MethosFurey, on 03 May 2012 - 03:45 PM, said:
Hylius, on 03 May 2012 - 03:53 PM, said:
For example, our unit: Eridani Light Pony. Our name is a derivative of a canon unit. However we claim no ties to the ELH, do not claim to represent them, be a subfaction, that their history is ours, etc. etc. We just derived our name and icon based on theirs due to both being equines. That's it. Does that fall under the canon protection scheme? I don't think so the way you described it but it would be nice for it to be in the clear, because I imagine a lot of people would report it just because of the naming. (If you do allow a report method for names, I'd suggest implementing a "cannot report because already verified to be okay" setting in your design so you don't have to waste time on stuff already discussed. Plus it removes the "this mod said it was okay but you say it's not and now my group is disbanded" moments.)
Werewolf Fetladral, on 03 May 2012 - 04:27 PM, said:
that answered? lol
On the same note... Wolf Spider Battalion? So instead of Battalion, Wolf Spider [WS] would be allowed.
or as long as we don't have Wolf Dragoons in front of out names, Wolf Spider Battalion is good?
I might just not be understanding all the fine print here.
Werewolf Fetladral, on 03 May 2012 - 05:05 PM, said:
Sub-cannon Units = If you change the name around and association. (should be allowed IMO)
Bryan already stated that the CSRs will have the final say in this. If a CSR feels that your unit name is too closely tied to an existing canon unit or sub-unit it will be changed or you will be banned.
At this point, I think it's safe to say Smoke Jaguar Reborn, Eridani Light Pony and Wolf Spiders would all three be subject to a CSR's discretion (although putting Smoke and Jaguar side by side is apt to not make it through the name filter in the first place). If I were you, I'd play it safe. That's the route we're going.