3036 replies to this topic

[Ashnod]

So we have room to make more about the p2w trash obviously.

[Meatoburrito]

[Budor]

Meatoburrito, on 04 March 2013 - 05:37 PM, said:

Summary:

The TWO C-Bill and SINGLE MC purchased coolant flushes with both max out at 35%.

The C-Bill version of coolant HAS TO BE USED TWICE TO EVEN OUT
flushes will allow 2 uses during a match. (One cools 15%, the other cools 20%).

The C-Bill VERSIONS of coolant flushes will require 2 module slots to cool UP TO 35%, whereas the MC version WILL ONLY REQUIRE 1 module slot TO COOL 35%

Both C-Bill and MC versions of coolant flush must be repurchased between rounds if used in a match.

EVEN YOUR BLOODY DIAGRAM SHOWS THAT ITS PAY TO WIN

This one here pretty much sais it all. Oh and dont forget to vote in this thread

Edited by Budor, 04 March 2013 - 05:47 PM.

[Zeus X]

Myself and most of this community demand to know why you guys think this idea is even remotely an intelligent move to make money.

[Helmer]

Hawkwings, on 04 March 2013 - 05:35 PM, said:

My completely innocent thread attempting to gauge the mood of the forums was conglomerated into the hot mess that is the Coolant flush thread! I must protest!

When you merge topics with polls, the polls are lost. I have no confirmation as of yet, however, I think someone who was unaware of this may have merge poll threads in with this one. (Sorry, just got home, so I do not know at this time)

Sorry your poll was merge-deleted.. I was also one of the ones who voted in your poll (No to Coolant modules btw)



Cheers.

[ferranis]

I must say great idea to merge everything in this 117 pages thread of doom, its like a black hole in here. Anybody help?

[Tuku]

My opinion on Collant flush is this..


2 uses per match for Cbills At the cost of a modual slot presumably both flushes at full power.

1 Use per match for MC no way to get a second use

I see myself using Cbills rather than MC even if I had the money just to get the second use

[NeoFighter]

QQ Whine Whine!

[Psikez]

They explained the merge 4 pages back then added another 4 page merge ontop of that threadnaught FOR EASIER REFERENCE

[Hawks]

stjobe, on 04 March 2013 - 05:45 PM, said:

How on earth do you see one 113-page megathread on several disparate subjects being "easier reference"?

You mean you want to learn about something you don't buy every book you can find on the subject, tear all the pages out, shuffle them together randomly and then read it? What are you like?!?

[Allan Frale]

If Coolant Flush gets in, I'm out. Same as 3rd person view.

[Aethon]

DCM Zeus, on 04 March 2013 - 05:46 PM, said:

Myself and most of this community demand to know why you guys think this idea is even remotely an intelligent move to make money.

I am also one of those who want to know.

[FupDup]

0:00 - 0:04

Edited by FupDup, 04 March 2013 - 05:48 PM.

[Noobzorz]

NeoFighter, on 04 March 2013 - 05:46 PM, said:

QQ Whine Whine!

I don't see what's unfair about this. We are all stakeholders in this. Even moreso for people who paid money already.

[Grrzoot]

This isn't to post post about the well know concern out there, please keep that out of this thread.

My concern, and the reason that i was ever against this sort of thing is this:

1.) It helps to destroy role warfare, we see that all-ready with the decreasing amount of medium mechs in 4 and 8 mans.

2.) Instead of building your mech for balance or for a specific role it now allows for build like a 6 ppc stalker or (im looking at you splat-cat) missle boats to be more effective.

3.) it will shorten game length by allowing these boats to continue their constant barrage.

For example, i run a splat-cat sometimes, you see me out there pugging, its fun sometimes. I can manage 3 alphas before shut down, like 1,2,3 otherwise i actually have to watch my heat, maybe not take that shot, maybe just shoot single volleys (which at 75% will still over heat me at 3-4), run away and hide waiting for the next victim etc.

With something like a 2x use coolant flush, now i can double tap, kill, flush, double tap kill, flush double tap in a brawl. Then overheat i mean who cares, i just killed 3 mechs if not more.

There is a downside of course that it promotes bad play, which is good for people who like good play, but that is another thread.

It really is basically a direct % dps increase in power for certain types of mechs.

My issue comes down to this, why didn't you balance heat before adding a heat reduction device?

I'm not going to comment on that other issue, no matter how much i would like to here, and i would request that anyone else that jumps into this thread please do the same.

Thank you

[Zeus X]

NeoFighter, on 04 March 2013 - 05:46 PM, said:

QQ Whine Whine!

Gives you a big hug!

*Pats head, it will be ok I promise*

[Mason Grimm]

[Monky]

I would like to know the reasoning. Are they really that bankrupt?

[Stoicblitzer]

[Skizzak]

Helmer, on 04 March 2013 - 05:44 PM, said:

The Developers do not merge threads, the moderators and customer service do. We have no design decisions. There's little need for 20 threads on the same subject.


For the record, I also do not care for the idea of a Coolant module for various reasons. However, I also think we can intelligently voice our concerns without overly emotional statements.



Cheers.

Ok I agree to some degree however just COMBINING the threads makes this a mess and very hard to decipher wtf is actually going on. It just seems like garbage on top of garbage and the whole meaning of the thread is ******* lost. I'd rather you guys just [REDACTED] delete them rather than combine them into a hot brittany spears mess. OOPS BABY I DID IT............

Edited by Helmer, 04 March 2013 - 05:49 PM.
Language