3036 replies to this topic

[Krazy Kat]

Uh, what?

[Mister Blastman]

Meatoburrito, on 04 March 2013 - 05:41 PM, said:

Summary:


The TWO C-Bill and SINGLE MC purchased coolant flushes with both max out at 35%.

The C-Bill version of coolant HAS TO BE USED TWICE TO EVEN OUT
flushes will allow 2 uses during a match. (One cools 15%, the other cools 20%).

The C-Bill VERSIONS of coolant flushes will require 2 module slots to cool UP TO 35%, whereas the MC version WILL ONLY REQUIRE 1 module slot TO COOL 35%

Both C-Bill and MC versions of coolant flush must be repurchased between rounds if used in a match.

Okay now THAT is a ********. THAT IS PAY TO WIN. Sorry. C-Bill coolant should be 1 slot as well as MC coolant.

******** implementation there.

[Bilbo]

Really, Who is going to buy them. I can't think of a reason to waste a module slot.

[Eisenhorne]

You gonna get banned son.

But I support you! Your right! They should answer to why they have betrayed all of us and made the game a P2W nightmare.

[Tor6]

I want to equip my 'torches and pitchforks' module now. >

[Ashnod]

This thread is stupid... W t f

[anonymous175]

We As A Kunaenunity "demand" An Explanation From The Devs On Why The Jun and Dec Coolant Flush Threads Not Being Merged Is A Good Idea.

[ObsidianSpectre]

I guess we can look at it this way: if the devs see a 500 page thread full of people raging about consumables, maybe they'll reconsider.

500 pages guys. Let's get crackin'.

[BladeSplint]

Lets try to break 3000 responses, quick, everyone start more QQ threads!

[Kousagi]

So, you have to ask... What about the mechs with only 1 mod slot? Yes with mastery they can get 2... but that might be a bit for some people... Now, with CB ones Also taking two slots, that leaves the MC version 1 slot free, which they can use for another consumable type or a real mod, which the CB version can't do. While Not game breaking, this does open the doors for P2W to be let in. Its the start of a very bad path.

Edited by Kousagi, 04 March 2013 - 05:49 PM.

[Psikez]

Seems like It'd have been easier to make a coolant-gate official thread and pinned it and said post here now, everything else will be locked instead of necroing a threadnaught from december and making it so much more confusing for EASIER REFERENCE

[Volume]

Aidan Malchor, on 05 December 2012 - 05:37 PM, said:

So as the title says we should get a coolant flush module. It would be so awesome!

Discuss.

In case this wasn't clear I was kidding.

Oh the irony.

[Meatoburrito]

hey man! no ranting here, this needs to stay up

[Zeus X]

Myself and most of this community demand to know why you guys think this idea is even remotely an intelligent move to make money.

[FupDup]

0:00 - 0:04

[BladeSplint]

by the way if you've made it back here, don't bother responding, no one cares by this point. Seriously you're on page 118

[jakucha]

Mister Blastman, on 04 March 2013 - 05:48 PM, said:

Okay now THAT is a ********. THAT IS PAY TO WIN.

Not really. C-bill variant gives you two separate opportunities to flush coolant whereas MC only gives 1 chance. That means later on in the match when you need it again, too bad, it's gone.

[MischiefSC]

I'm not sure there's opinions to be discussed or heard. A business decision seems to have been made to go pay to win on MWO, starting with some consumables. Or is there a developer who's going to come here and offer up a valid, legitimate assurance that somehow selling superior items for cash than what can be bought with cbills isn't pay to win and isn't going continue anywhere at all except coolant flush?

I just wish it'd been a little more honest I guess. Just say you're going pay2win in the WoT model and everyone else can ****. Dancing around it just damages an already bloody credibility. All other MW properties available were removed (MekTek, MWLL) and now MWO has gone P2W. I get how business works just please, don't add insult to injury and pretend it's otherwise.

[NeoFighter]

QQ Whine Whine!

[HRR Insanity]

Agree. +1. Supported.