Jump to content

Extra low graphics option


  • You cannot reply to this topic
48 replies to this topic

#41 White Bear 84

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 3,857 posts

Posted 01 November 2012 - 09:57 PM

What century are we in? :(

#42 Dorkselot

    Rookie

  • 7 posts

Posted 02 November 2012 - 02:50 AM

@Cthulu Jr dude i totaly support you my laptop is vry bad... and my PC is even worse... id like if there was a low spec version of the game...not as far as MW2 but at least specs like MW4....or above... but CRY engine 3... rly??? BTW ive noticed there are alot of hmm..."kids" here..i can only wish them to get ****** by life... the economy of their reagion to ******* collapse and they end up on the street so they learn some fkin humility...

#43 Beo Vulf

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Knight Errant
  • Knight Errant
  • 739 posts
  • Google+: Link
  • LocationHalsey, NE

Posted 02 November 2012 - 11:12 AM

View PostAdridos, on 13 September 2012 - 09:22 AM, said:

That would be quite extreme... ultra low with no graphic effects activated would suffice.

Actually something along the lines of the graphics pages in WOW would work for low end graphics users. Immensely more customizable than MWO. That's just one example.

#44 Wraen

    Member

  • PipPip
  • Knight Errant
  • 30 posts
  • Facebook: Link
  • LocationClarksburg, WV

Posted 02 November 2012 - 01:43 PM

I would gladly sacrifice graphics for better gameplay. I have a really good computer that JUST MEETS the requirements, but still not good enough and lags.

#45 PyroAcid

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 2
  • 102 posts
  • LocationCalifornia,Sierra nevada moutains,U.S.A

Posted 21 November 2012 - 05:16 PM

stop telling pepole what you think about what there doign and just tell us how to edit the damn thing and quit ******** about what ofthers are doing with there own gameing experince. who are you? you're no body with info i want now tell me and get on with your life.

#46 Jios

    Rookie

  • 2 posts

Posted 14 December 2012 - 09:11 AM

Were min hardware requirements raised recently?

Im running a 460gtx 2nd edition, intel g850 2.9ghz , ddr3-1333 cross the board.

Since the shader effects were upgraded, my performance has gone down the toilet (especially on water maps).

Best dx9 effects Ive seen to be fair but why was the less complicated, more efficient water effect dropped?

#47 canned wolf

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 681 posts
  • LocationFort Collins Colorado

Posted 14 December 2012 - 10:29 AM

View PostRAM, on 13 September 2012 - 01:47 PM, said:

I gather uninstalling/deleting/removing AFP is not an option?


MWO will not run well – but it will run.


RAM
ELH


A less drastic solution would be to stop the Adobe process before you start mechwarrior, or take it out of your startup in msconfig. If your laptop stays turned off when you're not using Adobe is probably updating.

As far as introducind a new graphics mode... No. This might not seem like a big request, but every graphic mode has to be balanced to play against all the others with no advantages or drawbacks. If you turn off a particle effect that blocks other players line of sight, the low end machine gets an advantage.

#48 Jios

    Rookie

  • 2 posts

Posted 15 December 2012 - 03:40 AM

Thanks for the clarification.

I can see on the other hand, turning off shadows would put people at a disadvantage over people that could see shadows.

#49 Kiblams

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • Bridesmaid
  • 80 posts

Posted 15 December 2012 - 04:15 AM

Are you guys sure that it is the graphics that need to be reduced? as I see it now, it is the CPU demands of this game that are the hindrance, I have a low-med graphics card (ATI 7750) and it is capable of great framerates until I turn my mech (legs not torso) which must be doing something to the CPU as framerates dive towards 10.

Have any of you tried monitoring the system loads (windowed mode with CPU/GPU monitoring software to one side of the screen) during play? I am really looking forward to them fixing the code so my 7750 can get a look in and provide me the pretty gameplay I can get in all other games :P

I can't help feeling that the latest Frostbite engine might have been a better choice as that already supports tank turret gameplay for the Battlefield games.

Edited by Kiblams, 15 December 2012 - 04:18 AM.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users