Feedback On Inc-Zero
#1
Posted 09 December 2025 - 04:54 PM
But I felt this needed to be shared urgently, so I'm creating this topic even though I'm still in the middle of it.
My impressions INC-ZERO
positive:
・ClanMeck's first hovering & shielded MECH
It possesses the same specialized JJ as Specter and APACHE, and the same shield as ONYX and RED REAPER.
・Heavy Laser-Specialized Quirks
As a heavy laser enthusiast, this LEGEND seemed pretty much a must-have.
There's also a rumor it's Wing Gundam-themed, which is pretty exciting!
negative:
・It's just weak.
Honestly, it feels weak enough to be my personal worst Legendary MECH right now.
1. Heat control is only HEAT-10%, making it prone to overheating.
2. Like the Panther, weapons are concentrated on the right arm, making it easy to disable.
3. It's a hovering MECH but lacks ECM.
4. It lacks fall damage reduction to support its hovering.
5. The shield feels pointless. I want to remove it and install a bigger engine.
6. The weight of the shield and hover jets is cumbersome.
7. This is just my impression, so it's not precise... but it feels like it has the same performance as the JJ from APACHE or Spectre.
・No Warhorn!!!
Looks like I couldn't make it. So I can get one past favorite item, but...
Honestly, if I'd known this beforehand, I wouldn't have bought it.
What I want:
・I want the Heat Dissipation and Fall Damage Quirks.
These two are absolutely essential.
If possible, I'd also like the Energy Heat buff.
・Warhorn Implementation
It's unthinkable that a Legendary Mech doesn't have its own dedicated warhorn.
・Quirks as ECM alternatives
Like RADAR DEPRIVATION... TOP SPEED...
INC-ZERO feels like a huge disappointment, packed with so many elements.
Maybe they intended to implement Incubus II this way...
But it's truly disappointing. I hope my opinion changes by the time I finish the Battle Pass.
#2
Posted 09 December 2025 - 05:01 PM
A bit lazy on the part of PGI if you ask me, unless it was a mistake.
Good hunting,
CFC Conky
#3
Posted 09 December 2025 - 05:07 PM
CFC Conky, on 09 December 2025 - 05:01 PM, said:
A bit lazy on the part of PGI if you ask me, unless it was a mistake.
Good hunting,
CFC Conky
No, you can choose one legendary MECH warhorn from the past to get.
I'll take the Seraph warhorn.
#4
Posted 09 December 2025 - 05:55 PM
The robit itself is kinna terrible? And not in the "this is a really fun new playstyle that is just inconsistent!" sort of terrible, but in the "this is trying to be three or four different pre-existing playstyles at once and it's really bad at all of them!" playstyle. Gundam cosplay aside, this sucker did not need both a shield and a partial wing. Especially since its shield is almost purely cosmetic, with that shape...
Edited by 1453 R, 09 December 2025 - 05:55 PM.
#5
Posted 09 December 2025 - 06:16 PM
#6
Posted 09 December 2025 - 07:41 PM
#7
Posted 09 December 2025 - 07:42 PM
Edited by VeeOt Dragon, 09 December 2025 - 07:44 PM.
#8
Posted Yesterday, 08:11 AM
I feel like if this is actually trying to do Gundam Main character nonsense, the Partial wings should come with at LEAST Spider Level jumping capability.
Or, give us what we've been asking for, and turn them into horizontal jets instead. Ground-MASC but with heat instead of leg breaking.
#9
Posted Yesterday, 04:13 PM
Edited by Rabid Imp, Yesterday, 04:15 PM.
#10
Posted Yesterday, 09:09 PM
Using as a non ECM scout and a harasser. Also fun to YOLO fly over the enemy team like a CBill pinata when losing a game big.
4/10
#11
Posted Today, 03:40 AM
#12
Posted Today, 05:47 AM
Like I said the other day, "actually using the shield" is really just being nice and letting the other team farm you.
That, and it's on a proper light so you probably screwed up your position/agro that you're getting shot at in the first place.
Not to mention it doesn't really cover the legs either.
Also someone forgot to give them fall damage quirks.
The HML JennerIIC is actually pretty good thanks to its vertical mobility, but this thing without them is pretty meh.
Edited by Ttly, Today, 08:02 AM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users



























