data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3ae9/b3ae9cf8cfed3e06df6984fcf2a08c460eab065d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b019d/b019dff8be3f348eaaa2018f2de34562ef233d3e" alt=""
Regarding 3rd Person View
#2121
Posted 23 March 2013 - 02:08 PM
#2122
Posted 23 March 2013 - 03:50 PM
Kilo Sensei, on 23 March 2013 - 11:19 AM, said:
Like a 3rd person view drone that adds on like a ecm module, it gives you more sideview at once but can be shot down.
Make the 3rd person view drone a BAP module. That would rock.
#2123
Posted 23 March 2013 - 04:16 PM
Zerstorer Stallin, on 23 March 2013 - 12:13 PM, said:
Saying that MW2-4 didn't tank is laughable. It also tells me you a CoD kiddie otherwise you'd know that.
Unsuccessful games don't spawn multiple expansion packs and sequels...
Zerstorer Stallin, on 23 March 2013 - 12:19 PM, said:
I see this on your site:
So you're saying the current game isn't a 1st person game. How would you feel if it said first and third person on that site link instead, and you logged in and found out there was no 3rd?
Oh, and I'm awaiting your inevitable tears when 12v12 is released since that image clearly says 8v8 combat.
Quote
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ab3cb/ab3cb474ef4892ef5a43ce828d298e48b30d5fbd" alt="Posted Image"
Have you tried reading that second paragraph?
Quote
What does this have to do with anything? Wanting the thread to not devolve into a mw vs ma debate has nothing to do with anything? And the current suggested implementation is closer to mw 3rd than ma.
Quote
"Looking at what would require if we did" fits well with Paul's first statement at investigating in the future. Not to mention you don't look at something that you never plan on doing. That's like saying I'm going to look how to make a new entertainment center but have no plans to buy a TV.
Quote
So I guess it feels pretty bait-and-switch of you to push 3pv on the game at this point.
4% of a typical weekend player base (be a hero had over 100k players).
#2124
Posted 23 March 2013 - 08:02 PM
If it is the minority, I can see that PGI/IGP wont miss the income from the hard core players.
If the 3499 that voted before did not buy any further MC for monthly sub, it would drop about $52,485 per month from the coffers. Thats presuming all no long bought anything and that they were only purchasing the minimum each month. Anywhere from $52K upwards is not a small number to ignore, but if they have stats showing that all those people who dont speak on the forums have somehow voiced in a non-seen forum that they want 3rd person, then I guess the casual player will now be considered the default choice.
I truly am very disappointed and at this stage will not be purchasing any more MC.
#2125
Posted 24 March 2013 - 12:55 AM
hammerreborn, on 23 March 2013 - 04:16 PM, said:
Have you even got the idea how statistics work? You poll small fraction of community and get the estimated results. If you trully believe that whole rest of community would be for introducing 3rd pv when we got 3.5k which voted no, against 186 which were for, then you are out of your mind.
Edited by Xelrah, 24 March 2013 - 12:56 AM.
#2126
Posted 24 March 2013 - 01:23 AM
BFett, on 23 March 2013 - 01:35 PM, said:
If you do the math the percentage of players lost to not adding 3rd person is nearly nothing compared to the numbers lost if even a quarter of the people who want 1st person only left.
Again:
Forums do not represent a majority of the game's playerbase, or the majority of players opinions.
They represent the most vocal minority and most "hardcore" and social players.
Quote
Or you know, direct feedback in emails, comments on other sites reviewing the game, discussions on gaming sites and blogs.
Edited by Kvalheim, 24 March 2013 - 01:24 AM.
#2127
Posted 24 March 2013 - 01:35 AM
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2be9/c2be9ba84b0aee57ef37db8584e1cab477350ae1" alt=":("
#2129
Posted 24 March 2013 - 07:41 AM
Kvalheim, on 24 March 2013 - 01:23 AM, said:
Again:
Forums do not represent a majority of the game's playerbase, or the majority of players opinions.
They represent the most vocal minority and most "hardcore" and social players.
Or you know, direct feedback in emails, comments on other sites reviewing the game, discussions on gaming sites and blogs.
If your statement is true then it should be easy for you or PGI to come up with overwhelming evidence to support your point of view and to share that evidence with the 3,000 people who voted against the idea. Without proof otherwise, the poll is very accurate because of the number of people that have responded to it. Even if 40 people had taken the survey the percentages would have stayed within 1 to 2% of each other.
#2131
Posted 24 March 2013 - 09:04 AM
Don't add a view to help new Pilots, Add a Tutorial.
#2132
Posted 24 March 2013 - 07:56 PM
#2133
Posted 25 March 2013 - 12:01 AM
Simply a birds eye view via rocket and parashute camera in one corner of the hud.
#2134
Posted 25 March 2013 - 03:49 AM
Edited by EvilCow, 25 March 2013 - 06:50 AM.
#2135
Posted 25 March 2013 - 09:46 AM
#2136
Posted 25 March 2013 - 03:27 PM
No 3rd person view!
#2137
Posted 25 March 2013 - 04:06 PM
#2138
Posted 25 March 2013 - 05:11 PM
#2139
Posted 25 March 2013 - 08:25 PM
Mormaz, on 22 March 2013 - 11:34 AM, said:
They WANT MOAR but can't afford to lose their first customers.
except that this WILL shove a tremendous portion of us away with out question. We openly CANNOT TRUST THEM. They said one thing, now do another, and worse yet, they willfully violate a KEY DESIGN PILLAR to pander to the lowest common denominator. It is NOT the casual players and non-hardcore players that will float this game, it is those of us who are the hardcore die-hard fans that they are now blissfully shooing away with what amounts to a fatal choice for this game.
#2140
Posted 25 March 2013 - 11:31 PM
11 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 11 guests, 0 anonymous users