ISN News Flash
#1
Posted 12 May 2012 - 08:00 AM
#2
Posted 12 May 2012 - 08:03 AM
#3
Posted 12 May 2012 - 08:08 AM
#4
Posted 12 May 2012 - 08:13 AM
Edited by Prosperity Park, 12 May 2012 - 08:14 AM.
#5
Posted 12 May 2012 - 08:25 AM
#6
Posted 12 May 2012 - 08:26 AM
Double HS + 4 PPC + ECM to screw up all that funky Artemis IV/NARC/C3 = FULL OF WIN
the 9M is a joke on the sheer virtue of that XL engine. Takes away the zombie-ness the 8Q was well-known for, even for an assault mech
#7
Posted 12 May 2012 - 08:49 AM
#8
Posted 12 May 2012 - 09:03 AM
Edited by Fresh_Meat, 12 May 2012 - 09:03 AM.
#9
Posted 12 May 2012 - 10:08 AM
#10
Posted 12 May 2012 - 10:42 AM
Haakon Valravn, on 12 May 2012 - 08:49 AM, said:
FF armor is actually the least useful of the upgrades in the IS. It eats up 14 critical slots, much more than the XL engine and equal to endo steel, in exchange for getting 2 extra armor points per ton. That means for every 4.5 tons you replace, you save half a ton. An Atlas has 19 tons of standard armor. Replace it with FF and you would be spending between 17 and 17.5 tons, depending of if you wanted to go a little over or a little under, and that's if you could find the critical slots for it.
For comparison, an Endo Steel replacement would use the same number of critical slots but free up 5 tons of weight. An XL engine would free up 9 tons for six slots (and some added vulnerability, so put some of that freed up weight into boosting side torso armor!)
They're the easiest to perform after market in TT perhaps, but that's about its only virtue.
#11
Posted 12 May 2012 - 06:57 PM
#13
Posted 13 May 2012 - 01:46 AM
If this was made in the DCMS, they will fill it with those infamous Lord's Light 2 ER PPC that Panther pilots were throwing away in droves.....
#14
Posted 13 May 2012 - 05:55 AM
The ERPPCs have the longest reach in the game for the Inner Sphere for this era. They lack a minimum range, so they have no problems hole-punching even when getting rushed into a brawl. The increased speed over the old -8Q allows it to back more easily away from advancing battle lines (in TT this is huge because it can still acquire a Movement Modifier after turning once), and the Medium Pulse Laser + Streak SRM-2 combo is decent at slowing down support vehicles that attempt to rush in to harry the 'Mech.
It's a great support 'Mech, it just needs a lot more room to maneuver (TT players read: more mapsheets) to get the most out of its loadout. A fire-sink it is not, however (why would you want to get hit, especially if you can hit them where they can't reach you?), so please do not try to judge it along the same lines that faux-bunker Standard Fusion 'Mechs are judged by.
#15
Posted 13 May 2012 - 06:24 AM
#16
Posted 13 May 2012 - 08:23 AM
Ramien, on 12 May 2012 - 10:42 AM, said:
For comparison, an Endo Steel replacement would use the same number of critical slots but free up 5 tons of weight. An XL engine would free up 9 tons for six slots (and some added vulnerability, so put some of that freed up weight into boosting side torso armor!)
They're the easiest to perform after market in TT perhaps, but that's about its only virtue.
I appreciate that you can see larger gains with ES and XL bits. I'm just saying, in universe it would be a lot easier and cheaper to rip off the old armor and strap on some new armor. The only instance, in universe, that I am aware of, though, are the Royal versions of the Marauder (MAD-1R and -2R, the latter also uses DHS and ER PPCs, IIRC).
Edit: I suppose, although FF does need to be manufactured in zero-G conditions, if memory serves, that swapping for FF might be easy enough to do in a standard MechBay, since it is just swapping armor for armor. You'd just have to order it to fit and then wait for it to show up. And therefore, the reason why so many factory variants go for the extensive re-engineering, is simply because of how much more difficult (and much, much more expensive) it would be to do after the 'Mech is built. A bit like buying a 2005 V8 Mustang and trying to make it into a 2013 Shelby Mustang. It would be easier to just buy the new Shelby, but you wouldn't have an especially difficult time putting the bits on to make the old one look more like the new one.
Edited by Haakon Valravn, 13 May 2012 - 08:34 AM.
#17
Posted 14 May 2012 - 08:37 AM
6 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 6 guests, 0 anonymous users