Honor Among Thieves (Signup)
#561
Posted 07 August 2012 - 08:38 AM
#562
Posted 07 August 2012 - 08:41 AM
Sparks Murphey, on 07 August 2012 - 02:56 AM, said:
"Wait! You can't murder orphans!!!!"
"Why not?"
"Because they are orphans for God's sake!"
"Faces are faces..."
Barret Sender and Hanyit Greyhame. They were meant for each other. Like matter and antimatter.
I like this.... Going to be fun. I will write my intro post as soon as I work my way through the five pages already written...
Also, forgot to mention, Hanyit gambled AND drank his money away..... Drunk pilotting is always the best, right?
#563
Posted 07 August 2012 - 11:54 AM
This is going to hurt
#564
Posted 07 August 2012 - 11:59 AM
RogueSpear, on 07 August 2012 - 08:38 AM, said:
Punching a small hole in someones windshield is much less damaging than blowing the cockpit to molten bits of slag. So no I did not.
#565
Posted 07 August 2012 - 12:40 PM
#566
Posted 07 August 2012 - 12:46 PM
#567
Posted 07 August 2012 - 02:16 PM
And fyi, there is no such thing as bullet 'proof' glass, just bullet resistant.
#568
Posted 07 August 2012 - 02:19 PM
#569
Posted 07 August 2012 - 02:42 PM
The Outlaw Kazzen, on 07 August 2012 - 02:16 PM, said:
They can't, anti-tank rifles that could actually penetrate anything other than the lightest armor went out of fashion in the early years of WWII. Even in the 1930s such rifles were proven rather useless, which is why they were replaced with recoil-less rifles and other anti tank weapons such as the Bazooka/Panzerschreck/Panzarfaust/etc.
Anti-material rifles can penetrate some armor but certainly not the armor of any sort of modern tank. Some of these rifles are used as sniper rifles but there are no sniper rifles intended to combat tanks.
Edited by Vodkavaiator, 07 August 2012 - 02:48 PM.
#570
Posted 07 August 2012 - 02:53 PM
#571
Posted 07 August 2012 - 02:54 PM
Antimaterial rifles like the Barrett can punch holes in the sides of LAVs like the Bradley, but wouldn't even scratch an M1 Abrams. The reason the Barrett can punch though a Light Armoured Vehicle is the armour on a LAV is designed to defeat small arms. So just about proof against the average .50 - the Barrett uses Armour Piercing Fin Stabilized Discarding Sabot rounds of .50 calibre, at a very high velocity. So it'd hull a LAV.
Mech cockpits are designed to be proof against anything short of an AC20 - even an AC10 won't take out a cockpit outright. A sniper rifle going through it is therefore a little ridiculous - even the personal gauss rifles of the Jihad couldn't hull a mech cockpit (I believe)!
Still, nothing wrong with having an antimaterial rifle for knocking out infantry behind walls or similar to support the TBQ's Poor Bloody Infantry.
#572
Posted 07 August 2012 - 03:14 PM
#573
Posted 07 August 2012 - 03:19 PM
We're using Redhawks. 2 MGs, a medium laser and an LRM5. Plus the infantry/cargo bay.
#574
Posted 07 August 2012 - 03:31 PM
#576
Posted 07 August 2012 - 04:22 PM
#577
Posted 07 August 2012 - 04:24 PM
Forget I posted?
That was easy.
Anywho, i'm ready to get things started. Rifle or no, I'm still itching to get this over with hehe
#578
Posted 07 August 2012 - 05:08 PM
Just don't go dropping mechs with it
#579
Posted 07 August 2012 - 06:27 PM
#580
Posted 07 August 2012 - 06:51 PM
5 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 5 guests, 0 anonymous users