As it is looking like you're deliberately trolling (and not even particularily smart), I'll make this my last reply to you and instead go with reporting.
Dlardrageth, on 03 January 2012 - 10:29 PM, said:
[...]For all we know it could as well be a "negligable minority" or whatever. At least I only stated I was personally not interested, didn't start making random stuff up.
[...]
SilentWolff, on 03 January 2012 - 11:05 PM, said:
[...]First, wheres your proof your not the minority and what does that matter?[...]
Fail at reading comprehension much? That is, assuming, you read before replying... I
never claimed I'm certainly not part of the minority,
I stated that we cannot know, duh!
And it mattering is a simple matter of very basic economics for PGI. If they were to cater to every single random muppet's whim, be it a special duel mode, fancy lingerie for Mechs, the integration of real-time viewing capability by iPod and what not, they'd never get anything done. They have to prioritize what to finish with limited resources in a given amount of time. Thus they will proceed somewhat market-orientated and look at what many people want, not only a handful. Pretty obvious actually.
Quote
As I said, every MW has had a duel system. You talk about me saying "random stuff", how bout you bringing up MW1, which had NO multiplayer at all. When referring to every MW game, I am OBVIOUSLY referring to MULIPLAYER. MW1 didnt have multiplayer so your point is , well pointless.
Yes, exactly, my car has A/C and your car probably hasn't, so the claim that all cars have A/C stands, because your car is irrelevant to the claim?
I think you rather
obviously either don't know what you are talking about or should perhaps think first before writing. First claiming all MW games had a "duel mode" (which didn't exist as a seperate mode at all, thus WRONG the first time) and then stating that of course you didn't include this and that in the "all MW games" because it doesn't suit your argument any more?
And yes, MW1 is totally pointless when talking about "all MW games", right... Of course, you could simply get your
facts straight instead, but hey, never let
facts come in the way of a good trolling attempt, right?
Quote
And you want to talk to me about not knowing MW and you dont even know that simple fact?
Yes, indeed, not like it was
me pointing out the first of your "all MW games" didn't even have a multiplayer option.
I am somewhat surprised after this now you even
know a MW1
existed...
Quote
And no one said it had to be a different mode. All they need to do is give the ability to set up matches with the amount of people per match, just like they have done with MW3 and 4 So I'm afraid your logic escapes me here.
You did. Is your attention span that low that you cannot remember what you yourself wrote any more? You did repeatedly refer to the "duel mode", whatever brainchild of your fantasy that might be. Let me help you with that issue below. And just for the record, "they" don't
need to give you anything. You can ask nicely... or try the trolling approach like this one, but that's about it.
SilentWolff, on 03 January 2012 - 09:57 PM, said:
Just because YOU dont want a duel mode, because YOU think its boring or uninteresting, doesnt make it a small majority of players that do want it.
EVERY MW game has had a duel mode. EVERY one.[...]
See,
you referred to a "duel mode", not something like "training battle", or anything else. But I guess if you write "duel mode" you mean something completely different, just like "all MW games" in
your private version of english means "all MW games except the ones I don't care/know about", right?
Quote
BTW when people throw out the troll arguement in their counter point, it usually means they have no point and are out of constructive things to say.
Small logical fallacy of yours here, you had
no point to begin with.
You are just trying to make one up as you go by the looks of it.
EoD for me, not gonna waste more time on you.
Edited by Dlardrageth, 04 January 2012 - 12:07 AM.