1890 replies to this topic

[wanderer]

Chronojam, on 01 November 2012 - 12:58 AM, said:

He was furious. He wasn't sure who to be furious at, but he was furious.

The best part was he tried to stop me by shooting my LEG off.

While I was patiently demonstrating how to spay or neuter your Gausscat (he was down a gun by the time you showed up). With my arm mounted lasers. Which he could have shot off instead. Derp.

[Reverend]

Watching you guys trying to explain something to Adridos is like watching someone try to explain how baby's are made to a toddler.

[Swiss Beats]

Reverend, on 01 November 2012 - 07:47 AM, said:

Watching you guys trying to explain something to Adridos is like watching someone try to explain how baby's are made to a toddler.

Using flash cards and colored objects or the straight up first year med school technique?

[Reverend]

demonr6, on 01 November 2012 - 08:00 AM, said:

Using flash cards and colored objects or the straight up first year med school technique?

The new parent never had to explain it trying to ******** his way through it by using the "stork" and "when a mommy and daddy kiss" method.

[JustMe SR]

MUST PROVE ALL OF YOU WRONG

fil5000, on 31 October 2012 - 08:47 AM, said:

Your point of view is clear from the tone of your questions

! My point of view isn't cler unless I write it here !

You just think you know what my point of view is from what you read.

Tank Boy Ken, on 31 October 2012 - 01:16 PM, said:

It's quite possible.
e.g. "What do you think of the Green Sun we have ?"

So "What do you think of something we don't have?"
Thus "What do you think of something that doesn't exist?"
Therefore "What do you think of nothing?"

Your answer will be "I think of nothing this."
It isn't wrong, they just asked you what do you think of nothing.

(Pesonally my answer would be : I think of the Green Sun you have, that it is still better than COD. )

Banned, on 31 October 2012 - 03:34 PM, said:

Aparently I was not sarcastic enough in my previous post.

You were sarcastic?

Banned, on 31 October 2012 - 10:09 AM, said:

Did you know that it is impossible to lie/be wrong in the format of a question?

Yes I did.

Lemniscate, on 31 October 2012 - 10:25 AM, said:

Certainly not impossible to be stupid in the form of a question however.

Questions give no informations. They just ask for answers.
You could find out something about pleople asking questions,
just from their questions. But nothing of it must be 100% true.

You can find out that someone is stupid from this question:
"How do I use head?"
Just like you can find out that someone asking this question has Green Sun.
"What do you think of the Green Sun we have ?"

When someone asks you question "How do I use head?",
it does't actually mean he doesn't know how to use his head.
He never gave you that information. He just asked you to tell him, how to use head.

Edited by JustMe SR, 01 November 2012 - 08:41 AM.

[Grraarrgghh]

JustMe SR, on 01 November 2012 - 08:35 AM, said:

MUST PROVE ALL OF YOU WRONG

! My point of view isn't cler unless I write it here !

You just think you know what my point of view is from what you read.




So "What do you think of something we don't have?"
Thus "What do you think of something that doesn't exist?"
Therefore "What do you think of nothing?"

Your answer will be "I think of nothing this."
It isn't wrong, they just asked you what do you think of nothing.

(Pesonally my answer would be : I think of the Green Sun you have, that it is still better than COD. )



You were sarcastic?




Yes I did.



Questions give no informations. They just ask for answers.
You could find out something about pleople asking questions,
just from their questions. But nothing of it must be 100% true.

You can find out that someone is stupid from this question:
"How do I use head?"
Just like you can find out that someone asking this question has Green Sun.
"What do you think of the Green Sun we have ?"

When someone asks you question "How do I use head?",
it does't actually mean he doesn't know how to use his head.
He never gave you that information. He just asked you to tell him, how to use head.

The circuitous logic, its staggering.

[Lemniscate]

JustMe SR, on 01 November 2012 - 08:35 AM, said:

Questions give no informations. They just ask for answers.
You could find out something about pleople asking questions,
just from their questions. But nothing of it must be 100% true.

You can find out that someone is stupid from this question:
"How do I use head?"
Just like you can find out that someone asking this question has Green Sun.
"What do you think of the Green Sun we have ?"

When someone asks you question "How do I use head?",
it does't actually mean he doesn't know how to use his head.
He never gave you that information. He just asked you to tell him, how to use head.

I realize you're arguing just to argue (and illustrate how thick you are to everyone), but just to demonstrate how bad your logic here is I'll go ahead and take this apart minimally.

"Questions give no informations. They just ask for answers."

Every question asked is full of implicit information. It tells you, if absolutely nothing else, something that the questioner wants to know (or wants you to think they want to know); that is, the person asking the question believes it to be relevant and this information is given in the question itself. No communication exists in a vacuum, there is always context and so there is always information conveyed.

So yes, we can tell how stupid you are just from the questions you ask.

Edited by Lemniscate, 01 November 2012 - 09:07 AM.

[Swiss Beats]

Grraarrgghh, on 01 November 2012 - 08:52 AM, said:

The circuitous logic, its staggering.

This guy cannot be serious with that reply. If you do not mind my borrowing some of your nic for this reply but aarrgghh!

Edited by demonr6, 01 November 2012 - 09:46 AM.

[Ken Fury]

Grraarrgghh, on 01 November 2012 - 08:52 AM, said:

The circuitous logic, its staggering.

Yeah my Head is spinning, as is the PGI Logo

Or do you think this one is better? (need to clean it up though):


I admit those are my first animated gifs ever, so they essentially are bad.

Edited by Tank Boy Ken, 01 November 2012 - 09:52 AM.

[JustMe SR]

Lemniscate, on 01 November 2012 - 09:06 AM, said:

It tells you, if absolutely nothing else, something that the questioner wants to know (or wants you to think they want to know)

Questioner does not have to want something.

Lemniscate, on 01 November 2012 - 09:06 AM, said:

No communication exists in a vacuum.

Sure, in vacuum there is no air for soud to travel in.
Thus: "No communication can exist in a vacuum."

Edited by JustMe SR, 01 November 2012 - 10:26 AM.

[Grraarrgghh]

JustMe SR, on 01 November 2012 - 10:20 AM, said:

Questioner does not have to want something.

Bolding things doesn't make them true.

[Lemniscate]

JustMe SR, on 01 November 2012 - 10:20 AM, said:

Questioner does not have to want something.

The questioner wants you to consider something, that is the nature of questions.

Please consider this: why do you think everyone else always seems smarter than you?

Edited by Lemniscate, 01 November 2012 - 10:26 AM.

[JustMe SR]

Lemniscate, on 01 November 2012 - 10:25 AM, said:

The questioner wants you to consider something, that is the nature of questions.

! BUT IT DOESN'T HAVE TO BE !

Lemniscate, on 01 November 2012 - 10:25 AM, said:

Please consider this: why do you think Lemniscate and Grraarrgghh think they are smarter than you?

Fixed it for you.

[Chronojam]

JustMe SR, on 01 November 2012 - 10:31 AM, said:

Age: 14 years old
Birthday: January 15, 1998

Well ****, that explains it, doesn't it? He's 14 and ESL, you can't expect him to make any amount of sense.

[Reverend]

Goons, what do you think of all this non sense up in the general discussion forum. Specifically pertaining to this Pug vs Premade non sense. I just checked out two threads where the poster played "10 matches" and claims that the other team was "obviously a premade" due to having several factors. 1.) A large amount of Founders Badges, 2.) Custom Variant Mechs 3.) Coordinated fire! and 4.) Several lights that would attempt to cap the base while a lone atlas would charge out into the enemy ranks and die while the rest flanked for diversion!

Are they really this stupid?

[Grraarrgghh]

Reverend, on 01 November 2012 - 10:55 AM, said:

Goons, what do you think of all this non sense up in the general discussion forum. Specifically pertaining to this Pug vs Premade non sense. I just checked out two threads where the poster played "10 matches" and claims that the other team was "obviously a premade" due to having several factors. 1.) A large amount of Founders Badges, 2.) Custom Variant Mechs 3.) Coordinated fire! and 4.) Several lights that would attempt to cap the base while a lone atlas would charge out into the enemy ranks and die while the rest flanked for diversion!

Are they really this stupid?

Is water wet?

[fil5000]

Reverend, on 01 November 2012 - 10:55 AM, said:

Goons, what do you think of all this non sense up in the general discussion forum. Specifically pertaining to this Pug vs Premade non sense. I just checked out two threads where the poster played "10 matches" and claims that the other team was "obviously a premade" due to having several factors. 1.) A large amount of Founders Badges, 2.) Custom Variant Mechs 3.) Coordinated fire! and 4.) Several lights that would attempt to cap the base while a lone atlas would charge out into the enemy ranks and die while the rest flanked for diversion!

Are they really this stupid?

That Jun guy? He's been banging the "raaaa premades!" drum for a while. I wouldn't expect anything different there.

If you want some correct opinions, why not look here:

http://themittani.co.../mwo-state-play

(Spoilers: my opinions are the best ones)

[Ter Ushaka]

Reverend, on 01 November 2012 - 10:55 AM, said:

Goons, what do you think of all this non sense up in the general discussion forum. Specifically pertaining to this Pug vs Premade non sense. I just checked out two threads where the poster played "10 matches" and claims that the other team was "obviously a premade" due to having several factors. 1.) A large amount of Founders Badges, 2.) Custom Variant Mechs 3.) Coordinated fire! and 4.) Several lights that would attempt to cap the base while a lone atlas would charge out into the enemy ranks and die while the rest flanked for diversion!

Are they really this stupid?

Does Jerry Sandusky like little boys?

[JustMe SR]

Chronojam, on 01 November 2012 - 10:47 AM, said:

Well ****, that explains it, doesn't it? He's 14 and ESL, you can't expect him to make any amount of sense.

That you didn't make any amount of sense when you were 14, doesn't mean I don't.
Idiocy isn't thing of age.


Now. Can we get back to proving my (no information giving) questions wrong?

After several failures at trying to explain you that quetions can not be proven wrong, I give up trying to explain you simple things. Instead I dare you to prove all of my questions wrong (if it is possible ).

Edited by JustMe SR, 01 November 2012 - 11:23 AM.

[Grraarrgghh]

JustMe SR, on 01 November 2012 - 11:18 AM, said:

Instead I dare you to prove all of my questions wrong if it is possible.

OH NO HE DI'INT!