#7185
Posted 09 September 2016 - 05:57 AM
#7186
Posted 10 September 2016 - 03:05 AM
Pariah Devalis, on 08 September 2016 - 10:45 AM, said:
Edit: Jesus, Juodas. That was fast!
sounds interesting, i will give it a try
Trashy, but fast edit (hind legs to big, bad fixed upper front leg, etc.) . I normaly dont like Quads but this one looks pretty cool. Does anyone knows how i can edit multiple layers at once? then i could make a repaintable version from Odanans Template.
EDIT: LOL, i just looked up the barghest on Sarna:
HOW is this based of a Bushwacker??? LOL
This Mech looks like a 200tonner using a naval Class 20 AC and 2 Naval PPCs xD
Edited by N F X, 10 September 2016 - 03:43 AM.
#7187
Posted 10 September 2016 - 06:47 AM
#7188
Posted 10 September 2016 - 06:57 AM
N F X, on 10 September 2016 - 03:05 AM, said:
Trashy, but fast edit (hind legs to big, bad fixed upper front leg, etc.) . I normaly dont like Quads but this one looks pretty cool. Does anyone knows how i can edit multiple layers at once? then i could make a repaintable version from Odanans Template.
EDIT: LOL, i just looked up the barghest on Sarna:
HOW is this based of a Bushwacker??? LOL
This Mech looks like a 200tonner using a naval Class 20 AC and 2 Naval PPCs xD
Sweet! Though as you discovered the arms don't exist in quad designs.
As to how is it based off a wacker?
Just the cockpit and torso assembly of this art puts it pretty close. Even though BT has notoriously inconsistent art. I mean, there are at least 3 designs in BT alone of the Bushwacker.
#7190
Posted 10 September 2016 - 08:59 AM
Pariah Devalis, on 10 September 2016 - 06:57 AM, said:
Sweet! Though as you discovered the arms don't exist in quad designs.
As to how is it based off a wacker?
Just the cockpit and torso assembly of this art puts it pretty close. Even though BT has notoriously inconsistent art. I mean, there are at least 3 designs in BT alone of the Bushwacker.
Oh, so THIS is the "edit" you were talking about in the match, hahaha
#7191
Posted 10 September 2016 - 09:07 AM
#7194
Posted 11 September 2016 - 10:17 AM
N F X, on 10 September 2016 - 03:05 AM, said:
HOW is this based of a Bushwacker??? LOL
This Mech looks like a 200tonner using a naval Class 20 AC and 2 Naval PPCs xD
Some of the wost writing and art for a TRO IMO. It was made when the FASA art director went crazy with oversize gun bores.
The mech it self is suppose to have a thin profile for a heavy like the Bushwacker but it doest match the art and mini doesn't even try to match it.
#7195
Posted 12 September 2016 - 02:27 PM
Based on this old box:
Edited by Justin Kase, 12 September 2016 - 04:57 PM.
#7197
Posted 14 September 2016 - 07:09 AM
Max OConnor, on 10 September 2016 - 06:47 AM, said:
That paintjob looks like it'd fit in with the weird and wacky paintjobs of Camacho's Caballeros (seriously, I seem to remember one of their pilots' mechs being describes as having been covered in dolls' heads or something like that). I like it.
#7199
Posted 14 September 2016 - 11:14 PM
That is just sexy.
#7201
Posted 15 September 2016 - 06:24 AM
#7203
Posted 15 September 2016 - 05:33 PM
Jacon Ceronia, on 14 September 2016 - 05:44 PM, said:
That is damned sexy looking
If inspiration strikes, feel free to beautify the Stinger I was working on
Note - originally, I had a smaller head - but then the cockpit would have been ridiculously tight for a mech warrior to fit in there. Hence the bigger head. I'd also thought about increasing the size of the underslung MGs. Below is a rough guesstimate of the size.
Edited by Justin Kase, 15 September 2016 - 05:42 PM.
#7204
Posted 16 September 2016 - 11:48 AM
Justin Kase, on 15 September 2016 - 05:33 PM, said:
Well, the Stinger was actually _noted_ for having a ridiculously cramped cockpit. So cramped, in fact, that some bigger mechwarriors might have trouble fitting into it, or might not even be able to fit in there at all, so that would actually be all according to lore.
I love the look of it, by the way.
12 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 12 guests, 0 anonymous users