Facebook poll: Which of the listed 65 ton 'Mechs would you most like to use?
#61
Posted 13 March 2012 - 03:20 PM
#62
Posted 13 March 2012 - 03:22 PM
#63
Posted 13 March 2012 - 03:26 PM
#64
Posted 13 March 2012 - 03:29 PM
Azantia, on 13 March 2012 - 01:15 PM, said:
Bombardier
Jagermech
so anti-davion I know.....but i hate the jagermech....I always had to play one for tabletop (opponnent always got to choose some of the mechs you ran in league play from your faction list) and any smart player choose the Jagermech. Why? cause it only had 6 tons of armor! (96 armor points)...JM6-A had slightly more....8 TONS!...what a frickin joke.....
Axman minus the ax just isnt the same, good mech, but it goes into the 2nd slot behind the Bombardier, however, we already have a 65 ton missile boating fire support mech, its called a Catapult, therefore Axman goes back to number one....I would prefer the Thunderbolt, and as i understand the Thunderbolt is "Reseen".
http://www.sarna.net/wiki/Reseen
Thunderbolt would be at the top of my list for 65 ton battlemechs, period.
It hurts my eyes too see all that "stolen"/Borrowed Gundam like japano robot legs....
I thank the Gods for the redesing programm of Mechwarrior Online...
about time someone put the "Mech" back into the 21st century
Edited by Andar89, 13 March 2012 - 03:30 PM.
#65
Posted 13 March 2012 - 03:34 PM
#66
Posted 13 March 2012 - 03:39 PM
#67
Posted 13 March 2012 - 03:42 PM
A: We already have a Catapult confirmed, which is nearly identical to the bombardier and also 65 tons.
B: The JagerMech is a lightly armored long range mech, similar in purpose to the catapult, just with direct fire weapons.
Currently, if we CAN use the mech's axe, the Axeman is my vote. If we can't, the JagerMech and the Axman are nuetral in terms of utility, and the Bombardier is only a desirable option from a style point as it is made superfluous by the Catapult.
#68
Posted 13 March 2012 - 03:47 PM
#69
Posted 13 March 2012 - 03:48 PM
#70
Posted 13 March 2012 - 03:50 PM
#71
Posted 13 March 2012 - 03:54 PM
#72
Posted 13 March 2012 - 03:54 PM
#73
Posted 13 March 2012 - 03:57 PM
#74
Posted 13 March 2012 - 03:57 PM
That said, i'm a brawler, so i need a huge autocannon, and something for the punchline... like an axe in the face. The Axeman suits me well.
#75
Posted 13 March 2012 - 04:36 PM
#76
Posted 13 March 2012 - 04:46 PM
Of the 3, I'm inclined to say "Bombardier", which is good for the fire support role, though it has serious weaknesses defending at close range. The Axman probably has the strongest overall capabilities, but it's also crammed to the gills with LostTech - ferro-fibrous armor, XL engine, double heat sinks, pulse laser, CASE... why not just throw a Clanner LOLoki into the mix while you're at it?
Edit: Or the Crusader, which would also not suck.
Edited by Solis Obscuri, 13 March 2012 - 04:50 PM.
#77
Posted 13 March 2012 - 04:57 PM
Getting the axe to actually work in this game (or any game, frankly) would be a real bother to code.
Edited by Gremlich Johns, 13 March 2012 - 04:59 PM.
#78
Posted 13 March 2012 - 05:05 PM
#79
Posted 13 March 2012 - 05:13 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users