Poll Here!
#221
Posted 26 March 2012 - 12:03 PM
And, if they ever put up poles including the classic 14 mechs, most, if not all, would win and everyone knows it.
The 80 tonner that is the obvious pick is the Awesome, which has 3 PPC's. I would vote for the Zeus and Victor before I'd vote for the awesome. I'm holding out for the Warhammer, too, though. The MWO developers will probably hold off bringing out the unseen mechs until the release, but I bet we WILL see them. This is the biggest, most public forum on the subject and very few people will let it go. If someone wants to sue, they're going to have a hard time proving it and will have to put up with thousands of terrorists, er, I mean Battletech fans who know better!
#222
Posted 26 March 2012 - 12:21 PM
GD26, on 25 March 2012 - 11:51 PM, said:
Why isn't the Warhammer?
One of the most used designs at this time throughout the IS. Powerfull, capable and all that.
I always wondered. Even been one of the two protagonists in the awesome 2009 Mechwarrior trailer.
Yet we got the Dragon and the Hunchback....
because its aimed at 80 t mechs, not 70t for one thing
#223
Posted 26 March 2012 - 12:30 PM
Escef, on 22 March 2012 - 08:19 PM, said:
I didn't realize they ever got the PPC field inhibitor issue ironed out until the -9S came out - thanks for the info!
#224
Posted 26 March 2012 - 12:36 PM
#225
Posted 27 March 2012 - 02:45 AM
#226
Posted 27 March 2012 - 02:51 AM
#227
Posted 27 March 2012 - 03:44 AM
#228
Posted 27 March 2012 - 06:40 AM
Open ground -Zues
City fight -Victor
Brawl- Thug
Edited by irish, 27 March 2012 - 06:40 AM.
#229
Posted 29 March 2012 - 12:48 PM
#230
Posted 29 March 2012 - 02:03 PM
I really want the Zeus-X that is pictured on the max-tech cover, I mean it just drips of BAD A**...
#232
Posted 29 March 2012 - 02:30 PM
#233
Posted 29 March 2012 - 02:31 PM
#234
Posted 02 April 2012 - 10:40 AM
Jump capable with a great loadout, and it's the name of the son of the ruler of my chosen House.
#235
Posted 02 April 2012 - 06:57 PM
#236
Posted 02 April 2012 - 07:05 PM
#237
Posted 02 April 2012 - 07:20 PM
Edited by Zhanna Kerensky, 02 April 2012 - 07:21 PM.
#238
Posted 02 April 2012 - 07:23 PM
#239
Posted 04 April 2012 - 06:43 AM
#240
Posted 04 April 2012 - 06:56 AM
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users






















