87 replies to this topic

[CobraFive]

I voted "yes" because there wasn't an option for "super yes".

My biggest worry is they'll let some of the more hardcore sim options get in the way of having fun, but I haven't really seen or heard anything form the devs to imply that its going to happen.

[whiskey tango foxtrot]

Aegis Kleais™, on 09 February 2012 - 08:06 AM, said:

I voted 'No'.

I Love Where MWO is going.

The only thing questionable about the whole MWO is this Paul character. So far, what he brings to the table is akin to a STD you might get from an encounter with a "Lady of the Night".

Everyone else, they're tops in my book.

LOL...........no..........LMAO

[Chuckie]

Aegis Kleais™, on 09 February 2012 - 08:06 AM, said:

I voted 'No'.

I Love Where MWO is going.

Hmm... you seem to have a problem with context at times..

Because by voting NO that could makes someone think, that someone must have a mental issue and think something is wrong with the way its going... and since its 50 to your 1 vote.. we know that can't be true.

But since it was you that voted no.. I guess they would be right (about the mental issue thing.. anyway )

Edited by Chuckie, 09 February 2012 - 08:41 AM.

[Chuckie]

whiskey tango foxtrot, on 09 February 2012 - 08:29 AM, said:

" I won't be wronged,Iwon't be isulted,and I won't be laid a hand on. I don't do these things to other people and I expect the same from them. "

But will you be spell and grammar checked

I won't be wronged, I won't be insulted, and I won't be laid a hand on. I don't do these things to other people and I expect the same from them.

Edited by Chuckie, 09 February 2012 - 08:40 AM.

[whiskey tango foxtrot]

People have been trying to teach me to type for a long time..........hasn't worked

[Aegis Kleais]

Chuckie, on 09 February 2012 - 08:37 AM, said:

Hmm... you seem to have a problem with context at times..

Because by voting NO that could makes someone think, that someone must have a mental issue and think something is wrong with the way its going... and since its 50 to your 1 vote.. we know that can't be true.

But since it was you that voted no.. I guess they would be right (about the mental issue thing.. anyway )

Um...er....eh...... TRUE!

[Tannhauser Gate]

If the game lives up to very detailed hype then yes Im majorly stoked and I havent been this excited about a game.. ever.

The only thing that gives me any sense of apprehension is the f2p model. Yes its been explained and discussed until the cows come home but, having played several f2p games, I fear the inherent theme park-iness and impersonal bland experience that f2p games seem to share. I have faith that PGI will blow this away and make something awesome but I also know that marketting and hype can often exceed the actual game experience.

[Name140704]

LakeDaemon, on 09 February 2012 - 09:38 AM, said:

If the game lives up to very detailed hype then yes Im majorly stoked and I havent been this excited about a game.. ever.

The only thing that gives me any sense of apprehension is the f2p model. Yes its been explained and discussed until the cows come home but, having played several f2p games, I fear the inherent theme park-iness and impersonal bland experience that f2p games seem to share. I have faith that PGI will blow this away and make something awesome but I also know that marketting and hype can often exceed the actual game experience.

Same here. I'm worried that it will be too much like mechwarrior 4 multiplayer, where a bunch of the same 'mechs just snipe at each other from behind hills. How boring that was. Mechwarrior 4 series just sucked in general to me.

[armitage]

I do believe this will be the best mechwarrior game yet, it seems that it will encompass much more than aim and shoot like the previous games.

[Vernius Ix]

As long as they do not use the same F2P model that Wolrd of Tanks is using nothing could turn me away.

[xXPHANTASMXx]

I Like where MWO is going, my only wish is that the art style would incorporate more of that oldschool mech looks that we all love.

[xZaOx]

Loving it though, i can totally see this being delayed heavily. I can't see them releasing so quickly unless its EXTREMELY barebone.

[Mason Grimm]

Artifice, on 09 February 2012 - 04:22 AM, said:

That's the first time I've seen anyone steal the MechSpecs.com logo

[Mchawkeye]

**** yes.

[Tannhauser Gate]

Mason Grimm, on 09 February 2012 - 11:11 AM, said:

That's the first time I've seen anyone steal the MechSpecs.com logo

Immitation is the sincerest form of flattery. Or maybe they were too naive to think we wouldnt know where they shamelessly ripped it off from.

[Barantor]

Vernius Ix, on 09 February 2012 - 10:30 AM, said:

As long as they do not use the same F2P model that Wolrd of Tanks is using nothing could turn me away.

... and as long as they DO use the same F2P model as League of Legends....

[Mason Grimm]

LakeDaemon, on 09 February 2012 - 11:56 AM, said:

Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. Or maybe they were too naive to think we wouldnt know where they shamelessly ripped it off from.

Oh, I don't mind! They could have asked me and I'd have sent them the PSD file so they could do it properly

[Caballo]

I've been waiting to see what a focused group of programmers can do with a huge machine since i learned to play the TT game. Now it's time.

I'll see if the result is up to my expectations, but, by now, the posibility is here, and that's great.

[ManDaisy]

For the large part yes, however I do not like lone wolves always having to follow a group into combat. Some missions should be able to be performed solo. As for ways to do it I have already suggested two.

[renegade mitchell]

nano, on 09 February 2012 - 04:09 AM, said:

Based on all the information that has been released so far, do you like where the development of MWO is going?

Nope