

Far Cry 3 Vs Mwo (Graphics And Fps)
#1
Posted 30 November 2012 - 01:27 PM
MWO other wise I put it at 1650 x 1050, medium graphics at DX9 and all I get is 22-35 fps average. PGI fix your stuff.
1) Far Cry 3 graphics LOOKS AMAZING. EVEN BETTER THAN MWO.
2) Frame rate was literally doubled on Far Cry 3.
3) I don't care if it is beta or not, if people can't play this game, there won't be any money coming.
#2
Posted 30 November 2012 - 01:28 PM
RiceyFighter, on 30 November 2012 - 01:27 PM, said:
MWO other wise I put it at 1650 x 1050, medium graphics at DX9 and all I get is 22-35 fps average. PGI fix your stuff.
1) Far Cry 3 graphics LOOKS AMAZING. EVEN BETTER THAN MWO.
2) Frame rate was literally doubled on Far Cry 3.
3) I don't care if it is beta or not, if people can't play this game, there won't be any money coming.
My real issue is that the game was playable for me a month or so ago 20-30fps
but post cry3.4 I cannot play at all as I get 6-8fps in combat with constant stuttering
#3
Posted 30 November 2012 - 01:28 PM
#4
Posted 30 November 2012 - 01:32 PM
#5
Posted 30 November 2012 - 01:33 PM
Jacek Owens, on 30 November 2012 - 01:32 PM, said:
No it's not.
Also, this game is in beta. FC3 is a full release.
Edited by Grraarrgghh, 30 November 2012 - 01:34 PM.
#7
Posted 30 November 2012 - 01:35 PM
Edited by Kobold, 30 November 2012 - 01:35 PM.
#8
Posted 30 November 2012 - 01:35 PM
Jacek Owens, on 30 November 2012 - 01:33 PM, said:
http://en.wikipedia....ki/Dunia_Engine
#9
Posted 30 November 2012 - 01:36 PM
Edited by Jacek Owens, 30 November 2012 - 01:36 PM.
#10
Posted 30 November 2012 - 01:36 PM
Someone beats me to it.

Edited by Vosgedzam, 30 November 2012 - 01:37 PM.
#11
Posted 30 November 2012 - 01:37 PM

#12
Posted 30 November 2012 - 01:39 PM
Grraarrgghh, on 30 November 2012 - 01:33 PM, said:
No it's not.
Also, this game is in beta. FC3 is a full release.
Plus FarCry has a much larger developer team with a large publisher who pumps more money into it a week then this game likely has ever had.
Besides, lots of people don't have these FPS problems. I run it on max with nothing more than an average computer and I never have FPS issues.
#13
Posted 30 November 2012 - 01:45 PM
Two Weeks for those who don't understand or were too young back then, is a joke made on EA when an update (I forget the games name) was supposed to come in two weeks....it took 4 months for it to come so it became a joke in the gaming community.
#14
Posted 30 November 2012 - 01:45 PM
#15
Posted 30 November 2012 - 01:46 PM
#16
Posted 30 November 2012 - 01:48 PM
Jacek Owens, on 30 November 2012 - 01:46 PM, said:
I noticed this too, when I looked at the list again since I literally could not name a single CryEngine game other than Crysis or MWO off the top of my head.
#17
Posted 30 November 2012 - 01:56 PM
#18
Posted 30 November 2012 - 01:58 PM
Wikipedia said:
In February, the Official PlayStation Magazine suggested that the game was due for release at the end of 2011 as the following quote suggested, "Start taking the malaria medicine in preparation: Far Cry 3 could be arriving before the end of the year."[20] This statement was withdrawn in next month's edition where it was stated that the game would be shown on 2011's E3 and that the release date would be bumped back to 2012.[full citation needed] In May, the CVs of a couple of stuntmen listed Far Cry 3 as one of their previous projects.[21] The first official walkthrough was released at the 2011 E3 conference on June 6, 2011.
Wikipedia said:
It damn well better look nice.
Edited by Vlad Ward, 30 November 2012 - 01:58 PM.
#19
Posted 30 November 2012 - 01:59 PM
#20
Posted 30 November 2012 - 02:01 PM
DirectX11 is not yet implemented.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users