Honey Badger, on 23 December 2012 - 07:07 AM, said:
If you ordered from Amazon, sorry to hear about your issues. I just did a build with stuff from Amazon and everything came packaged up very nicely. My wife has Amazon Prime, so I got the free 2-day shipping. Maybe that was the difference.
I've gotten a little criticism a few times on my build for opting for a GTX 660 over a Radeon 7950. I guess I went with what a few of the guys I do drops with recommended to me as well as available cash on hand. I may yet go with something different, but right now, I'm cranked on max settings at 1920x1080 running my GTX 660 with Lucid Logix running and no additional OC tweaks other than the factory one. I am getting mid-60 FPS with lows in the mid40s. And for me thats brawling in the middle of the water in the city map. For me I always had the worst performance on the city map with my old PC. As for my Lucid Logix setup I opted for running out of my GPU card HDMI port and making sure I have v-sync set. I did opt for the MSI TF/OC version and am very happy. I'm sure you'll get the same satisfaction from from your MSI Radeon 7950.
As for 7950 over a 7970, when I researched it, it seemed to be a very incremental increase in performance over the $60 to $100 premium you pay to have it. Plus if you really want 7970 performance, you can prolly OC or tweak you 7950 to get it fairly easily.
I opted for a micro-ATX build, similiar to your ITX build. Unique layout, but I was a lot of fun to build. I've got my i5-3570K OCed to 4.6GHz on 1.24v and a 46x multiplier. Using a factory enclosed water block for it. Very happy with that too. I think as far as LGA1155 builds, especially for this game, the i5-3570K is pretty hard to beat in $/performance.
It was from Amazon, and really it's the first problem I've had from their packaging in 3 yrs. I've been a Prime subscriber for 2 yrs out of that run. Can't beat the shipping prices really, Prime instant videos not withstanding
No criticism found here on a 660 Ti build, I just prefer to support AMD in one manner or the other in favor of balanced pricing through competition. For me, everyones free to like what they like, and do whatever makes them happy.
Plus, I'm not a fan of nVidia due to their anti-competitive nature, and Jen Hsun Huang isn't my favorite person at all.

Throw that in w/ my old 8800 GT getting bricked by a certain "196.75" driver update way back when and...yeah. I gently remind people of that incident when they talk negatively about AMD/ATi drivers.
Concerning drivers: On the 12.11b drivers, as far as FPS goes, the 7950's are kicking the 670's teeth in, in all but a very few select titles. As for the frame latency/microstutter issue that's making the rounds currently, I don't see it at all personally. But then, my eyes don't record at 120 FPS either. I'll be testing the frame latency myself after I get it all back together to independently verify, and I'll report back with my results.
That said, I really wanted the R7970 Lightning for the unlocked bios and additional power phases, but it just wasn't in the cards w/ the holidays right around the corner. Besides which, I have a few bios tricks to play on the R7950 TF 3, and the modded Saphire Trixx 4.04B which should go a long way. Seeing as how I managed to max out the Afterburner slider on clock & memory (1100/1500 core/mem. Furmark stable @ 24 hrs burn in) with stock voltage while testing on the original air cooler, that is. Possible golden gpu here.
Under water, there should be a drastic improvement in temps (especially where VRM's & memory are concerned), and a h3ll of a lot more headroom for oc'ing. I'll find out soon enough. But you're correct, only a rather marginal 5% performance increase w/ the 7970 over the 7950. Not worth it to most people with the price difference for sure. Although for a benchtester, yeah. Worth it!
Thanks for responding! Hope you're having a great holiday weekend!
Sen, on 23 December 2012 - 07:55 AM, said:
Wouldn't mind seeing some pics of the de-lidding. . . I have to say you've got more b4lls than i do on that one. . I've heard both good and bad things about doing it. Sorry to hear about the leak. . . and it makes perfect sense on an intel: By comparison, thanks to LLC, I only ever have issues with things crashing at IDLE! I can prime95 for weeks. . but leave chrome open and walk away for an hour and it's frozen
Take it as a good sign, something ALWAYS has to go wrong, at least it was something obvious ^^
Thanks Sen! Sure, no problem, glad to show you how it comes out. You'll have to deal with cell pics though, being that my lady is out of town w/ my camera until Wednesday, I'm sorry to say. I'm just about to tear it down and get started on it. Full syringe of Coolabratory Liquid Pro @ the ready.
I totally forget if I've mentioned it, but I'll be going direct to die w/ the Apogee Drive II, for the best possible temps. I'd really like to see close to 5 Ghz out of this chip, if not a little better (some have eclipsed 5.4 Gigglehurtz w/ direct to die on Ivy). I can only hope!
Any ideas what the problem is w/ LLC causing your system to lock? C1E & all of that off, I would assume? Is it just with Chrome? Stable build, or the Canary beta/nightly's? If so, try turning off the GPU accelleration, as that's been a culprit with many people's systems. Firefox even had the same problem recently, memory leakage was suspected, but not proven afaik. I run a custom build of Pale Moon (Firefox) myself. No problems here, so far.
Yeah, there's always at least one problem with every new build, isn't there? I may have turned up a second after posting last night. I'm not getting the performance I'd expect out of the SRT raid array. At least where sequential read/writes are concerned. Comparatively speaking, with a 1 Tb Velociraptor and the 50 Gb Crucial Adrenaline cache SSD (which everyone suspects is based on the M4), are roughly doubling my sequential read/write scores on Crystal Diskmark & HDTune. 512k reads are in line, but the writes are again nearly 2/3's slower. 4k & QD32-4k are a bit faster on mine though.
The m4 is on a SATA III port, and the Velociraptor is on a SATA II.
Maybe it's a driver problem, and I don't have time to play with it w/ all else going on atm. After it's back up and running, I'm going to delete the SRT cache array after a backup, and retest individually each drive to make sure there's nothing funky going on w/ the drives alone. Failing that, I'll swap the ports to see if that has any measureable effect. It really shouldn't, because the Velociraptor shouldn't have a hope in hell at saturating a SATA II connection. We'll see though.
Edited by Teh Rav3n, 23 December 2012 - 02:54 PM.