting stuff to be good and work?


that -- I tried.


Yes, a dota-ish game mode with more than just turret NPCs would be lots of fun for faction play instead of the current wave up and push together mode.

With regards to cross platform, that's where the matchmaker and tier system comes into play no? There are many current players that would get much more even drops against console players. And yes, I agree 100% PC gaming is uncontested when it comes to the highest tier of performance and accuracy.

View PostNightbird, on 21 October 2020 - 05:20 PM, said:

Yikes...

I don't know where to start...


Yeah, MWO does have a lot of issues and this is a wall of text and my fair share of 2 cents.

#7 The6thMessenger

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Nova Captain
  • Nova Captain
  • 8,104 posts
  • LocationFrom a distance in an Urbie with a HAG, delivering righteous fury to heretics.

Posted 21 October 2020 - 05:35 PM

View PostBuster Machine 0, on 21 October 2020 - 05:32 PM, said:

Yes, a dota-ish game mode with more than just turret NPCs would be lots of fun for faction play instead of the current wave up and push together mode.


If there was respawns, and it plays like MW:LL, maybe. I honestly would like to see that.

But that doesn't seem like MWO. It's a massive departure from what we are doing. These people like their builds, I like our builds.

Edited by The6thMessenger, 21 October 2020 - 05:36 PM.


#8 Buster Machine 0

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • CS 2021 Bronze Champ
  • CS 2021 Bronze Champ
  • 224 posts
  • LocationRepping TharHes Industries on a laptop

Posted 21 October 2020 - 05:43 PM

View PostThe6thMessenger, on 21 October 2020 - 05:35 PM, said:


If there was respawns, and it plays like MW:LL, maybe. I honestly would like to see that.

But that doesn't seem like MWO. It's a massive departure from what we are doing. These people like their builds, I like our builds.


In my mind it's still the same FP drops with 4 mechs and your choice of dropdecks. With NPC minions like tanks and Vtols, damaged mechs could be covered enough to retreat back to the base and to the repair and rearm bay thus prolonging the fights and promoting efficient trades and staying alive. It's hard to say if it would really work without playtesting because a 12 man could easily ball up to overrun a single lane, but if a mechanic to discourage such pushes was implemented like dynamic minion spawn or something of the sort, the make the game mode might just work.

Alternatively you could have infinite respawns of any mech you have in your dropdeck, and the teams simply battle it out until one base is destroyed or the timer runs out.

Edited by Buster Machine 0, 21 October 2020 - 05:49 PM.


#9 The6thMessenger

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Nova Captain
  • Nova Captain
  • 8,104 posts
  • LocationFrom a distance in an Urbie with a HAG, delivering righteous fury to heretics.

Posted 21 October 2020 - 05:55 PM

View PostBuster Machine 0, on 21 October 2020 - 05:43 PM, said:

In my mind it's still the same FP drops with 4 mechs and your choice of dropdecks.


That won't play well with how MOBA does it. I get that this game will obviously have it's own spin to it, but padding the path with towers and marauding groups ain't going to be conducive to the life-time of the game if all you have is 4-Mech drops.

Destroying the ancient is important, but if you can just wipe out the opposition permanently off the map, then there isn't really any other way to play it other than just murder everyone 4 times, then push the towers, because they can't do anything about it. That is literally the problem of other game-modes aside from skirmish!

Infinite respawning is important because it keeps it about the objective, if you're not going to have that despite having a bit more complicated objective, then that defeats the point. Just give us Skirmish with dropdecks then.

If you also can't jungle, then you just stick in your respective lanes. Murderballing in a single lane is priority to quickly push, and there isn't any point in grinding for in-match currency because having a already-built mech means there isn't any other things left to do to make your mech powerful. Because they murderball, the enemy also murderballs, and the rest of the lanes are ignored, so what's the point of making this a MOBA again?

Wait, so a single-lane moba? How many players? Like 12v12, 8v8, 4v4? 1v1? I could see it being an interesting 1v1 to be honest. But Solaris didn't made the game more interesting, and that's a considerably high amount of investment.

Edited by The6thMessenger, 21 October 2020 - 06:17 PM.


#10 MW Waldorf Statler

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 9,459 posts
  • LocationGermany/Berlin

Posted 21 October 2020 - 11:53 PM

thats not the Ideas and Visions from the Devs for MWO

#11 Buster Machine 0

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • CS 2021 Bronze Champ
  • CS 2021 Bronze Champ
  • 224 posts
  • LocationRepping TharHes Industries on a laptop

Posted 22 October 2020 - 12:11 AM

View PostThe6thMessenger, on 21 October 2020 - 05:55 PM, said:


That won't play well with how MOBA does it. I get that this game will obviously have it's own spin to it, but padding the path with towers and marauding groups ain't going to be conducive to the life-time of the game if all you have is 4-Mech drops.

Destroying the ancient is important, but if you can just wipe out the opposition permanently off the map, then there isn't really any other way to play it other than just murder everyone 4 times, then push the towers, because they can't do anything about it. That is literally the problem of other game-modes aside from skirmish!

Infinite respawning is important because it keeps it about the objective, if you're not going to have that despite having a bit more complicated objective, then that defeats the point. Just give us Skirmish with dropdecks then.

If you also can't jungle, then you just stick in your respective lanes. Murderballing in a single lane is priority to quickly push, and there isn't any point in grinding for in-match currency because having a already-built mech means there isn't any other things left to do to make your mech powerful. Because they murderball, the enemy also murderballs, and the rest of the lanes are ignored, so what's the point of making this a MOBA again?

Wait, so a single-lane moba? How many players? Like 12v12, 8v8, 4v4? 1v1? I could see it being an interesting 1v1 to be honest. But Solaris didn't made the game more interesting, and that's a considerably high amount of investment.


Of course, it's not a straight moba and will have its own spin on it.

I'd imagine the match would have a theme of "Defend the Union Dropship" and collect the data(fuel canisters) before the timer runs out.

The setting would be something like a clan and an IS dropship battling it out at a the mouth of a volcano(spaceport) tryping to collect the data(fuel canisters) before a Volcanic explosion(Nuke) goes off.

You'd have two objectives.
1. Collect as much data for your team before the timer runs out
2. Ensure your Dropship survives

The Jungle is where you'll find the data as well as activatable uplinks, (reveal enemy positions) (ECM Coverage) (Long tom) (Mercenary reinforcements) (Air support etc.)

A Union class dropship is 3,600 tons and armed with
3 x PPCs
6 x AC/5s
6 x LRM-20s
12 x Medium Lasers
5 x Large Lasers

So yeah... that'd be very difficult to take out, plus it'd constantly be spawning minions (Tanks, Helicopters, Hovercraft.)

I could see a coordinated push team that tries to take out the Dropship in 2 or 3 waves and then proceed to lose on not collecting enough data.

It is definitely a doable mode, but making it fun, balanced, and difficult to cheese is going to be the real challenge.

#12 The6thMessenger

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Nova Captain
  • Nova Captain
  • 8,104 posts
  • LocationFrom a distance in an Urbie with a HAG, delivering righteous fury to heretics.

Posted 22 October 2020 - 12:43 AM

View PostBuster Machine 0, on 22 October 2020 - 12:11 AM, said:


Of course, it's not a straight moba and will have its own spin on it.

I'd imagine the match would have a theme of "Defend the Union Dropship" and collect the data(fuel canisters) before the timer runs out.

The setting would be something like a clan and an IS dropship battling it out at a the mouth of a volcano(spaceport) tryping to collect the data(fuel canisters) before a Volcanic explosion(Nuke) goes off.

You'd have two objectives.
1. Collect as much data for your team before the timer runs out
2. Ensure your Dropship survives

The Jungle is where you'll find the data as well as activatable uplinks, (reveal enemy positions) (ECM Coverage) (Long tom) (Mercenary reinforcements) (Air support etc.)

A Union class dropship is 3,600 tons and armed with
3 x PPCs
6 x AC/5s
6 x LRM-20s
12 x Medium Lasers
5 x Large Lasers

So yeah... that'd be very difficult to take out, plus it'd constantly be spawning minions (Tanks, Helicopters, Hovercraft.)

I could see a coordinated push team that tries to take out the Dropship in 2 or 3 waves and then proceed to lose on not collecting enough data.

It is definitely a doable mode, but making it fun, balanced, and difficult to cheese is going to be the real challenge.


So why does it need to be PVP then? Sounds like a blast, hell do that in MW5, seems interesting for a mission. But I don't think it'll click on MWO without complication.

Don't get me wrong, I would love to drop a dropship, dropping is in the god damn name. That was fun when I was driving off Clanners from the face of the jungle in MW4 via nuking their dropship. And took a Jade Falcon bondsman (woman actually).

But that doesn't sound like MOBA, that sounds like a different Incursion -- or granted, what incursion could have been but without the Tanks and Ships. And not everyone liked incursion.

Edited by The6thMessenger, 22 October 2020 - 12:44 AM.


#13 MW Waldorf Statler

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 9,459 posts
  • LocationGermany/Berlin

Posted 22 October 2020 - 02:21 AM

PvE Elements was a very Old Idea for MWO from the Start over the Years


startup Phase -Pve is on table for later
https://www.engadget...oZo2VOmrd5Qnhsd

2015 Coming in a Year?(and mean the Escort AI)
https://mwomercs.com...was-a-year-out/


https://mwomercs.com...-how-to-do-pve/


and now we have MW5 for PvE Elements

Edited by MW Waldorf Statler, 22 October 2020 - 02:21 AM.


#14 denAirwalkerrr

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The God of Death
  • The God of Death
  • 1,346 posts

Posted 22 October 2020 - 03:21 AM

I see you still can't get over the fact some people are better in game then you and hacusate with no proofs.

#15 Horseman

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Mercenary
  • The Mercenary
  • 4,738 posts
  • LocationPoland

Posted 22 October 2020 - 04:01 AM

View PostdenAirwalkerrr, on 22 October 2020 - 03:21 AM, said:

I see you still can't get over the fact some people are better in game then you and hacusate with no proofs.

No, he's saying many players don't know there is an anti-cheat and assume there's none, leading rise to hackusations over and over, and that a visible reminder of its' existence might go a long way to help with that.

#16 The6thMessenger

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Nova Captain
  • Nova Captain
  • 8,104 posts
  • LocationFrom a distance in an Urbie with a HAG, delivering righteous fury to heretics.

Posted 22 October 2020 - 04:08 AM

View PostHorseman, on 22 October 2020 - 04:01 AM, said:

No, he's saying many players don't know there is an anti-cheat and assume there's none, leading rise to hackusations over and over, and that a visible reminder of its' existence might go a long way to help with that.


I honestly didn't know that we had Anti-Cheat systems.

#17 denAirwalkerrr

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The God of Death
  • The God of Death
  • 1,346 posts

Posted 22 October 2020 - 04:08 AM

View PostHorseman, on 22 October 2020 - 04:01 AM, said:

No, he's saying many players don't know there is an anti-cheat and assume there's none, leading rise to hackusations over and over, and that a visible reminder of its' existence might go a long way to help with that.


What are you smoking I want it. There is no anti cheat.

#18 My Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Major General
  • Major General
  • 475 posts

Posted 22 October 2020 - 04:13 AM

Quote

1. Offer a rewards between MWO and MW5

While I personally think its a neat idea, it won't actually do anything for the players.

Quote



2. More tiers of starter packs on both the steam and epic store

No problem here, more and better priced packs would do a lot to help gain revenue.

Quote

3. Platform Diversification

I imagine because its already on Steam that EGS would kick up a fuss if they added MWO to it, and MW5 is coming out later this year for other planets.

Quote



Additionally, a mobile mechlab app with 3d models, build exporting, and mech emote/pose options would really turn this game into an obsession.

https://mech.nav-alpha.com/

Quote

4. Conspicuous presence of MWO’s anti-cheat

Even in games with visible anti-cheat you still see rampant hackusations.

Quote



5. Opt in AFK and DC light or medium backfill mechanic

This is just straight up a bad idea. For one it seeks to put a bandaid on the actual issue of the game's stability, but who would be pulled in for these matches?Plus the whole issue of the amount of dev time this would take, time that could just be spent fixing the issue of crashes or server disconnects.

Quote

6. More useful mechs and mechpacks

I doubt we'll ever see new mechs being added to MWO again, I even doubt new variants to be honest. The dev time spent balancing new content like this would be better spent rebalancing the exist mechs so more can become viable.

Quote



7. Rezone/fix the default aiming sensitivity

If someone can't go "huh, kind of high sensitivity" and change it themselves, well. Its on them.

Soon



Quote

1. Unified Solaris 7 queue

Solaris was a failed experiment, putting more time into something that so few people regularly play would not result in a return on the investment.

Quote

2. Model accurate barriers / fix the Invisible Walls

While I highly doubt PGI can fix this either due to manpower required or a lack of skill, it would be a welcome change. Though seeing how MW5 also has similar issues, I think its a lack of skill and less engine related.


Quote

3. Fixing bad Spawns

No problem here, its a reasonable suggestion. At the very least moving the groups out of alpha lance would be a good start.

Quote

4. Blind Drop / Procedurally Generated Map option

MW5's maps are blant and boring and they suit well for a PvE game where the map can take a backseat, in PvP the map design is on the same level of importance as weapon balance. Procedural generation would not suit MWO and would be a gross waste of resources.

Quote

5. Moba game mode for Faction Play

Of all the suggestions for FP this has to be one of the dumbest, why do people keep banging on about muh AI muh PvE in a competitive shooter? If I wanted this I could go play the new MW5 DLC when it comes out.

Quote

6. Add previously promised features


• Inverse Kinematics, has been in Mechwarrior games since MW3 and was promised for MWO long ago

If its as simple as them just reactivating it in the files with a bit of tweaking with no performance hit? Sure, why not. Otherwise its pointless graphics.

Quote

• Rear View Camera (A quickdraw hero that can shoot backwards anyone?!) A feature that was added in MW2

The only time you'd need to use a rear view camera would be if you're in one of the big, slow assaults and want to avoid getting caught on stuff. Otherwise a pointless waste of manpower.

Quote

• Flood Lights a MW3 feature

Why?

Quote

• Adjustable radar ranges as well as radar modes a MW2 feature

What does this mean?

Quote

• More functional cockpit monitors. In the early designs for MWO the paper doll as well as the map were displayed on the cockpit monitors, though that seems to have fallen by the wayside.

Like Inverse Kinematics I'm all for them being an option.

Quote

• Add more features, Mechwarrior is supposed to be a simulator.



Posted Image


Quote

1. Engine Unreal Port

I doubt an engine port is on PGI's list of priorities, keeping MWO alive and kicking is going to prove to be a much better investment then making MWO 2.0 off the back of MW5.

Quote

2. VR Support

Not worth the manpower

Quote

3. Death from Above Mechanic

No melee

Quote

4. Cross Platform MWO

I don't think this would even be on PGI's list of priorities, a MW5 port sure. But MWO? No.

Quote

5. Command interface RTS Battletech / MWO integration

Why? Whats the point of this increased complexity, what would it achieve? Why piss away manpower making more command icons when people at best only use two and even then, how often do you see people putting down the commands?

Quote

6. Additional pilot animations,

Posted Image

Quote

7. Ambient NPC units

Why would there be in a competitive PvP shooter?

Quote

8. Balancing

I don't trust your opinions on balancing, but this would be an urgent issue.

Quote



9. Cash shop HUD and audio customization options

If possible and doesn't take too much effort, not a bad way to monetise.

Quote

10. Fix all the bugs

We all want bugs to be fixed but temper your expectations. The core code is basically lostech now, I fully expect PGI to not be able to fix a lot of stuff because they just don't have the knowhow.

#19 Bud Crue

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Rage
  • Rage
  • 9,953 posts
  • LocationOn the farm in central Minnesota

Posted 22 October 2020 - 04:24 AM

Started writing a section by section response to each of your proposals, and then just said "screw it". Long story made short: only item 2 of your "urgent" items, would appear to be within the realm of things PGI could/would be capable of instituting. The rest are either impossible, impractical, ill advised, or contrary to PGI's goals.

But I gotta give props to "fix all bugs" item at the end. Made me lol.

#20 S t P a u l y

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 93 posts

Posted 22 October 2020 - 04:49 AM

thanks for adding to the unbearable noise





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users