Truly Baffled
#1
Posted 04 November 2022 - 01:51 PM
He stated he was not going to win the Hit Box battle. I am trying to understand why he thought he was going to win this fight at all. Or against any knife fighter. Is the opinion out there that all lights should die when we are looked at? (Never Mind I know the answer to that one) .
I dunno just curious is all. Vid below with details hidden.
#2
Posted 04 November 2022 - 04:08 PM
you cant win with er lasers
played with er lasers ferret lately, wasnt able even leg that little monster
Edited by Saved By The Bell, 04 November 2022 - 04:08 PM.
#3
Posted 04 November 2022 - 07:12 PM
#4
Posted 04 November 2022 - 10:32 PM
Darian DelFord, on 04 November 2022 - 01:51 PM, said:
He stated he was not going to win the Hit Box battle. I am trying to understand why he thought he was going to win this fight at all. Or against any knife fighter. Is the opinion out there that all lights should die when we are looked at? (Never Mind I know the answer to that one) .
I dunno just curious is all. Vid below with details hidden.
1) Sorry, it was the Shadow Cat, not the Shadow Hawk.
2) I see no big mystery here. He just hoped to slip behind your team with ECM and snipe from the backfield. Unfortunately for him, you were lucky to notice him and he realized that with his build he will probably lose this fight.
This is no different from running a light 'Mech and meeting - and killing - enemy would-be sniper camping with Stealth armor somewehere, where he expected to have a perfect sniper nest. Or coming across enemy Lurmboat when you are running a brawling build.
Just a case of enemy tactics that did not work as the enemy players hoped.
#5
Posted 05 November 2022 - 01:51 AM
But that fight was pure rock, paper, scissors fight... shadowcat with that loadout had zero chances to win that duel, without using terrain to his advantage aka disengaging, even then pretty slim chance.
#7
Posted 06 November 2022 - 08:41 PM
Lockheed_, on 05 November 2022 - 02:20 AM, said:
are you gonna start a new thread with video evidence every time you run into an idiot?
Gagis, on 05 November 2022 - 02:21 AM, said:
Please spare us.
Honestly I do it to show that just because someone does something impossible, it does not mean they were cheating or exploiting. I can not tell you how many times I have been one shot and no clue where or how it happened when I was in cover.
Perhaps through these types of vids, folks can see the other side and go "hmmm ok not an exploit."
#8
Posted 07 November 2022 - 12:46 PM
#9
Posted 07 November 2022 - 12:49 PM
#10
Posted 07 November 2022 - 01:12 PM
first off... as a LCt pilot.. this is literally what i do every single match.. Its part of the build..
I run around the whole map.. kill a few of your assaults then I vanish...
Its not my problem you guys dont know how the game works...
just do the math.. If i can do 1000 damage in a 19.9 ton mech with only 4 small pulse lasers....
what is your excuse?
#11
Posted 07 November 2022 - 01:40 PM
#12
Posted 07 November 2022 - 03:15 PM
THE BIG question IS, at state of mind, if some ask you to join a SEAL team, 4 man death LANCE, do have the mechs ??, have learn the TACTICS, HAVE you learned team work, odds are NO you are not ready.
SAWK CLANNER
#14
Posted 08 November 2022 - 07:42 AM
Sawk, on 07 November 2022 - 03:15 PM, said:
Not sure how you fit two erppcs (there are enough tonnage to just those two if you strip almost half of your max armor) med lazors and many guns.
Sawk, on 07 November 2022 - 03:15 PM, said:
SAWK CLANNER
Eez.
#15
Posted 08 November 2022 - 09:59 AM
Curccu, on 08 November 2022 - 07:42 AM, said:
I guess that Sawk meant that has two Viper 'Mechs - one is a sniper with a pair of ER PPCs and the other one is a brawler with lasers and MGs.
#16
Posted 08 November 2022 - 10:18 AM
martian, on 08 November 2022 - 09:59 AM, said:
Might be but I'm still wondering dual ERPPC build even without anything else... that must be paper --> vpr-b
#17
Posted 08 November 2022 - 10:23 AM
Curccu, on 08 November 2022 - 10:18 AM, said:
If such 'Mech suits him ...
If the game client lets him drop in the game, then it is a valid loadout for the gameplay purposes.
#18
Posted 08 November 2022 - 10:29 AM
martian, on 08 November 2022 - 10:23 AM, said:
According to one friend of mine who had habit of dropping extremely silly builds like MG direwolf, it is not always ok to drop into game with something that game allows.... He got temporary ban for it.
#19
Posted 08 November 2022 - 10:35 AM
Curccu, on 08 November 2022 - 10:29 AM, said:
Well, sometimes it is hard to say if somebody deploys in a funny build because he wants to have a silly fun, or because he thinks that his loadout really works.
#20
Posted 08 November 2022 - 05:02 PM
SAWK
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users