Mwo Annual Rewards Program 2025 Updated!
#21
Posted 17 September 2025 - 08:09 AM
#22
Posted 17 September 2025 - 08:14 AM
LordNothing, on 17 September 2025 - 07:34 AM, said:
No.
The game does not need any more ap or mag spam, it's terrible game play, lazy design, and no where near canon.
All AP and Mag should be limited to fire 5 simultaneously at most, their range halved, and zero specific buffs to them for the next year.
The Adder, flea, and other AP & Mag boaters are incredibly bad for game play and the laziest and most self-serving design choice to roll out of the Cauldron's self-dealing corruption show the last two years.
#23
Posted 17 September 2025 - 08:17 AM
(Noted that buying vanilla MC would award you with Light/Medium Loyalty Mechs).
On the other hand, you can get two Warthog ADR-W(L) mechs this way! XD
https://mwomercs.com/profile/content
- - - - - - - - - -
2024: I've gotton 2x ADR-W(L) mechs
2025: I can get another 2x ADR-W(L) mechs as per Sept 18th info.
==>That's 4x ADR-W(L) mechs!
(Now, if only I can get a full roster of 4x UM-IIC-M(TSP), all four of them!
Edited by w0qj, 17 September 2025 - 08:18 AM.
#24
Posted 17 September 2025 - 08:18 AM
Hawk819, on 17 September 2025 - 08:09 AM, said:
Don't count on it. Last year's nova cat had it's ECM removed by the Cauldron and Tiyos, Tiyos' explanation being they worried about giving ECM to a mech with 8 ballistic Hardpoints... which was hilarious because this happened while they were launching an ECM with 10 ballistic hardpoints at the same time, the Bane.
My point being lore, wisdom, balance, none of that matters to PGI's guys or the Cauldron goons who only want to warp the game to their game-play style without any interference, they will rip stuff out and ignore core aspect of a mech to suit their bias or to make sure it doesn't compete with a new mech launch.
Edited by Mayhem Lewis, 17 September 2025 - 08:19 AM.
#25
Posted 17 September 2025 - 08:49 AM
Nah screw that, go all in on the theoretical Magshot Munin. You can barely fit em in as is with IS XL, Endo, and Ferro.
#26
Posted 17 September 2025 - 09:29 AM
Mayhem Lewis, on 17 September 2025 - 08:18 AM, said:
Don't count on it. Last year's nova cat had it's ECM removed by the Cauldron and Tiyos, Tiyos' explanation being they worried about giving ECM to a mech with 8 ballistic Hardpoints... which was hilarious because this happened while they were launching an ECM with 10 ballistic hardpoints at the same time, the Bane.
My point being lore, wisdom, balance, none of that matters to PGI's guys or the Cauldron goons who only want to warp the game to their game-play style without any interference, they will rip stuff out and ignore core aspect of a mech to suit their bias or to make sure it doesn't compete with a new mech launch.
That's what I'm afraid of.
#27
Posted 17 September 2025 - 09:29 AM
Pelmeshek, on 17 September 2025 - 06:24 AM, said:
Honestly, not a bad lineup for this year. Can think of plenty of builds for a BLR with shoulder mounted ballistics, a 75 tone stalker should slot in nicely with the Marauder and Orion if they don't screw up the survivabilty, more hard points for the Huntsman, I only worry about the Raven MN (Muninn name makes sense) because I struggle with the Huginn.
#28
Posted 17 September 2025 - 10:50 AM
Mayhem Lewis, on 17 September 2025 - 08:14 AM, said:
No.
The game does not need any more ap or mag spam, it's terrible game play, lazy design, and no where near canon.
All AP and Mag should be limited to fire 5 simultaneously at most, their range halved, and zero specific buffs to them for the next year.
The Adder, flea, and other AP & Mag boaters are incredibly bad for game play and the laziest and most self-serving design choice to roll out of the Cauldron's self-dealing corruption show the last two years.
if were being honest, apgauss spam isnt really that much damage. viper is too fragile, adder too slow, piranhas dont have enough ammo. so its not really as strong as it looks on paper.
#29
Posted 17 September 2025 - 11:26 AM
#30
Posted 17 September 2025 - 11:29 AM
#31
Posted 17 September 2025 - 11:32 AM
1. Yes, the Huntsman has ECM in the leg as per lore. No this does not mean we're about to get leg weapons. ECM has always been possible. Weapons haven't and won't be.
2. The Raven is based off of the -SS variant (look in Sarna for what it is) that was renamed to the Munin/MN for reasons that should be obvious. Deal with it.
#32
Posted 17 September 2025 - 11:34 AM
Edited by Steel Raven, 17 September 2025 - 03:35 PM.
#33
Posted 17 September 2025 - 11:41 AM
BlueDevilspawn, on 17 September 2025 - 11:32 AM, said:
2. The Raven is based off of the -SS variant (look in Sarna for what it is) that was renamed to the Munin/MN for reasons that should be obvious. Deal with it.
So you are telling me I get a Raven with ECM and 6 Laser slots? Hyper Hyper Christmas is earlie this year
#34
Posted 17 September 2025 - 12:00 PM
The 75t Stalker being decent depends on how much quirk it gets for losing the tonnage (and a missile hardpoint) I guess. I'd imagine it gets at least some heat quirk.
And the PPC+LRM TBR I doubt will actually be used that way over the usual ECM mixpod builds too, also would need as much So8 quirks as the TBR-Prime (which also can already run its loadout albeit with slightly different[worse] weapon placement) to at least be decent.
The ECM Huntsman is eh, kind of whatever that will just be run with 2HLL+a bunch of ERMLs or whatever like PPC poptart. Nothing really new.
Croaker Munin, on 17 September 2025 - 11:41 AM, said:
Weird way to spell out, "I'm okay with older stuff like Wolfhound-Grinner (that is already rarely ever seen) getting powercreeped!
Edited by Ttly, 17 September 2025 - 12:33 PM.
#35
Posted 17 September 2025 - 12:55 PM
BlueDevilspawn, on 17 September 2025 - 11:32 AM, said:
1. Yes, the Huntsman has ECM in the leg as per lore. No this does not mean we're about to get leg weapons. ECM has always been possible. Weapons haven't and won't be.
2. The Raven is based off of the -SS variant (look in Sarna for what it is) that was renamed to the Munin/MN for reasons that should be obvious. Deal with it.
Yes. So everything is where it's suppose to be?
Edited by Hawk819, 17 September 2025 - 12:56 PM.
#36
Posted 17 September 2025 - 03:10 PM
#37
Posted 17 September 2025 - 03:25 PM
Ttly, on 17 September 2025 - 12:00 PM, said:
Weird way to spell out, "I'm okay with older stuff like Wolfhound-Grinner (that is already rarely ever seen) getting powercreeped!
It's still a Raven with Raven hit boxes and armor. It's not a Grinner but it is a better Raven.
#39
Posted 17 September 2025 - 05:31 PM
BlueDevilspawn, on 17 September 2025 - 11:32 AM, said:
LOL. They didn't change "Grand Dragon." Glad they figured this out.
#40
Posted 17 September 2025 - 06:14 PM
4 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users


























